(inline)
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:45:07AM -0800, Rajiv Kurian wrote:
> I currently have a topic with 1024 partitions. I know it's kind of going
> past the recommended limits, but I kept it like that because I am moving a
> legacy system to kafka and it has a 1024 parallel partitions. I wanted to
I currently have a topic with 1024 partitions. I know it's kind of going
past the recommended limits, but I kept it like that because I am moving a
legacy system to kafka and it has a 1024 parallel partitions. I wanted to
understand the costs of having so many partitions a little bit more though.
I