So far no. It happens periodically and seems to resolve when we restart the
broker (only to eventually reappear). There are a couple of things I need
to get out of the way in our setup first but I'll see what I can do to
reproduce it.
We had a couple of bad shutdowns performed and brokers restarte
+1 - if you have a way to reproduce that would be ideal. We don't know
the root cause of this yet. Our guess is a corner case around
shutdowns, but not sure.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 03:13:45PM -0700, Jun Rao wrote:
> Is there a way that you can reproduce this easily?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jun
>
> On
Is there a way that you can reproduce this easily?
Thanks,
Jun
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Marc Labbe wrote:
> No exactly, the topics are compacted but messages are not compressed.
>
> I get the exact same error though. Any other options I should consider?
> We're on 0.8.2.0 and we also h
I suppose that the patch for KAFKA-1641 had a fix for this issue.
Also it might be worth looking at Kafka-1755.
Thanks,
Mayuresh
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Marc Labbe wrote:
> No exactly, the topics are compacted but messages are not compressed.
>
> I get the exact same error though. Any
No exactly, the topics are compacted but messages are not compressed.
I get the exact same error though. Any other options I should consider?
We're on 0.8.2.0 and we also had this on 0.8.1.1 before.
marc
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Jun Rao wrote:
> Did you get into that issue for the sam
Did you get into that issue for the same reason as in the jira, i.e.,
somehow compressed messages were sent to the compact topics?
Thanks,
Jun
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 6:45 AM, Marc Labbe wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we're often seeing log cleaner exceptions reported in KAFKA-1641 and I'd
> like to know
Hello,
we're often seeing log cleaner exceptions reported in KAFKA-1641 and I'd
like to know if it's safe to apply the patch from that issue resolution to
0.8.2.1?
Reference: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1641
Also there are 2 patches in there, I suppose I should be using only the