Re: [VOTE] 1.0.0 RC1

2017-10-17 Thread Vahid S Hashemian
: [VOTE] 1.0.0 RC1 If you don't use the default Scala version, you have to set the SCALA_VERSION environment variable for the bin scripts to work. Ismael On 17 Oct 2017 1:30 am, "Vahid S Hashemian" wrote: Hi Guozhang, I'm not sure if this should be covered by "Java 9 sup

Re: [VOTE] 1.0.0 RC1

2017-10-17 Thread Thomas Crayford
hid > > > > > From: Guozhang Wang > To: "d...@kafka.apache.org" , > "users@kafka.apache.org" , kafka-clients > > Date: 10/13/2017 01:12 PM > Subject:[VOTE] 1.0.0 RC1 > > > > Hello Kafka users, developers and client-dev

Re: [VOTE] 1.0.0 RC1

2017-10-16 Thread Ismael Juma
g" , kafka-clients Date: 10/13/2017 01:12 PM Subject:[VOTE] 1.0.0 RC1 Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers, This is the second candidate for release of Apache Kafka 1.0.0. It's worth noting that starting in this version we are using a different version proto

Re: [VOTE] 1.0.0 RC1

2017-10-16 Thread Vahid S Hashemian
ahid From: Guozhang Wang To: "d...@kafka.apache.org" , "users@kafka.apache.org" , kafka-clients Date: 10/13/2017 01:12 PM Subject:[VOTE] 1.0.0 RC1 Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers, This is the second candidate for release of Apache Kaf

Re: [kafka-clients] Re: [VOTE] 1.0.0 RC1

2017-10-16 Thread Guozhang Wang
Thanks Jun, I will roll out a new RC for this PR then. Guozhang On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Jun Rao wrote: > Hi, Guozhang, > > Onur found an existing performance bug in the controller when there are > lots of partitions. The fix is simple (https://github.com/apache/ > kafka/pull/4075) an

Re: [kafka-clients] Re: [VOTE] 1.0.0 RC1

2017-10-16 Thread Jun Rao
Hi, Guozhang, Onur found an existing performance bug in the controller when there are lots of partitions. The fix is simple ( https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/4075) and reduces the controlled shutdown time from 6.5 mins to 30 secs, with 25K partitions, RF=2 and 5 brokers. It would be useful t

Re: [VOTE] 1.0.0 RC1

2017-10-16 Thread Guozhang Wang
Hi Tom, Thanks for pointing it out. I meant to say Oct. 17th, Tuesday, for a 72 hours period. That being said, we need to have a lazy majority to accept a release RC according to our bylaws ( https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Bylaws). And if we cannot achieve that via thorough tes

Re: [VOTE] 1.0.0 RC1

2017-10-16 Thread Thomas Crayford
Hi Guozhang, This says the due date on the testing is October 13th, which was the day this email was sent. Is that accurate, or is it meant to read October 17th, which is next Tuesday? I feel like this short a testing window for a 1.0 RC is a little low, as 1.0 is clearly a big announcement of st

[VOTE] 1.0.0 RC1

2017-10-13 Thread Guozhang Wang
Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers, This is the second candidate for release of Apache Kafka 1.0.0. It's worth noting that starting in this version we are using a different version protocol with three digits: *major.minor.bug-fix* Any and all testing is welcome, but the followin