Kafka documentation. It
is mentioned only on one place.
Regards,
Petr
From: Petr Novak [mailto:oss.mli...@gmail.com]
Sent: 2. května 2017 15:39
To: users@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Does queue.time still apply for the new Producer?
The documentation reads as:
"As events enter a queue, they are buf
The documentation reads as:
"As events enter a queue, they are buffered in a queue, until either
queue.time or batch.size is reached. A background thread
(kafka.producer.async.ProducerSendThread) dequeues the batch of data and
lets the kafka.producer.EventHandler serialize and send the data to the
> 1 (I think the default is 5) then
you can get a commit log with messages out of order wrt the original published
order (because retries are done in parallel rather then in series)
-hans
On Apr 30, 2017, at 3:13 AM, Petr Novak <mailto:oss.mli...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hello,
Hello,
Does Kafka producer waits till previous batch returns response before
sending next one? Do I assume correctly that it does not when retries can
change ordering?
Hence batches delay is introduced only by producer internal send loop time
and linger?
If a timeout would be localized onl
Hello,
Nobody has experience with Kafka Connect tasks with external dependencies?
Thanks,
Petr
From: Petr Novak [mailto:oss.mli...@gmail.com]
Sent: 23. února 2017 14:48
To: users@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Pattern to create Task with dependencies (DI)
Hello,
it seems that KConnect
Hello,
it seems that KConnect take control over creating task instance and requires
no-arg constructor. What is the recommended pattern when I need to create a
task which has dependency e.g. on some db client and I want to be able to
pass in mock in tests, preferable through constructor?
In Java
nsumer group using the PartitionData constructor
> (
> http://apache.osuosl.org/kafka/0.8.2-beta/java-doc/org/apache/kafka/common
> /requests/OffsetCommitRequest.PartitionData.html)
> -Erik
>
> On 9/17/15, 1:09 PM, "Petr Novak" wrote:
>
> >Hi all,
> >ca
Hi all,
can I add custom metadata to the new commit topic which I could use to
recover my app? This would give me some level of consistency if I could
commit my additional data at once instead of writing them to another topic.
Many thanks,
Petr
> with them is the application's logic. Consume them, if they're not relevant
> pick up the next message.
>
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Petr Novak wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > ... by returning null?
> >
> > Many thanks,
> > Petr
> >
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Sharninder
>
Hi,
to my knowledge this is generally solved by partitioner which logs messages
with the same key to the same topic. It is not clear why you can't use this
approach.
With Regards,
Petr
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 12:35 PM, David KOCH wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to consume messages from multi
Hi all,
... by returning null?
Many thanks,
Petr
11 matches
Mail list logo