Hi Guruprasad,
What Matthias was asking, is what your JIRA account username is?
So that he or other committer can help you grant you the permission to
assign JIRA tickets.
If you haven't got the JIRA account yet, you can sign up here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Signup!default.jspa
Thank
Link to Jira I would like to address:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10047
Thanks,
On 2020/05/26 17:26:06, "Matthias J. Sax" wrote:
> What is your Jira ID?
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 5/24/20 8:31 PM, Guruprasad Tahasildar wrote:
> > Request for adding to contributors list.
> >
> > Tha
I know that there is a documentation for humans. But I needed a
machine readable spec so that I could send requests from somewhere
without a specific client library. So, I created a spec document from
the jaxrs resources used by Kafka Connector. If there are interests in
the community, I can attac
For example it could be some "static" information, like a mapping from
zip code to city name.
Something that does usually not change over time.
-Matthias
On 5/25/20 9:55 PM, Pushkar Deole wrote:
> Matthias,
>
> I am wondering what you mean by "Global store hold "axially" data that is
> provide
Team,
Could you please help on my below query?
-Original Message-
From: JOHN, BIBIN
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2020 11:48 PM
To: users@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Kafka Timeout Exception
*** Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T ***.
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSec
What is your Jira ID?
-Matthias
On 5/24/20 8:31 PM, Guruprasad Tahasildar wrote:
> Request for adding to contributors list.
>
> Thanks,
> Guru T
>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
The KIP for the current rebalancing protocol is probably a good reference:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-415:+Incremental+Cooperative+Rebalancing+in+Kafka+Connect
--
Robin Moffatt | Senior Developer Advocate | ro...@confluent.io | @rmoff
On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 14:25, D
Hi Robin
Thanks for the clarification.
As you suggested, that task allocation between the workers is
nondeterministic. I have shared the same information within in my team but
there are some other parties, with whom I need to share this information as
explanation for the issue raised by them and
Yes, I checked it. The issue is that RoundRobbinPartitioner is bound to the
producer. In a scenario with multiple producers it doesn't guarantee equal
distribution - from what I understood and from my tests, the following
situation happens with it:
[image: image.png]
Of course, the first partitio
Hey Vinicius,
On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 10:27, Vinicius Scheidegger <
vinicius.scheideg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In a scenario with multiple independent producers (imagine ephemeral
> dockers, that do not know the state of each other), what should be the
> approach for the messages being sent to be e
In a scenario with multiple independent producers (imagine ephemeral
dockers, that do not know the state of each other), what should be the
approach for the messages being sent to be equally distributed over a topic
partition?
>From what I understood the partition election is always on the Produce
11 matches
Mail list logo
