+1 (binding).
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 6:09 PM, Matthias J. Sax
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to start the vote for KIP-247:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> 247%3A+Add+public+test+utils+for+Kafka+Streams
>
>
> -Matthias
>
>
--
-- Guozhang
Hi:
I use kafka for days. and it's normal at beginning .
yesterday. I found kafka topic leader often switch to one to another.
and in kafka server.log throw the error:
This server is not the leader for that topic-partition.
kafka-version:
kafka_2.11-1.0.0
funk...@l
Hi everyone,
Fortunately this didn't happen with a production cluster, but here is
the sequence of events with this 10 broker cluster:
1) Stop all kafka brokers servers (this was a mistake on my part; I
intended to do a rolling restart)
2) Start 5 brokers a few minutes apart each
3) Start the rest
Hi,
I would like to start the vote for KIP-247:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-247%3A+Add+public+test+utils+for+Kafka+Streams
-Matthias
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
I updated the KIP and added an `OutputVerifier` class. Looking forward
to your feedback.
I will start the Vote thread in parallel.
-Matthias
On 1/17/18 11:40 AM, Matthias J. Sax wrote:
> Saïd,
>
> sorry for late reply. Avro records are basically supported. However,
> there are no plans
Congratulations, Rajini Sivaram. Very well deserved!
发件人: Konstantine Karantasis
发送时间: 2018年1月18日 6:23
收件人: d...@kafka.apache.org
抄送: users@kafka.apache.org
主题: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Kafka PMC Member: Rajini Sivaram
Congrats Rajini!
-Konstantine
On Wed, Jan 17,
Congratulations Rajini!
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:23 AM, Konstantine Karantasis <
konstant...@confluent.io> wrote:
> Congrats Rajini!
>
> -Konstantine
>
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 2:18 PM, Becket Qin wrote:
>
> > Congratulations, Rajini!
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Ismael Juma wrote
if RF=2 and min.insync.replicas=1 (the default) then you shouldn't have
offline partitions if 1 of 3 brokers is down.
I'd first double check your topic config (and broker defaults) for the one
that went offline to verify RF/Min. Be sure to check each partition they
can be different! ( kafka-topics
There are several bugs in 0.9 around consumer offsets and compaction and
log cleaning.
The easiest path forward is to upgrade to the latest 0.11.x. We ended up
going to somewhat extreme lengths to deal with 100GB+ consumer offsets.
When we tested an upgrade we noticed that when it started compac
Congrats Rajini!
-Konstantine
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 2:18 PM, Becket Qin wrote:
> Congratulations, Rajini!
>
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
>
> > Congratulations Rajini!
> >
> > On 17 Jan 2018 10:49 am, "Gwen Shapira" wrote:
> >
> > Dear Kafka Developers, Users and Fan
Congratulations, Rajini!
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Congratulations Rajini!
>
> On 17 Jan 2018 10:49 am, "Gwen Shapira" wrote:
>
> Dear Kafka Developers, Users and Fans,
>
> Rajini Sivaram became a committer in April 2017. Since then, she remained
> active in the com
Congratulations Rajini!
On 17 Jan 2018 10:49 am, "Gwen Shapira" wrote:
Dear Kafka Developers, Users and Fans,
Rajini Sivaram became a committer in April 2017. Since then, she remained
active in the community and contributed major patches, reviews and KIP
discussions. I am glad to announce that
Saïd,
sorry for late reply. Avro records are basically supported. However,
there are no plans atm to integrate the test driver with a schema
registry. Note, that Apache Kafka does not provide a schema registry by
itself. If we integrate one RS, we need to integrate all of them -- that
is something
Congrats Rajini!!
-Matthias
On 1/17/18 10:54 AM, Vahid S Hashemian wrote:
> Great news! Congratulations Rajini!
>
> --Vahid
>
>
>
> From: Gwen Shapira
> To: "d...@kafka.apache.org" , Users
>
> Date: 01/17/2018 10:49 AM
> Subject:[ANNOUNCE] New Kafka PMC Member: Rajini Sivar
Great news! Congratulations Rajini!
--Vahid
From: Gwen Shapira
To: "d...@kafka.apache.org" , Users
Date: 01/17/2018 10:49 AM
Subject:[ANNOUNCE] New Kafka PMC Member: Rajini Sivaram
Dear Kafka Developers, Users and Fans,
Rajini Sivaram became a committer in April 2017. Si
We will fix this. No worries. And it is basically only a problem for
Stream-Table join...
All other operators don't "suffer" from the current behavior.
I think in the end, we need to do multiple poll() calls and pause
partitions to make sure the internal RecordQueue has data for all input
partiti
Dear Kafka Developers, Users and Fans,
Rajini Sivaram became a committer in April 2017. Since then, she remained
active in the community and contributed major patches, reviews and KIP
discussions. I am glad to announce that Rajini is now a member of the
Apache Kafka PMC.
Congratulations, Rajini
Hi.
I read (mostly) all documentation top to bottom and happened to stumble
upon passage I cannot understand. It states:
https://kafka.apache.org/documentation/#impl_consumerregistration
"If the consumer creates a message stream using a topic filter, it also
registers a watch on changes (new top
I have read through the source, following StreamThread ->
AssignedStreamTasks -> StreamTask -> PartitionGroup -> RecordQueue. I see,
as you said, that everything depends on what records the consumer initially
returns from poll.
I wonder how this problem might be solved in the bigger picture. Certa
whats your config for min.insync.replicas?
2018-01-17 13:37 GMT+01:00 Sameer Kumar :
> Hi,
>
> I have a cluster of 3 Kafka brokers, and replication factor is 2. This
> means I can tolerate failure of 1 node without data loss.
>
> Recently, one of my node crashed and some of my partitions went off
From: 猪少爷
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 8:21 PM
To: users
Subject: I would like to increase the bandwidth by binding each broker to each
network card in one machine. Is this feasible?
I would like to increase the bandwidth by binding each broker to each netw
> That depends what data the consumer fetches and this part is hard to
predict. For this reason, you need to buffer multiple records in a
store, in case data does not arrive in the order and you need it
(between different topics) and later do the processing in the correct
order when you got all dat
Hi,
I have a cluster of 3 Kafka brokers, and replication factor is 2. This
means I can tolerate failure of 1 node without data loss.
Recently, one of my node crashed and some of my partitions went offline.
I am not sure if this should be the case. Am I missing something.
-Sameer.
Hi Pritam,
It is basically about the probabilities, right? If you use 3 brokers as
bootstrap servers, what is the probability that all three will be
unavailable at the same time? To make it more reliable:
- the more brokers in the bootstrap list the lower the probability that all
of them will be d
Matthias,
What about testing topology that use avro schema ? Have you read my
previous response ?
Thanks.
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 3:34 AM Matthias J. Sax
wrote:
> Colin,
>
> the TopologyTestDriver does not connect to any broker and simulates
> processing of single-partitioned input topics pure
Hi,
I have a use case where my kafka cluster will have 1000 brokers and I am
writing kafka client.
In order to write client, i need to provide brokers list.
Question is, what are the recommended guidelines to provide brokers list in
client?
*Is there any proxy like service available in kafka whi
26 matches
Mail list logo