This is changed in 0.8. The # of partitions is defined at topic creation
time and it doesn't change with more brokers.
Thanks,
Jun
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Xiaoyu Wang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As I remembered 0.7.0 requires manually create partitions for existing
> topics when we add new br
Currently, this is not possible. The only way to stop mirror making is to
kill -15.
Thanks
Jun
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:01 AM, 王国栋 wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> When the producer in the MirrorMaker tool throws exceptions, I can find one
> of the streaming threads stops, but the mirror make process hangs
We have fixed this issue in 0.8. Withreplication factor 1, if the producer
doesn't care about partitioning by key, messages will be sent to partitions
that are currently available.
Thanks,
Jun
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Michal Haris wrote:
> Same here, summary was need as we have a fairly
Hi all,
As I remembered 0.7.0 requires manually create partitions for existing
topics when we add new brokers. Does 0.7.1 automatically create partitions
on newly added brokers? It seems to be doing that, just want to confirm.
Also, if that true, is there a way to prevent existing topic being add
Same here, summary was need as we have a fairly large ecosystem of multiple
0.7.2 clusters and I am planning to test upgrade to 0.8.
However, one thing creeping at the back of my mind regarding 0.8 is
something i have spotted in one thread few weeks ago namely that the
rebalance behaviour of produ
Same here. Thanks a lot Jun.
Regards,
Vaibhav
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Felix GV wrote:
> Thanks Jun!
>
> I hadn't been following the discussions regarding 0.8 and replication for a
> little while and this was a great post to refresh my memory and get up to
> speed on the current replica
Thanks Jun!
I hadn't been following the discussions regarding 0.8 and replication for a
little while and this was a great post to refresh my memory and get up to
speed on the current replication architecture's design.
--
Felix
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Jun Rao wrote:
> I just posted the