Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] shebang line in windows

Alex Jackson wrote: Is there a way to associate a file or a file type with a certain interpreter through the apache config? See http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/core.html#scriptinterpretersource although I know I was contemplating how to trick out wsh scripts to use a shebang at one poin

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] error when running binbuild.sh

Tan, Liao wrote: Environment: apache 2.0.46 hp-ux 11 Where can we start to solve the error? a modern version of httpd version 2.0? That would bring you a long ways. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apach

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Packaging Apache httpd 2.2.x

fredk2 wrote: Hi, I am looking to compile httpd for a specific target directory structure that I do not have acccess to. So I cannot use --prefix=/target/dir If I set --prefix=/build/dir then all the configuration files in conf have the wrong directory instead of the proper /target/dir. Are the

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Packaging Apache httpd 2.2.x

fredk2 wrote: Thanks Bill, I looked again at configure (autoconf script?) and I saw additional make install options so i did: configure --prefix=/target/dir . make make install exec_prefix=/build/dir prefix=/build/dir It almost worked except for two subdirectories: /target/dir include

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ab, keep-alive and chunked response

Andrew Gaydenko wrote: OK. Let's try another way. Is there a possibility to force Apache server to use chunked response? Probably I have missed something in doc... Not from the client, per say. When the client advertises HTTP/1.1 support, it is required to accept Transfer-Encoding: chunked as

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ab, keep-alive and chunked response

Andrew Gaydenko wrote: Is ApacheBench intended to work with (simultaneous) persistent connection and chunked response? Yes, and no. the ab -k flag toggles keepalive behavior for keepalibes, -c sets the number of parallel connections. ab advertises HTTP/1.0 so it's not chunked-ready. Good arg

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Incorporating apr-1.3.2 into httpd-2.2.9 build

John A Parker wrote: I can see where this is an acknowledged issue fixed in apr-1.3.2. What I can't find anywhere is how to incorporate this updated apr into my apache build. Can anyone provide "detailed" directions for me on how to accomplish this? two choices; 1) build and install 1.3.2

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: httpd php dump

kalin m wrote: what would this mean: # ./configure --prefix=/etc/httpd --enable-ssl --with-ssl=/usr/local/ssl --enable-rewrite --enable-so --enable-headers --enable-unique-id checking for chosen layout... Apache checking for working mkdir -p... yes checking build system type... x86_64-unknown

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache Monitor not Showing All Instances of Apache

Nick Cooper wrote: Hello, I have four instances of Apache installed on a Windows XP SP2 machine, all four instances are working correctly. The problem is Apache Monitor is only showing two instances. Versions in use: 2.0.61 - shown 2.2.4 - shown 2.2.8 - not shown 2.2.9 - not shown 2.2.8 was

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache hang and kernel entropy

Arnab Ganguly wrote: Hi All, Anybody faced Apache hang due to the kernel entropy issue? What was the workaround adopted for that? 2.2.9 recently switched several cases of consuming real entropy with the psuedorandom equivilant, and it defaults to /dev/urandom if available in lieu of /dev/rando

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd folder is owned by root

VPN Cluster wrote: After successful compilation of Apache 2.2.9 , Apache folder on /usr/lcoal/httpd is owned by root:root. It should be owned by apache:apache. Never. Absolutely not. Anyone who compromises apache with an arbitrary code execution exploit or uses any number of vulnerable scr

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to configure Apache 2.x for HTTP 1.0 version?

Sander Temme wrote: On Jul 14, 2008, at 10:52 PM, Anand Kulkarni wrote: I want HTTP 1.0 protocol because I heard that passing content length in HTTP 1.0 request is not mandatory. It's not mandatory in 1.1 either. See http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2616.html and scroll down to section 14.13.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] virtual instances

Melanie Pfefer wrote: Hi, Actually I want to have different customers that use different apache servers without the need to install many apache servers. I thought of reusing the http binary. Could you please help in this regard? Should I simply copy the httpd.conf and change the logs location

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 1.3.41 download website

Sutida Yenjaichon wrote: Could you advise the website I can download Apache version 1.3.41 for Win32. I don't see any .msi file download paackage (like apache_1.3.41-win32-x86-no_ssl.msi) on the main Apache website? You are so strongly discouraged from using it, that it's not there. This code

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] V 2.2.9: configure: WARNING: Unrecognized options: --enable-mod etc

Ron Savage wrote: Hi Ron I notice configure for 2.2.8 was generated by GNU Autoconf 2.60 and for 2.2.9 it was 2.62. I just upgraded to 2.61 (don't know what from). I wonder if that's relevant? More info. I just re-ran the command in the 2.2.8 directory, and it works without error. So it's no

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Here's a new one (to me).

Grant Peel wrote: On this past Saturday, my server started seeing sporadic spikes in CPU usage. As it turns out, somehow, some bot or something somewhere is connecting to me server and relaying messages to another server. Don't freak out... Log lines: 66.139.69.201 - - [29/Jul/2008:04:01:

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_authn_dbd encrypted password?!

Crypt::MD5 supports Apache md5. Bill Joshua Slive wrote: On 6/27/06, Chris Liles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: After looking at the perl script suggested by Joshua, I see that I can use crypt(), so I tested and it works. Of course postgres doesn't have a crypt() function :( I really want to be a

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] a procedural question

Paul Adamczyk wrote: I am analyzing the compliance of Web servers with the HTTP standard. I would like to request some feedback on my results. Which of the many Apache mailing lists would be most appropriate to submit that request? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with observations of compliance or lac

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Apache v2.0.58 binaries for Windows w/SSL

Doc, It was my understanding that we have completed the SSL notification process (and we had) - but shortly after shipping 2.0.58 and preparing for 2.2.2 (which needed a revised notification for the 'richer' ECC cryptography in OpenSSL 0.9.8) some potential gaps in the process were discovered. T

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Testing mod_isapi r416293 on Apache 2.0/2.2

If anyone would like to help Matt and I determine that our recent patches address all known issues, the file http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/mod_isapi-416293.zip includes the binary mod_isapi.so (and debugging .pdb) to be copied into the installed apache2.0 or the apache2.2 directory. It also

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CGI help on apache needed

Joshua Slive wrote: On 7/5/06, Rajat Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My cgi script needs to do some dirty work. User is supposed to be notified via email when the job is done. Issue is that the after submit of the page, the IE still keeps loading the page until the long\dirty job is over

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CGI help on apache needed

It sounds like a bug, but for good measure, try closing both STDOUT and the STDERR handle. Rajat Sharma wrote: Intrestingly, Even if CGI is told to print instantly, the apache knows that the "long job" is doing something and might need to print out. This is why it waits for the "long job" to be

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Conversion of SSL request URL to non-SSL request

Joshua Slive wrote: On 7/5/06, Qingshan Xie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Boyle, I have a related question. We'd like to implement a SSL-Login on a HTTP(port 80) webServer to secure the userId/password. This means, whenever a site needs the authentication, the webServer redirects it to HT

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2 mod_authnz_ldap binding

I suggest a 600 perms sub-conf file you 'Include' in the main httpd.conf, illegible to the non-root user. Or use starttls/ssl and add this client's ldap cert to your servers ldap CA chain, protecting the key 600 as you would always do. Same difference. Erik Froese wrote: I'm trying to move fr

[EMAIL PROTECTED] [FEEDBACK] Win32 users, mod_aspdotnet build 2004 VOTE underway

mod_aspdotnet build 2004 is prepared for httpd-2.0.x and 2.2.x and the dev@ list is considering the candidate for release. Please help review and test, please see the dev list post http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-httpd-dev&m=115230543209164&w=2 Your feedback of the results of your testin

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2 chaos

Ok, if Apache is truly hanging, there is a clever trick (that works on all versions of Apache). 1) Unzip the -symbols.zip files in the root Apache2 directory tree (where bin\, htdocs\, modules\ etc. are usually found.) These .pdb files should unpack alongside the .exe, .dll, .so binary fil

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing FastCGI on Windows

Jose Adriano Baltieri wrote: Hello ! I've installed 2.2.2 on Windows XP and then, I'm trying to put it to work with FastCGI. Http server is OK but all I need is FastCGI. Then, I've downloaded http://www.fastcgi.com/dist/mod_fastcgi-2.4.2-AP20.dll as Oh my. It seems no matter how many tim

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 1.3, 4GB file limit

Bryan Hansen wrote: I am trying to find a solution to the 4GB file limit that exists in Apache 1.3. Most resources that discuss this issue offer solutions to patch apache which only seem to work with apache 2.0+. (ie http://people.apache.org/~jorton/ap_splitlfs.diff) Perhaps that's because fo

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.2 and WebSphere PlugIn

Qingshan Xie wrote: If the Apache-2.2.2 compiled with mod_so, Apache should be able to load mod_was_ap20_http.so without any issue. Not likely. First, there is a module signature of "AP20" in any module which was compiled under apache 2.0, which absolutely will not load under apache 2.2 (the

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Windows XP Apache 2.0 msi file buggy?

Morgan Gangwere wrote: sometimes... I have apache running on linux, and the filename "newsletter april 06.pdf" gets mangled as "newsletter%20april%3006%3pdf" - apache dosent do the hex conversion logically sometimes when it serves the file. thats an old issue that I think has snuck around the sha

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_*_cache on 2.0 vs. 2.2

Forrest Aldrich wrote: The servers have an absurd amount of RAM (8gb or more) that we could utilize for mod_mem_cache. If that's the case, if your content is non-trivial (different reactions to client characteristics, such as language, charset, or browser content that varies) - I strongly rec

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_*_cache on 2.0 vs. 2.2

Forrest Aldrich wrote: The only thing that would vary, in this case, is if the image had been updated/changed, in which case it would need to be pulled in from the backend DB. The images are 768k jpg (or less), and because it's a cache, it's disposable... That is not a vary ;-) And it's

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Retirement of mod_aspdotnet

Graeme Walker wrote: Hi, I noticed that the mod_aspdotnet has been retired, does anyone have any info as to why, or if the module is going to be developed as a core Apache module. The last thing I want to do is return to IIS for ASP.NET development :) Simply stay tuned for

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.55 bringing Win2k3 to a halt

Jim Keller wrote: Hi Nick, Thanks for the reply. The configs are identical on all three machines; these servers just serve up a few custom ASP scripts to relay information from the field to the backoffice (via a custom software package that uses HTTP requests to send & retrieve the data). I

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] New Windows build - Apache 2.2.3

Saw this on dev@ - just hadn't had an opportunity to reply, sorry Chris... hunter wrote: > The error(s) that I am getting are not caused by the defines. > > I still get the error I indicated in my first email. > > Creating library .\Release\mod_unique_id.lib and object > .\Release\mod_unique_id.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache amout to 100% cpu

HAMMER_SHI wrote: > The enviroment as follow: > OS: Windows2003 > Apache 2.0 > > Today , I logon in the windows remotely, I found CPU amount to 100%. > > Anyone could tell me how to slove? No. But we can tell you how to get enough information to have a clue about what happened (fyi you better

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Retirement of mod_aspdotnet

wrote: > Hi Bill, > > Any news on the 2004 release of the mod_aspdotnet? Do you have an msi > build of it you could send me. I only have VS 2005 so I can't build it > from source myself. > > Cheers > Graeme > > On 7/26/06, *William A. Rowe, Jr.* <[EMAIL PRO

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Getting in Contact with Mailling Admin?

Joshua Slive wrote: > > You can contact users-owner at httpd.apache.org, but that will go to > me, so you can contact me off-list if you'd like. Raises a good question; what about a new footer to keep down the noise? The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 for Windows compile - DLL search order - help needed

Nick Kew wrote: > On Sunday 13 August 2006 17:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Can sombody help me to set up Apache to load dlls of Oracle? > > Apache will need ORACLE_BASE in its environment. On *X we just set that in > apachectl. I don't know what a windoze equivalent looks like. Similar; you

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How Apache manages all its children - Add More Info

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I wonder if anybody has tried Windows prefork for Apache 2.2.2. The issue is the lack-of-fork in the Win32 API. It's supported at the ntdll layer, meaning that all the win32-ism's such as their thread-local storage model don't survive the fork() at all. For pure N

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] installing Apache 2.23 under Windows

Octavian Rasnita wrote: > > Then I have tried a few times more, and on one try I specified again d:\ but > the server was installed on d:\ directly, without creating an apache2.2 or > another apacheXX dir. > > I have uninstalled again, and I specified d:\apache, but this time it was > installed s

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How can I get asp-pages work with Apache 2

pasi julkunen wrote: > This intructions came along: > > LoadModule aspdotnet_module "../modules/mod_aspdotnet.so" Those lines were fine (I suppose it tells you in your error.log file that mod_aspdotnet is loaded)... > #AspNetMount /app-uri "C:/path/to/app" Did you really leave the '#' signs in?

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to enable Crypt in .htpasswd on Windows (Apache 2.0.54)?

Joshua Slive wrote: > On 8/22/06, Bo Berglund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I have a published website with several protected directories using >> various .htaccess/.htpasswd files. It has been working fine for about >> 10 years. The server is on a commercial webhost using Apache on Unix. >> >> I k

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache ./configure problems

Richard de Vries wrote: > Have a look at http://www.sunfreeware.com And if you want to build... read the big red notes about gcc and syncing system headers ;-) - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server P

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_security general question...

Jignesh Badani wrote: > Thanks Nick, it makes sense. So can I assume that the Apache group is fine > with its user base using 3rd party mod_security Why not? http://modules.apache.org/ - lots of modules - we have no problem with users deploying any module which solves their requirements. > and

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] add start parameter to apache as windows service

Two schools of thought. One, if you are only testing, bring up the services property page of the apache service and put -D SSL in the options box next to the start button and click start. Good for one startup only. Two, in the apache root directory, bin\apache -k config -D SSL changes (configure

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.59 with SSL installation issue.

One Guess ... did you actually blast config.cache and rerun your ./config.nice or did you simply try installing over 0.9.8b ... one trouble is that httpd's configure will remember the original openssl and it's discovered options. Richard de Vries wrote: > I remember seeing a similiar thread somew

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How do I determine my server's name?

What a silly app... the right test is to see if the request came in through 127.0.0.1 (al la localhost loopback) and distrust the rest :) ipconfig should tell you your IP, maybe your name on win32. Try ifconfig on Mac. Then nslookup {your ip} to see if it is known, otherwise your server's 'name'

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache - TRACE vulnerability solution

Swapan Gupta wrote: > > I am using Apache 2.0.54 and trying out the suggested solution for the > Http TRACE vulnerability as mentioned at > using the mod_rewrite module and specifying the following lines in > .htaccess file. Whoops. NO. You can't play this game at the directory level, modify yo

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0 starts but won't serve documents

Al McNicoll wrote: > -- I've used Win32DisableAcceptEx (the server was crashing and logging > several AcceptEx errors per second otherwise) That's a good start, and tells us that you have a non-standard windows sockets stack. If it has buggy drivers, assume that EnableSendfile and EnableMMap shou

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] link to ab with ssl support

It's all spelled out - but the 'magic' you are specifically interested in is the abs.dsp project, which enables SSL and sets the path to the srclib/openssl/ tree (you can create a junction to your SSL tree, or you can add that to INCLUDE and LIB paths.) Building the abs target compiles in openssl

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod ssl with Apache 2.2.2 SOLVED

Roger Harrell wrote: >>> I'm in the process of migrating servers. New server running Apache 2.2.2. >>> It didn't come with mod_ssl.so. What's the current config for getting >>> mod_ssl up and running with Apache 2.2.2. >> >> Otherwise, check your supplier's documentation. > > Uh, ok yeah. It didn

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows max threads

There's a quirk, when event #64 is triggered, it actually maps to the same result code as 'timeout'. Would call this a bug in the winnt mpm. Alex Turner wrote: > Joshua, > > Thanks for you thoughts - I would have said the same thing. I forgot to > mention that the max threads per child is se

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debugging virtual hosts?

bwobbones wrote: > Hi, > > Does anyone know how I can see the process by which apache is working out > which vhost to go to? I've got a problem where it's always going to the > default (http://www.nabble.com/More-Virtual-Host-problems-tf2265477.html) Unless you run perchild or memutex (sp?) MP

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache for Windows: restarting gracefully

Júlio Maranhão wrote: > Can Apache 2.0.X for Windows be gracefully restarted? Yes... > Using "Apache Service Monitor" what does the "Restart" button exactly > do? net stop/start Apache2 sequence, a graceful restart or neither? ...a graceful restart. If you use Win32's service manager, of course

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache for Windows: restarting gracefully

Aaron Wagner wrote: > I've always used the command prompt. > > apache -k restart This also happens to cause a graceful by sending user-defined service control word 128. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTT

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Running Apache with DocumentRoot on a Mapped Drive

Williams, Dewey wrote: > I have tried to do this for years and it always fails. I keep hoping a > version of Apache httpd for Win32 will finally recognize mapped drives > but so far, no matter how I setup permissions and accounts, it doesn't > work. > > If anyone has this working and can walk "us

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_aspdotnet

It is in-transistion, not retired. You can find some transitional, unreleased binaries at http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/aspdotnet_moving/ which (once rebranded) will land at http://sourceforge.net/projects/mod-aspdotnet. Yours, Bill Derek Cordon wrote: > Hello, > > Our company is using Apach

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_aspdotnet

Derek Cordon wrote: > Bill, > > Thanks for the response. I am pleased to hear that it has not been > retired. Can you give me any indication of when an update will be > officially released that will allow me to control the .NET Framework version > that is used? Not by the ASF. You can certain

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error with apache 2.2.3 --with-ssl

Well it seems autoconf is borked on your box, because it should be test compiling to determine if X509_STORE_CTX_set_depth is exported from OpenSSL. Apparently not, on your build, but autoconf decides it is successful. You can try forcing the ac_cv_ flag for HAVE_X509_STORE_CTX_SET_DEPTH, I don't

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet Explorer : Adding Apache Reverse Proxy toTrusted Sites improves SSL performance

ABAPGUY wrote: > Hi all, > experimenting with speeding up https performance I > added our Apache Reverse Proxy to the Trusted Sites in > Internet Explorer ..and suddenly https performance > increased . I expect this was due to the browser > suddenly using Low Security settings and I guess could > e

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WinXP apache config

Jayabalan_Aaron wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Im running Apache/1.3.34 (Win32) PHP/5.1.6 on winXP. Oh, so sorry to hear that. God bless and god speed to you. > Accessing pages i develop is possible from localhost, but when i > move on to another machine on my intranet.And try to view the websi

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Trouble with long file names'.

Flip to the table format and you'll avoid char width issues too. IndexOptions HTMLTable Stepan Yakovenko wrote: > Hello! > > I've got a problem: directories' names do not fit: > >Index of /vsv2 > >Icon Name Last modified Size Description > >[DIR] Parent Directory - >[DIR] Авто

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SSL Support

Odd, the downloads page README states "" "The -win32-x86-no_ssl.msi package does not include any encryption software OpenSSL, mod_ssl, nor an https: enabled abs utility. At this time, the process to follow for export notification has not been finalized. Until that time, the -win32-x86-

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] step by step instructions for compiling Apache under Windows

This is really dodgy advice - download the MSVC 8 (2005) runtime installer directly from Microsoft and install it. Issue solved. If you are running the debug build, you have to do the -same thing- only you will find the debug MSVC runtime in your product tree, again, just install it. toadie D w

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: RE: Apache/2.0.55 (Win32) PHP/5.1.1 problem

5.2.0 released last week. Use it. clb wrote: > Okay, I know I took this out of context, but I was casually reading along and > gulped hard when I read this part about PHP > 5.1.1 and Apache 2.2.x. Is this limited to Win32? I ask because I have Apache > 2.2.3 with PHP 5.1.6 and MySQL 4.1.13 runn

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] index.html.en not loaded when index.html fetched

Look at dozens of Include directives that refer to conf/extra/httpd-XXX.conf and you'll find the matching extra/httpd-XXX.conf for many features that are now off-by-default. Just uncomment the corresponding include directive to enable the functionality. Jevan wrote: > I've downloaded the latest v

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Where are all the accepts?

Arthur Kreitman wrote: > The client is actually a WinInet (Microsoft's magic internet library) > application. Its sets INTERNET_FLAG_EXISTING_CONNECT but doesn't set > INTERNET_FLAG_KEEP_CONNECTION (the keep alive flag). In HTTP 1.0 keep alive didn't exist, then it did, but defaulted to false.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CGI app held open

Nathan Kellogg wrote: > We are debugging a CGI app ( mod_isapi ) running on a WINxp machine. Just so you are clear, ISAPI is not CGI - CGI describes a way to launch a program (or script, via a program) passing environment variables to describe the request, and listening to the stdout of the prog

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tuning the MaxKeepAliveRequests and KeepAliveTimeout http.conf parameters

Arthur Kreitman wrote: > > I noticed a random but all to frequent (perhaps 1 or 2 or 3 for every > few hundred http requests) error from ap_core_output_filter (about line > 903 in core_filters.c). The error is an os 10054 “An existing > connection was forcibly closed by the remote host”. At th

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reverse Proxy woes

"The backend image server is running IIS6" IIS speaks http:, only Tomcat (and perhaps some Tomcat derived app servers) can speak ajp:. Rodolfo Rosado wrote: > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 4:39 PM > To: us

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CGI app held open

You could patch it to watch the refcount drop to zero. Since httpd only supports isapi to ease use and migration to httpd - it was never really a 'development platform' for isapi - the hack to throw away the now-unused .dll is left as an exercise to the reader. Nathan Kellogg wrote: > I see your

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PHP module + Apache 2 problem

Try either OpenSA's or PHP's lists. It looks like your php_msql wasn't compiled against the php4ts.dll you installed (it shouldn't have to -find- php4ts.dll since that was loaded into memory with mod_php4.dll). Definately not a support issue that we can handle here - talk to whoever built the bin

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is there a way to limit a site's simultaneous access?

No. Run multiple instances of httpd against different IP addresses. There's no way to decide about accepting per-named-host. Chuck Rock wrote: > I have a site that uses up all my apache slots occasionally. This leaves all > the other sites on that server unable to access. > > Does anyone know

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is there a way to limit a site's simultaneous access?

Ivan Barrera A. wrote: > William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >> No. Run multiple instances of httpd against different IP addresses. >> >> There's no way to decide about accepting per-named-host. > > There are some third party modules that can do it. > I only wrote for

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 monitor

Lucuk, Pete wrote: > > I would like to setup something that would… > > - if Apache is down, bring it back up ASAP Uhm - guy I'm not sure you understand how httpd works. Apache has a parent which doesn't ever serve requests. It starts and manages workers. If the workers crash or exit,

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changing DocumentRoot Doesn't Work

Gaming Mouse wrote: > I've installed Apache 2.2 as a manual server (ie, I have to open the > httpd.exe command window to use it) on Win XP Pro. > DocumentRoot E:/Documents/htdocs/bj > Ok - that much looks good. > I then close the httpd.exe window and reopen it -- to restart apache. > > I have

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache quit on me all of a sudden?

You replaced your installed version of OpenSSL, or are trying to start the wrong copy of httpd. You might want to do some searching for multiple occurances of the httpd binary. The fact that SSLEngine isn't recognized indicates a pre-0.9.7 version of OpenSSL, or a different build of httpd. Evan

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changing DocumentRoot Doesn't Work

Steve Swift wrote: > You said that you were double-clicking the httpd.exe > That would make the current directory: > C:\Program Fiels\Apache Software Foundation\Apache 2.2\bin > > so apache would go looking for a conf subdirectory of \bin and not find it. The behavior of httpd is to look in ../co

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changing DocumentRoot Doesn't Work

Steve Swift wrote: >> The behavior of httpd is to look in ../conf/ so that's probably not it. > > That's as may be, but the OP ran httpd.exe -V and got: > -D SERVER_CONFIG_FILE="conf/httpd.conf" The reason is it's conditional on the CWD - NOT the binary path (argv[0]'ish thing). SO... because

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows installation error

Lawrence Weathers, Ph.D. wrote: > > (OS 10048)Only one usage of each socket address (protocol/network > address/port) > is normally permitted. : make_sock: could not bind to address 0.0.0.0:80 > no listening sockets available, shutting down > > What is it trying to tell me and what should I do

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache serves cgi error as application/x-perl

Boyle Owen wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Tony van der Hoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> This must obviously be a problem with my configuration, but >> having fiddled >>> about for a few days, I've not progressed much further. Changing the >>> mime.types file for .pl to text/html

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache serves cgi error as application/x-perl

Joshua Slive wrote: > > Or it could be this: > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37938 Thanks Joshua - looks like something I've heard rumor of with mod_isapi, as well. Appreciate the pointer. - The official Use

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 1.3 on Windows stats

Christian Toledo wrote: > Would anyone know where I can get some numbers on market coverage for > Apache? We run an Apache 1.3 on Win32 environment (a nightmare to > support) and would like to know how popular is the Apache 2.x on Win32 > platform. Besides the warm & fuzzy feeling of recommending t

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 1.3 on Windows stats

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Christian Toledo wrote: >> Would anyone know where I can get some numbers on market coverage for >> Apache? > > You can buy this specific level of detail from either securityspace or from > netcraft, but the general adoption rate of 2.0/2.2 v

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Release date for Apache 2.0.60?

Richard de Vries wrote: > I was just curious if anyone knew when we can expect > Apache 2.0.60. Is this right around the corner, or > still several months out? There are no plans whatsoever. I wouldn't worry yourself about it when 2.2.3 is current, 2.2.4 is around the corner and only 2.2.x and th

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to extend the Protocol when using SSL?

See Connection-Upgrade, but it won't solve your problem. The upgrade request is just that, one request; you still won't be able to add your headers. If you are a proxy, have the app continue to create an http: request, and do the https: request to the apache back end from your proxy. Michael Sta

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_isapi

Nathan Kellogg wrote: > > I have no capability to compile the 2.2.4 mod_isapi ( > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/modules/arch/win32/ Unfortunately, the change isn't committed yet - until I've finished testing it against all my reference ISAPI modules. (Sorry I hadn't

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing Apache as a service

Better yet, try cd "\Program Files\Apache Software Foundation\Apache2.2\bin" first. Or add it to your path. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Try httpd.exe. > > - Original Message > From: servandomontero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Sent: Wednesday, January 3, 2007 1:49

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Building Static Apache on AIX 5.2 with GCC

Vidiot wrote: >> The issue here is that the library Apache is dependent on is installed >> with gcc, so the only way for me to get it is to install the gcc RPM. >> Do you keep gcc libraries on your boxes? >> >> One such library dependency is >> /opt/freeware/lib/gcc/powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0/4.0.0/lib

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Building Static Apache on AIX 5.2 with GCC

Vidiot wrote: >> You don't know that - AIX commonly uses .a for dynamically loadable modules. >> Some mean SOBs like myself force our builds to generate .so in spite of IBM's >> absurd naming conventions. > > Really? Using .a names for dynamic libraries would drive me insane. > At least BSD, Sola

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_isapi

Nathan Kellogg wrote: > Happy new year! And happy new year to all mod_isapi users. > We have been stuck in mid migration for a couple months now and are in > need of some help. I understand from WROWE that the 2.2.4 version of > mod_isapi should address the problems we are having; the 2.2.3 vers

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_isapi

If anyone else has a chance to vet this, there aren't alot of httpd devs with Win32 setups, never mind installed test ISAPI apps. Prompt feedback is desired so this fix can make it into 2.2.4. Thanks! Bill Nathan Kellogg wrote: > This resolved the issues we were having , thanks very much! > >

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pool usage for opening log files

You'll have more luck with programming API questions on [EMAIL PROTECTED], since [EMAIL PROTECTED] is more tuned in with deploying and configuring the server. Arthur Kreitman wrote: > This is under 2.2.2 under Windows. > > > > I need to periodically rename the error and access logs. I’ve n

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: 2.2 default conf rearranged (was: International Characters?)

Are you moving to 2.2? Notice a large number of commented-out, optional #Includes directives; these apply to all sorts of features, grouped by facility, that you might need to invoke on your installation. Or, migrate your existing conf. Jay Chandler wrote: > Howdy. > > On one of our servers, in

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Question on Apache 2.2.4

Graham Frank wrote: > > Why does it always mention the Event MPM? The changelog makes no mention of > any changes to the Event MPM, and the Event MPM documents page still lists > it as experimental. The experiment was introduced in 2.2.x (actually in 2.1.x, after the 2.0.x series). So although

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Embedding Apache HTTP Server

FYI - modules-dev@httpd.apache.org is more attuned to folks doing source code and binary interoperability experiments like this. You might get better answers there. Sreejith wrote: > Hi all, > > I am looking to embed Apache HTTP server in my C Program, so that I > can programtically create vir

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Daylight Savings 2007

John Flores wrote: > Hi I have two verions of apache running 1.3 and 2.0. I am concerned > about the change in Daylight Savings Times in 2007. Is there a patch > that is needed to accomodate this change for my versions of apache. If > so, can you tell me where I can find the patch and intallatio

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Documentation for TypesConfig

Peter Michaux wrote: > > The documentation for TypesConfig directive says that the filename is > relative to ServerRoot. > > I am using an absolute path for the filename parameter and it seems to > work fine. So it should. > Should the docs be changed to include this possibility? No. All dire

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] FollowSymLinks in sub-directory

Nathan Kellogg wrote: > > We are trying to use the following config to allow a listing of files in > the /htdocs/buslist/ directory but not in the /htdocs/ directory. The config you cited was apropos of nothing. Look into Options Indexes at http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/core.html#options

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >