Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Allow HTTP DELETE method?

Whoa dude! mod_dav is 'compatible with httpd 1.3.6 and FORWARD'. My god, don't even think about running 1.3.6!!! It will build and run fine with 1.3.33. You either have to add a module which provides DELETE, or mod_dav. You seem to ignore his answer; Joshua explicitly told you that Apache htt

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Virtual Hosts on 127.0.0.*

Joshua Slive wrote: On 2/10/06, Diona Kidd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (98)Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind to address 127.0.0.10:80 no listening sockets available, shutting down Unable to open logs What am I missing? I'm running Debian 3.1, no iptable rules configured, no fire

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] busy error logs

See Sean's answer, ignore the comment below; all it does is hang the server and cause it provide no respose to the client for not-found errors. David Salisbury wrote: I'll take a stab. I'm guessing you could doing something along the lines of ErrorDocument 404 /dev/null if you're on a unix t

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: I try a contact

I'm betting he grabbed an .msi which was corrupted, and further he's running antivirus software which is known to pollute the otherwise functional Win32 socket stack. Bill Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: I can't make head nor tail out of this. Is there anyone here who speaks Japanese who might

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2 on OS X 10.4

If it's crashing, can you give us the gdb backtrace of the offending (failed) thread? One gentle pointer, you need to use a unix filesystem rather than the Mac filesystem to ensure case sensitivity, or be extremely careful securing resources. An update to APR in the next month and to httpd over

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Muliple Configure Warninings

The origin of these a less-than-optimal Autoconf package installed on your machine, I suggest you might want to upload a more recent version and re- ./buildconf. None of these appears to harm the resulting package. Joshua Slive wrote: On 2/19/06, David Gitman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PidFile tag in httpd.conf for Apache 2.2

Please NEVER crosspost to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please choose one or the other :) Vengal, Thomas (OpenViewR&D) wrote: The line "PidFile logs/httpd.pid" used to exist in all versions Apache HTTP Server prior to 2.2.0 version. Any specific reason as to why this was removed from httpd.conf for Apache

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apachectl and multiple daemons

Nick Kew wrote: On Wednesday 22 February 2006 21:23, Richard de Vries wrote: I have the need to run multiple daemons off of the same apache base install. Erm, why? Why not? Each daemon will have it's own configuration file of course, but since they are all configured pretty much the same

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Images / files partially loading?

Evan Platt wrote: At 05:32 PM 2/22/2006, you wrote: Observation 1: "C:\>" hints strongly at an environment littered with overwhelming numbers of products that mess with your networking (firewalls, viruses, antivirus, etc). Ohhh I get it, a jab at a windows user. :-D No, it's actually a stat

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] When will Win32 be released for Apache 2.2?

Shap Wolf wrote: Any ideas on when Apache 2.2.0 will be compiled for the Win32 platform? I having some small but recurring problems with php5 and mysql that I think are resolved in the latest Apache build, but am not up to compiling it myself. Never, as 2.2.0 was sub-stable w.r.t. proxy and not

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Forbidden

Isn't 10.10.10. safer than 10.10.10 - given that the later syntax can lead to matching 10.10.10x.xxx - a result that wasn't expected? Bill Joshua Slive wrote: On 2/27/06, Jonathan S. Abrams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is it possible to use wildcards with IP addresses in that directive? Could

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Forbidden

Joshua Slive wrote: On 2/27/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Isn't 10.10.10. safer than 10.10.10 - given that the later syntax can lead to matching 10.10.10x.xxx - a result that wasn't expected? I believe the use of apr_ipsubnet_test in mod_access mean

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Can Apache2 cache HTTPS content?

??? You can cache responses for the HTTP protocol over HTTPS. HOWEVER, if you are a proxy, and the user is using proxy CONNECT method to tunnel -through- your server to a backend SSL server, then no, your proxy sees only encrypted data, and cannot do anything with it. Xuekun Hu wrote: I googl

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] OS Env variables - TMP

Apache doesn't perform environment expansion from the core distribution. Look at mod_macro, see if anyone's ported this to apache 2.x for your purposes. Portable syntax is '$SystemRoot' (or '$(SystemRoot)' - either is sans ' tic marks in actual use.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tx for your answer

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.55 Windows install

.dll, .so, .ocx, .cpl, .scr, .nls. They are ALL dynamic libraries, the filename is irrelevant. It only helps you to distinguish one type of module from another. So .so is a perfectly logical associate for apache modules. Apache can only load an 'apache module' - e.g. a module with an exported F

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.55 Windows install

the Apache HTTP Server 2.0.x version. Thomas -Original Message----- From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 10:51 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.55 Windows install .dll, .so, .ocx, .cpl, .scr, .

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newbie with Install Problem

http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/TROUBLESHOOTING.html /me ponders if this could be made any louder or more obvious Bill Carmon Colvin wrote: List, I am trying to install Apache HTTP Server 2.0.55 on to Windows 2000 Pro using the MSI installer. The installation wizard opens wi

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: HTTPd 2.2 Binaries

Grayson Mixon wrote: I saw that the Windows source code has been released for Apache Web Server 2.2, but I don't see the binaries for Windows. When will those be available? There are some external builds of 2.2.0 created outside of the ASF. To answer your question from the httpd project, the

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] infinite subdirectories with webdav and windows

Martin Marcher wrote: Hello, deathening silence here, are my mails actually sent or is it simply the case that I didn't see the obvious and you are not answering me? Hmmm... more tactful ways to word a 'ping, please respond' plea. On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 11:14:56AM +0100, Martin Marcher

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SSI not working in Frame on new install of Apache

Lineberger, Aaron wrote: It would seem that there is a slight difference between Apache 2.0.40 and 2.2.0 whereas the earlier version does not require the .txt extension be included in the AddOutputFilter INCLUDES. After adding it in the 2.2.0 configuration, things began working again. The onl

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] libexpat error during make

Sean Carey wrote: HOT DAMN Thats was it! Thanks for the help. On 3/20/06, TAYLOR, TIM (CONTRACTOR) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I believe it has to do with symbolic links. It has been a couple of years that I ran into this. It should be well documented "somewhere". I only faintly remember somet

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2 - how to disable "dummy internal connection" requests?

Joshua Slive wrote: On 3/19/06, Alexey Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm using Apache 2.2, and it makes a lot of "dummy internal connection" requests. Is there a way to disable this? Not without changing mpms. But they are there for a good reason and they do no harm, so why bother? (I

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] php crashes with msyql

Noah Silverman wrote: Hello, I have a mission critical problem that I cant seem to solve. Can anyone help?? I'll even offer $100 paypal if someone gives me the answer to solve this issue. You don't enable zts so I seriously doubt your php is threadsafe; you configure httpd without speci

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] php crashes with msyql

Noah Silverman wrote: Hello, I have a mission critical problem that I cant seem to solve. Can anyone help?? I'll even offer $100 paypal if someone gives me the answer to solve this issue. Noah - do this again and will simply unsub you from at least the apache.org lists, and I'm sure the

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] php crashes with msyql

Noah Silverman wrote: This was going to be a simple task of updating apache to 2.2. Noah - from the Apache side of this coin, if this is mission critical, why go with the bleeding edge / dot-zero release? Why not stay at something proven, and attempt to change gears at the last minute, which

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installation Issue

No. You have a 21 byte file coming back. Check your PHP config. You might want to obtain hobbit's netcat (nc) command line utility, or use telnet, to connect to localhost port 80 and then GET /index.php HTTP/1.0 Host: localhost (with a blank line after Host: line) to see the exact bytes the s

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Documentroot does not redirect...

Boyle Owen wrote: From: Mark Van Crombrugge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Documentroot /var/www/html/website First, spell the directive correctly... ie, "DocumentRoot". FWIW - the directive itself is case-insensitive, as are -most- arguments other than path/resource names. -

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing Apache 2.2.0 on AMD Opteron running SuSE 10

Jennifer wrote: P.S. Just for an experiment, I compiled Apache 2.0.55 on the same machine with same OS, and I was able to compile and install Apache 2.0.55 successfully without any problem. Just so you are clear, when you built 2.0 - I suspect you built for 32 bits. When you tried to build

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing Apache 2.2.0 on AMD Opteron running SuSE 10

Alexey Polyakov wrote: Sorry for the offtopic, I was always wondering (even since Apache 1.3) - why does it require expat even in minimal installs? I thought expat is XML parsing library... Three letters... DAV If you inspect a webdav request, you will see that the actual payload moves from t

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing Apache 2.2.0 on AMD Opteron running SuSE 10

Alexey Polyakov wrote: On 4/15/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Three letters... DAV If you inspect a webdav request, you will see that the actual payload moves from the traditional 'http headers' into a metadata xml stream. Hm, I thought that Apache doe

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Q: How to compile Apache with dmake under Windows using MinGW

Ron Savage wrote: Hi Folks In the archives I see a discussion back in 2002 about this. Did anything come of it? A makefile acceptable to dmake and MinGW would be ideal. It's a puzzle inside a riddle. Ron, you might want to jump over to [EMAIL PROTECTED] where there's ongoing discussion an

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SHARED_CORE

Krist van Besien wrote: It apears that compiling using the "SHARED_CORE" rule involves adding the --enable-rule=SHARED_CORE to the configure command's options. What I would like to know is though, what this does. Does this mean I can provide the httpd daemon with an additional directory to loa

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DocumentRoot cpnfiguration

Apache doesn't accept it because Y: doesn't exist in the service for the user you are running apache as. Workaround might be a very wordy path, or perhaps you can set the apache service to depend on the ext2fsd service, if such that program runs as a service. NORBbI wrote: Hi everybody, I have

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Security scanners.

Sean Conner wrote: [2] Actually, I do know of some, but they're the software programs that are currently trying to break in through an insecure webserver or CGI scripts. You can check your web logfiles and see plenty of those happening. If any of those requests are

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] intercept incoming requests in Apache Web Server

Well, if you are using QoS you are using Windows, which means you want to delve into mpm_winnt.c - the mpm flavor on that platform. Much of the networking there is raw windows api, as opposed to using apr. If you want to be quite thorough, and are very familiar with QoS, there has been some mumb

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache HTTP Server 2.2.2 Released

Yevgen Borodin wrote: Why couldn't there be a stable 2.2.2 Win32 Apache release? So tired of random bugs in 2.0.55... :( Because Apache HTTP Server is a source code development project. We don't exist to help users of any specific platform. Binaries are provided at the convenience of a contri

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache HTTP Server 2.2.2 Released

Graham Frank wrote: What about the event MPM? They list it as changed in the core enhancements, but it is still an experimental MPM. What's keeping it out of the production circuit? Primarilly because it's bleeding edge. Not serrated-knife style as perchild was - but simply not widely adopte

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache HTTP Server 2.2.2 Released

Nick Kew wrote: On Monday 01 May 2006 08:15, Graham Frank wrote: What about the event MPM? They list it as changed in the core enhancements, but it is still an experimental MPM. What's keeping it out of the production circuit? IMO removing the "experimental" branch from normal modules was a

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache HTTP Server 2.2.2 Released

Graham Frank wrote: Give it a whirl, ey? Oh how tempting ... Worker peaks at 800 workers in the daytime. I could definantly give event a whirl if I were willing to place it onto a mission critical web server. Hell, why not? It wouldn't be the most psychotic thing I've done in recent histor

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ASP on Apache

No. Learn ASP.NET a nn wrote: Hello How do I enable ASP on Apache server 2.0? Is it possible at all? Thank you Artem Nehamkin Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: [Question] How to write driver to test my module for Unit Test?

Okamoto Toshiaki wrote: I have solved following problem by myself. They are a little difficult because that register HOOK Functions are MACRO. You'll have trouble here getting answers to most any development questions, as this list is user-oriented. You might try the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list for

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ASP on Apache

Sascha Kersken wrote: Hi, You actually have to buy another piece of software to support ASP.NET under Linux with Apache. I don't remember the name of the software. That's mod_adpdotnet which you don't actually have to buy because it's free software under the terms of the Apache Software Lic

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.58 for Windows?

Savage, Robert CTR USTRANSCOM J6 wrote: I see that v2.0.58 has been released (just as André Malo predicted it would), but apparently only for UNIX. Does anyone have any idea when a MSI build for Windows might be posted? Need a handwritten postcard on engraved stationary to look? It's been th

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.58 for Windows?

Savage, Robert CTR USTRANSCOM J6 wrote: A simple http://apache.edgescape.com/httpd/binaries/win32/ would have been sufficient. According to http://apache.edgescape.com/httpd/binaries/win32/#released, v2.0.55 is still the current release. Yes, mea culpa. The language change necessitated by -win

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache HTTP Server 2.2.2 Released

Schultz, Gary - COMM wrote: I know there are great people out there building great Win32 Apache 2.2.x binaries, but the problem is that some IT managers, like mine, want a stable Win32 Apache from the Apache Software Foundation. So we will continue with 2.0.55 until the ASF releases a stable Win3

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows compile of Apache 2.0.58 with SSL fails

Awww drat ... the warning on mod_ssl.dep was expected, it was deleted to avoid the discrepancies between different openssl include trees. Unfortunately I didn't see this. It's a packaging problem, ergo I'll repackage. Simply del support\abs.dep Sorry, Bill hunter wrote: I tried compiling Ap

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Building Win32 2.2.2 Yourself

Joost de Heer wrote: I'll chime in here a little :) Off hand, I can't think of anyone else who was building Apache 2.2.0 on Windows apart from wrowe and myself, Steffen from Apachelounge provides compiled 2.2.x binaries. (http://www.apachelounge.com, you have to register to be able to download

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] problem installing apache2.0.55 on Soalris 10

Please note that httpd is doing a progressively worse job of building with the included apr (-util) subpackages once you've installed apr (-util) on the box. So I really suggest you jump into srclib/apr, using whatever --prefix you prefer (it can be /usr/local/apache2/ if you like), ./Configure,

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] check_forensic for Solaris 10?

Mike VanHorn wrote: Is there somewhere that I can download the check_forensic script for use on a Solaris 10 x86 machine? I am getting a bunch of Look in your source tarball under support/ It's a vanilla shell script; platform neutral, needs trap/cut/(e)grep/join/sed and xargs, none of them ve

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Building Win32 2.2.2 Yourself

hunter wrote: I got a reasonably clean build today with Apache 2.2.2 buy switching from VC6 to VC7. Prior to this I could not figure out how to find an LDAP 3.0 SDK. It's out there but no longer downloadable. Notes will be updated this weekend, but the PITA is that Microsoft pulled down the

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] problem with authnz-ldap (httpd 2.2.0, FreeBSD 6.1)

Rassilka wrote: Hi! When i compile, all good. But, when i try start apache, i receive this error First jump to the 2.2.2 bundle. Update the apr, then the apr-util, seperately (httpd+apr isn't doing a consistent job of this anymore.) Make certain that you configure apr-util --with-ldap. Let u

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] problem with authnz-ldap (httpd 2.2.0, FreeBSD 6.1)

Did you make/make install? Drop in the right --prefix, that should refresh the apr util ldap .h headers that are causing you grief. What's the output (truncated, please) of trying to detect/configure for ldap? Rassilka wrote: Hi! When i compile, all good. But, when i try start apache, i receiv

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] why do I get a 304 when I replace a file with a changed version?

Jennifer R. Lee wrote: If I use windows xcopy command, copy command, drag and drop or even the unix toolkit mv command to swap these two files and then launch a.htm, Apache acts as if there was no change, and sends a 304 every time the TTL expires Just a wild observation, but xcopy/copy/etc a

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ftp Icons problem.

Vincent Blondel wrote: You are right and this is exactly what I would like to have. So if I understand you, it is impossible to ask apache to behave, in forward configurations, as some web browsers (like firefox) during ftp connections or in other words to transform the ftp output in a nice htm

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Re: ASP on Apache

> I think that I will try mod_adpdotnet. Is it easy to install mods? Do mod_adpdotnet support asp? It's easy to install mod_aspdotnet. As we've told you several times the free solutions don't support Microsoft ASP pages. Several options exist for ASP.NET, or writing your ASP pages in perl. -

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newbee Manual for Apache on Windows XP

Nils-Börje Eklöf wrote: I am running a Widows XP pro system and trying to set up a webserver. I have downloaded these files apache_2.2.2-win32-x86-no_ssl.msi ok, why these below? apache_2.2.2-win32-x86-symbols.zip httpd-2.2.2-win32-src.zip httpd-2.2.2-win32-src.zip.asc.txt httpd-2.2.2-win32

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] php5apache2.dll

Bill Angus wrote: Anybody know the proper install for PHP5 under Apache 2.2 for Windows? I had to comment out my PHP installation line in config... #LoadModule php5_module "C:/Php/php5apache2.dll" The line worked fine in config file for apache 2.0.55. *Read* release notes/announcements care

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: UTF-8 (was Accents problem with Apache 2 under windows)

It's a localization issue. 1.3.x used your local code page, whatever that might have been. Move files to another machine configured differently, and they wouldn't be served. 2.0.x uses unicode file names - whatever filename you see in the file explorer is exactly what you see on the site. Most

[cli-users] Announcement; cli-users@ List Folding into dev@ on May 15

CLI-USERS@ community, this note is to let you know about some major changes coming up here over the next week. Effective on Monday, May 15th, cli-users@ traffic will all move into the general community of users@httpd.apache.org, with this list closing. You can email [EMAIL PROTECTED] to join th

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache2.2.2 - appropriate APR libraries

It shouldn't be saying 1.2.7 - the 1.2.12 releases are out. Our bad. Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to source the appropriate APR libraries for the binary build of the Apache 2.2.2 installation... http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/new_features_2_2.html#module indicates that Apache 2.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache2.2.2 - appropriate APR libraries

s Yes. They also happen to be bundled in 2.2.2 httpd sources, so you really shouldn't have to go out and grab them seperately. They will build in-tree when you do a win32 httpd binary build. apr-iconv remains at 1.1.1 for the moment, also bundled in the -win32-src.zip package of httpd-2.2.2

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can't connect to Apache HTTP server on Windows XP machine from a different machine on LAN

You are running firewall software kartikay malhotra wrote: Hi All! I am both a windows and Linux user. Previously I installed Apache HTTP Server for Linux. It works like a dream. I can connect to HTTP Server on my local machine from any machine on my LAN. I tried the same with windows. I do

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PCRE issue with Apache 2.0.54 (Debian)

Bill Jones wrote: On 5/13/06, Brad Greenlee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm trying to have everything on one site be protected with basic auth, except for requests starting with /foo. This should work, but it doesn't: do anything? ---

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ASPDotNet

Vic Feria wrote: About a week ago I read somewhere that Microsoft is posing to support Apache in its DotNet endeavor. I would like to verify if there is any truth to this. Does anyone know? If you read this somewhere, I can honestly say it's news to me - and would be somewhat interested in you

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hosting off of Shared Storage

Dan Trainor wrote: I was wanting to see if I could get some feedback in regards to hosting with Apache off of shared storage. Turn off sendfile, mmap, and keep your locks/mutexes on local storage. - The official User-To-User s

[EMAIL PROTECTED] [Announcement] cli-users@httpd.apache.org List Closed

To continue participating in peer-to-peer support for Apache HTTP Server's mod_aspdotnet users, please join us at [EMAIL PROTECTED] users@, please welcome our cli-users. Note that all things on using httpd from the ASF are welcome and on-topic here. Thank you.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SSL Problem Still not Solved in Apache2-RHEL4

Rex Brooks wrote: I have Apache2 in RHEL4, so I am assuming that the SSL Sections you refer to are in ssl.conf which is loaded as a DSO. I understand that httpd must be able to read the crt/pem file. I did specify a pass phrase when I created the key/crt. However, I do not get a request ask

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Processor usage

Bill Jones wrote: On 5/16/06, Mario Henley Becerril Geldis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all, I have a box with Winbugs 2003(win 2003) and apache http server that have 4 processors , the performance monitor report that the third processor have usage of 85%, rest of processor have a usage

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ASPDotNet

Vic Feria wrote: Anything new in the development of mod_aspdotnet? Yes - on the ASF side, most folks are using the snapshot, not a release, which is usually a good sign that the snapshot is ready for release. I'm rolling 2.0.0.4 (last is the release sequence) and 2.2.0.4 binaries to run in htt

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache with SSL

apachectl does something like . bin/envvars; bin/httpd to load the path variables. You can't start httpd w/o it. Kaushal Shriyan wrote: Hi All Anyone - when I try starting Apache directly (outsie of samon using: apachectl sslstart) I get the error: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache]$ ./bin/apachectl

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is Apache mod_aspdotnet alive?

Oluwatope Akinniyi wrote: Yes. I use mod_mono on my linux boxes. But are you saying mod_mono is the replacement of mod_aspdotnet? An alternative to mod_aspdotnet PLUS Microsoft ASP.NET. mod_mono does not speak to the MS implementation of ASP.NET, but rolls its own. But even, mod_mono is not

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ASPDotNet

Vic Feria wrote: I do not understand MONO. Is this parallel to your effort? I do like the simplicity of your module (e.g. straight forward implementation into Apache). I know a lot of users will be heart-broken if you cease the effort. It's not a 'choice' - either enough developers participate

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] piped log on Windows 2003 doesn't work

Have you enabled some exception handling that would bypass exceptions on cin? cin should be closed on the write end of the pipe, before or as the parent process exits. The only way this would fail is if somehow the write end of the pipe is inhereted by the child process. Launching your program

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Running bash scripts from a browser through Apache

enable cgi - that's all there is to it. P Karthick wrote: Hi All, Is there any way to run Bash shell scripts from a browser passed through Apache. This is exactly like executing a perl script through mod_perl module. E.g. http://myhost/dir1/myscript.sh If we hit the link,the script should

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Error - Compile JK2 on AIX

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am trying to compile Jakarta Connector JK2 on IBM AIX 5.2 server. I hits the following error during the compilation: That's bad since JK2 is abandoned. There is much development on mod_jk which is what you should obtain and install (version 1.2.14 or later is quite

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Disable Method TRACE

See the docs, TraceEnable is your friend. but why you want to disable your own debugging feature is beyond me. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to disable http method TRACE from my apache webserver on z/linux (we have apache 2.2 not IBM http server powered by apache!) I tried with thes

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Where to download a windows executable installation version of Apache 1.3.12 ?

Sean Conner wrote: Why would you want to go back in time? Any number of reasons, including size restrictions, custom modules that haven't been ported to 2.x, support issues, etc. etc. A burning desire to expose oneself to security problems? http://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_13

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Getting Apache to use PHP under Window XP

WDaquell wrote: Have you tried putting PHP.ini in your Windows folder? I had to do that before PHP would work on my system. The phpinidir directive helps too (fwiw - it's the DIR not including 'php.ini' filename). - The offici

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Getting Apache to use PHP under Window XP

Martyn Griffin wrote: I even pulled the dll out of the distribution zip file again and retried and it still fails. If anyone has this running (PHP 5.1.4 and Apache 2.2), could you show the relevant entries from your .conf file etc. Using the version ***compiled for*** apache 2.2? If is was

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Getting Apache to use PHP under Window XP

, if the PHP 5.1.4 release WON'T work with Apache 2.2.2, I would like to find where the correct combination is defined? Martyn T. Griffin -----Original Message- From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 8:41 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd authentication

Apache MD5 hashes are refolded in such a way that they are expected but not proven to be less breakable than a straight MD5 hash, and most certainly expected to be less reducable than direct MD5 collision prediction. However, a straight (not refolded) flavor of SHA1 is also available and you woul

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] registered domain name question

Charlie Moher wrote: Please remove me from your mailing list immediately. Thank you. Please follow the directions to remove yourself. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://htt

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] VirtualHost

Charlie Moher wrote: > Please remove me from your mailing list immediately. Thank you. Please follow the directions to remove yourself. > - > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. > See http:

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy_ajp (mod_rewrite) with ssl

Charlie Moher wrote: > Please remove me from your mailing list immediately. Thank you. Please follow the directions to remove yourself. > - > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. > See http:

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Two questions

Charlie Moher wrote: > Please remove me from your mailing list immediately. Thank you. Please follow the directions to remove yourself. > - > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. > See http:

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can I have "fake" URLs with mod_rewrite???

Charlie Moher wrote: > Please remove me from your mailing list immediately. Thank you. Please follow the directions to remove yourself. > - > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. > See http:

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can I have "fake" URLs with mod_rewrite???

Charlie Moher wrote: > Please remove me from your mailing list immediately. Thank you. Please follow the directions to remove yourself. > - > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. > See http:

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http problem

Charlie Moher wrote: > Please remove me from your mailing list immediately. Thank you. Please follow the directions to remove yourself. > - > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. > See http:

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http problem

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Please follow the directions to remove yourself. Sorry folks for this short email flood I just couldn't help myself and have been contemplating trying that since the last one.. I'm having one of those 'morons piss me off' sorts of days (and

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Running multiple httpd daemons

apachectl should not change significantly, why not just leave it alone between minor subversion bumps? Peter N Lewis wrote: On my server, I run the httpd daemon twice, using almost identical httpd.conf files, one on the main port (the live server) and one on a high numbered port (my working dra

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How do I setup personal webpages in non-standard place?

Nick Kew wrote: You can emulate mod_userdir there with an AliasMatch directive. Given the history of the tilde, you'll want to match both /~foo/ and /~7Efoo/. Or drop the tilde from your userdir URLs. Erm, did you mean /%7Efoo/ ? it shouldn't be necessary - I believe aliasmatch is given the

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache Status API

Joshua Slive wrote: On 6/7/06, Bogdan Taru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I would like to query the Apache Status informations (the ones provided by mod_status, for example) from an external program. As well as snmp - perhaps mod_arm4? I have no idea of the state of this source code, it has not

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] disable logs on Windows

loglevel crit the name you are looking for on windows is 'nul' not '/dev/null' (which rudely and promisciously exists in every real directory, so if you mkdir \dev, well...) Viktoras Didziulis wrote: Dear group, is there a simple way (e.g. by editing httpdconf) to disable writing to error

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Password protect... no user required

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What doesn't appear to be explained is how to get around the incoming browser user having to know a username and it is a real username on server. There is some discussion of setting your own usernames but still it would seem to require an incoming browser to supply bo

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.55 on Win2003 crashes when attempting LDAP auth against AD

Dan Buettner wrote: I've got a Windows 2003 Server running Apache 2.0.55 and Active Directory. I am attempting to to use Apache's mod_auth_ldap to control access on a per-directory basis with .htaccess files, by authenticating with LDAP against Active Directory. I can't even run 2.0 ldap with

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] query string from POST method

Check out mod_dumpio, an optional debugging module in 2.0 / 2.2 versions. rturnbull wrote: Hello to all, Is there a way though httpd proxy to "show" the arguments sent with a POST method? I have been trying to find a way to reveal arguments from our java application that are POST method to

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mpm on php

Joshua Slive wrote: On 6/21/06, onin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: there's paragraph like this: - We do not recommend using a threaded MPM in production with Apache2. Use the prefork MPM instead, or use Apache1. For information on why, read the related FAQ entry on using Apache2 with a thr

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mpm on php

Colm MacCarthaigh wrote: On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 12:14:53PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Of course some of us have been using it for those 6 years in worker mode, but I wouldn't expect that caviat emptor to disappear anytime soon. The more things change... I wonder will they ever

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] VirtualHost directive not working after XP SP2 install

It's that hotfix you must have. Then, if it works and listen 80 doesn't behave, I suspect that MS is still treating each loopback IP as disassociated from 'all' 0.0.0.0. So try this instead listen 127.0.0.1:80 listen 127.0.0.2:80 ... listen 127.0.0.5:80 Oh, and take a look at using windows\sys

[EMAIL PROTECTED] BOF? Windows HTTP Technologies, ISAPI, ASP.NET

Serving MS technologies ON Windows with Apache, or for NON-Windows admins needing to serve MS-style content using ISAPI, mono, etc... Do you want or need a Birds of a Feather sessions to discuss issues, and kick around questions and ideas? Please speak up if you want this slotted, I'm going to d

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >