On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Massimiliano De Ruosi
wrote:
> Now I understand, thank you.
>
> Any suggestion about profiling a request using mod_proxy as a reverse proxy?
> Reading mod_proxy documentation I didn't find a useful solution (except
> lowering Timeout/ProxyTimeout to get some informa
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Thomas Eckert
wrote:
> Using a config like this
>
>
> BalancerMember http://backend.example.local status=-SE
>
>
> ServerName frontend.example.local
> SSLProxyEngine On
> RequestHeader set X-Forwarded-Proto http
>
>
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Philippe Marcoussis
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am facing a problem, and i don't known how to solve it.
>
> I have two web sites working and available on the internet :
> - applications.example.com
> - secure.example.com
>
> I would like :
> 1) to allow FULL access FROM
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Tom Evans wrote:
> RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} ^applications.example.com$
> RewriteRule .* - [E=valid_referer:1]
>
> SetEnvIf Referer applications\.example\.com valid_referer=1
Doh! I thought I had removed the mod_rewrite way of setting the
environm
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Jan Vávra wrote:
> Hello,
> I have an idea how to setup Apache for doing load balancer based on
> mod_proxy and mod_balance modules. But in my case the backend server
> requires ssl client certificate authentication and therefore the Apache
> Server cannot termin
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Chris Arnold
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Chris Arnold
> wrote:
>>
>> Apache/2.2.12 (Linux/SUSE). We have a web app that runs under tomcat
>> (8080). We have apache using mod_proxy (80 and 443). According to the tomcat
>> mailing list:
>
>
>>
>> What
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Chris Arnold
wrote:
>>First of all, is "/folder/", "/path/" or "/share/"? You seem to have
>>used them all so far.. please be careful when anonymizing your config
>>that you aren't removing information that is necessary to determine
>>what is wrong
>
> This rea
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:30 PM, trifo wrote:
> Thanks for the replies.
>
> Well, I forget to mention that we run on AIX, not on Linux. And so it is.
> The files MUST be consistent in any moment of time. There is a period of
> time when a lot of pages are changing in every 5 minutes.
The point r
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 8:44 AM, swapnil vaidya
wrote:
> Hi All,
> I have 2 linux machine.
> I have compiled apache 2.4.6 on one of the linux machine with following
> commands:
> ./configure --prefix=/usr/apache--with-ssl=/usr/local/ssl --enable-ssl
> --enable-modules="all" --enable-mods-shared="m
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 2:06 PM, STF wrote:
> I'm not looking for some "IT adventure" if that's what you mean. I have a
> job and I don't have spare time to "explore unknown territories" lol I
> really want to use Apache httpd in windows at the latest version if
> possible.
So use apachelounge
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Borden Rhodes wrote:
> Good morning, list,
>
> After about 7 hours of struggling with this issue, I can't seem to
> find out how to trace the cause of this issue:
>
> I am trying to rewrite absolute URLs using a .htaccess file on my
> computer being served from lo
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Borden Rhodes wrote:
> Thank you for your response, Tom,
>
> You are correct in that I don't expect the server to alter the HTML
> output. I want to tell the server to fetch a file at an arbitrary path
> if it receives a request for an absolute URL. So, for exampl
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Borden Rhodes wrote:
> Good evening,
>
> I thought that I had worded my question clearly. Is there something
> wrong with how I've asked my question or that I'm asking for something
> very unusual?
>
> I'll do my best to give you all of the information you need:
>
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 2:53 AM, Borden Rhodes wrote:
>> Assuming that the above steps accurately represent the exchange
>> between Ff and httpd, am I to understand that there's no way to tell
>> httpd in a .htaccess file at step 3 that a re
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Fester Zigterman Rustenburg
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for posting HTML before.
> Is any one here using mod_fcgid, who has any idea how POST files are handled
> ?
>
> It seems that Ubuntu 12.04 (based on debian 6) does not have my problem
> using Apache 2.2.22, and I
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Kevin Behr wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I have two separate web applications, each on a different Apache (2.2)
> server. A user first authenticates on Server A (either by Basic HTTP or
> LDAP) and gains access to the web application. At some point, the user has
> the
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Charles W Buege wrote:
> All -
>
> I've gotten Apache working with a single Reverse Proxy to both of my web
> servers (much thanks go to Yehuda for your assistance!!), but I'm trying to
> take this to a next step.
>
> Attached, you will find an image with my curren
Hi all
At $JOB we have a web app that generates XML for another web app to
use. Each complete XML document is a list of individual items, and
each item is stored on disk, in gzip format to save space - the format
is overly verbose, and compression is highly effective, and gzip is
nicely transparen
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Riggen, Scott
wrote:
> Current configuration in my vhosts file.
>
>
>
> This is not in a location or directory block. It is in the normal
> virtualhost block
>
> I want my first rewriterule setup so that a user can type in
> https://myserver.mydomain.com/ and it w
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Riggen, Scott
wrote:
> Tom,
>
> I put port# in to indicate that we are using a different port than standard
> on the inside network/server.
> In this case it is an Oracle SOA server on port 7011.
> I can assure you that none of my actual rules contains or begins w
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Jim Borland wrote:
> My server, which is located in the Amazon cloud, was just moved to a new
> location with a new IP address. Nothing else was changed. However, the
> Apache Virtual Host, which has worked flawlessly for several years, is
> broken. Apache serve
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Richard Mixon wrote:
> Jonas/Yehuda,
>
> The example I chose was a bad one, just rushing to get the mail out I guess.
> The vast majority of the requests have a return of 200, with a few 503.
>
Yes, your configuration is not right - you are configuring a reverse
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Savio Chrysostom wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I would like to know if MSI is available for Apache 2.4. If yes, please send
> me the link where I can download it.
The apache project do not release binaries, only source code.
Previously, project volunteers made unofficial
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Mauricio Tavares
> I guess I am more paranoid than many. :)
The internet is noisy and full of terrors.
If you put a server, particularly http server, on the internet and
make it available, people will make all kinds of requests to it - not
necessarily reque
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Joey J wrote:
> Apache 2.4 has had a stable release out for over 2 years but is only used by
> 2.5% of active Apache sites. Why is the adoption so low?? The Apache
> foundation has been recommending upgrading to 2.4 for some time and looking
> at the improvements
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Andy Canfield wrote:
> Last week, if you went to http://www.andycanfield.com, you would see my web
> site. Today, if you go there, you will see "Internal Server Error". Apache
> broke it.
>
> We had four sites on that computer:
> [1] http://210.213.49.151/ took you
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Vladimir Kornea
wrote:
> The server is Apache/2.2.22 (Debian) and the browser is Firefox 30.0,
> but this is a general question. It refers to lines like this in
> /var/log/apache2/error.log:
>
> [Fri Jun 20 17:42:16 2014] [info] [client 67.174.61.70] Request body
>
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Mark jensen wrote:
> I have read about Authoriztion in Apache:
> Require host example.org
> Require host .net example.edu
>
>
> This configuration will cause
> Apache to perform a double reverse DNS lookup on the client IP
> address, regardless of the
.On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 2:52 PM, David Favor wrote:
> A quick test of how fast a single file will serve is to do this.
>
>1) ssh into your machine (you must ssh in for this test for it to be
> accurate)
>
>2) create a 150K file
> net1# dd if=/dev/zero of=output.dat bs=150K count=1
>
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Mark jensen wrote:
> this won't help if the USER is outside the Network and have to use LDAP, it
> is surely doesn't have the IP 192.168.1.2
Break it down who you want to access the location, ie it is unclear
which of these statements is what you want (if any).
1
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:37 AM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we have apaches as reverse proxies for some tomcat and wso2-application
> servers.
>
> We get this error message on a high-load-webserver:
>
> [proxy_http:error] [pid 13256:tid 47013272524544] (11)Resource temporarily
> unavailable: [client 172.3
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:37 AM, wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> we have apaches as reverse proxies for some tomcat and wso2-application
>> servers.
>>
>> We get this error message on a high-load-webserver:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 7:29 AM, Mike Wenzel wrote:
> I got an cgi-script which is creating a file. This file need 775 permissions
> (rwxrwxr-x). I need to get the apache to create this file with 775
> permissions.
>
> I researched, but 90% of all those solutions doesn't work for me or those
> "in
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Igor Cicimov wrote:
>
>> Your .htaccess file:
>> # ALLOW USER BY IP
>> order deny,allow
>> deny from all
>> SetEnvIF X-Forwarded-For "1.2.3.4" AllowIP
>> SetEnvIF X-Forwarded-For "5.6.7.8" AllowIP
>> Allow from env=AllowIP
>> allow from 1.2.3.4
>> allow from 5.6.7.8
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 9:22 PM, Jakov Sosic wrote:
> Hi guys.
>
> I'm running CentOS 6 with latest httpd (2.2.15-31.el6).
>
>
> I've noticed a very peculiar problem with Apache. I have a very high number
> of virtual hosts set up - it's around 501.
>
> Problems started occuring after vhost number
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Rajalakshmi Iyer wrote:
> Ok. Thanks.
>
> Does this situation sound plausible - Keep alive connections are not being
> used effectively by client applications (i.e. subsequent requests on
> keep-alive connections are not frequent enough to keep Apache workers busy
>
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Rose, John B wrote:
> Bummer
>
> Since we want to stick with what is available via "yum" for Red Hat 7
>
> Thanks for the info
>
I doubt the lack of UDS, and having to use FCGI over TCP/IP is what is
causing your load spikes compared to running with mod_php.
More
601 - 637 of 637 matches
Mail list logo
