[us...@httpd] Serving partial data of in-memory common data set

user and serve the user? Appreciate any insights or pointers. Thanks S.A. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more

Re: [us...@httpd] Serving partial data of in-memory common data set

--- On Mon, 7/27/09, Tom Evans wrote: > From: Tom Evans > Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Serving partial data of in-memory common data set > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Date: Monday, July 27, 2009, 1:04 PM > On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 09:01 -0700, > S.A. wrote: > > H

Re: [us...@httpd] Serving partial data of in-memory common data set

; > > > > > > Is there a way that we can retain this data > in-memory > > > and depending on > > > > the requesting user, we read their > configuration and > > > then come to the > > > > in-memory data set and build a page for the >

Re: [us...@httpd] Serving partial data of in-memory common data set

--- On Tue, 7/28/09, Jonathan Zuckerman wrote: Hi Jonathan, > > As I have stated before > > Don't get snippy, I think you are trying to be a mind reader. I was happy for the response I got and was trying to have an impersonal technical discussion. It is unfortunate that you are looking for

Re: [us...@httpd] Serving partial data of in-memory common data set

Hi André, > Concurring with Jonathan about the free advice and the > tenuous relevance to the main list topic, I'd nevertheless > want to try to contribute. Thanks for trying to contribute to the discussion. I have looked at the mailing lists for apache and could not figure out a better forum tha

Re: [us...@httpd] Serving partial data of in-memory common data set

> ... > > We started with 30 concurrent users and there was no > trouble, > > but when the next batch of 70 users hit concurrently, > we could > > not serve all the users. > > > Just a note for now.  The above is an important part, > and maybe you should have started your initial post with > that

Re: [us...@httpd] Serving partial data of in-memory common data set

Hi Jonathan, Thanks for your response > This might not be an option if image access varies based on > privilege > of user (or if every user has unique images), but have you > considered > using a spritemap for the images?  50 http requests > can be non-trivial. Images are in file store, and yes

Re: [us...@httpd] Serving partial data of in-memory common data set

Hi André, > > > > The reason why I am not suspecting mysql was that the > mysql > > log does indicate that it is getting all the requests > and > > it is servicing them. As I have stated before, some of > the > > users though are not getting images. > > > Can you explain this a bit ? When you sa

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Force/add/append/inject HTML to documents (similar to 'Header append') for no archive

Im sure this has been asked before, but I was unable to find a suitable query to search the httpd-users list with: Is it possible to have Apache 2.0.53 to append HTML information to pages as they are being served out? Similar to 'Header append', but for the body? I looked at all of Add* modules

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Force/add/append/inject HTML to documents (similar to 'Header append') for no archive

On Feb 19, Nick Kew ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed: Nick: On Sunday 19 February 2006 01:50, Eugene wrote: Nick: Nick: But not relevant to the question, unless you have hooks in place Nick: (as in SSI). Nick: Nick: > There's also a 3rd-party module Nick: > called mod_layout that does the trick too.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help: CGI not executing outside of /cgi-bin/

Apache 2.0.51 Solaris 9 Im trying to get 1 file, show.cgi, to execute outside of /cgi-bin/ show.cgi (PERL) resides under /foo/bar For now show.cgi is just a "Hi" program. #!/usr/bin/perl -T use strict; use warnings; printf("Content-Type: text/html\n\n");

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Help: CGI not executing outside of /cgi-bin/

On Mar 17, Evan Platt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed: Evan: At 07:17 AM 3/17/2006, you wrote: Evan: Evan: > For most part I know what needs to be added to make this work, but Im Evan: > getting the source code on the screen, instead of the output. Evan: > Evan: > Nothing in the error log; acces

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Help: CGI not executing outside of /cgi-bin/

On Mar 17, David Salisbury ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed: David: You might want to double check that "mod_mine"... is it really yours? David: David: -Dave LMAO! I cant believe it (well actually I can)! Once I corrected the spelling to mod_mime, it worked! Good eye! ---

[EMAIL PROTECTED] OT? Cache-Control

I have in my ssl.conf file Header append Pragma no-cache Header append Cache-Control no-cache Header append Cache-Control no-store Header append Cache-Control private but Im finding that certain NEW versions of IE are not respecting are still caching HTTPS pages

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Odd ... "System error: Element not found."

Here's something I couldnt Google: (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=%22System+error%3A+Element+not+found.%22+Apache&btnG=Search) I went to look at one of my directories, https://concept.temple.edu/css/, and was given the following strange 404 404 Not Found (0x490) error loading file Sys

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Odd ... "System error: Element not found."

Oh! 2.0.53 On Jun 9, S.A. Birl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed: Here's something I couldnt Google: (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=%22System+error%3A+Element+not+found.%22+Apache&btnG=Search) I went to look at one of my directories, https://conce

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Solved: Odd ... "System error: Element not found."

In my ssl.conf I had a ProxyPass & ProxyPassReverse set up for /css Mystery solved. On Jun 9, S.A. Birl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed: Original Post: Return-Path: Original Post: Original Post: Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org, users@httpd.apache.org Original Post: Date: Fri, 9 Jun

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Cyrillic (ISO-8859) information lost during proxy

I was just recently made aware of a problem, which I hope the list can help with: Our 2.0.48 server proxies requests to an IIS server. On the IIS server is a website written in Cyrillic (ISO-8859-5 Im told). I know nothing about Cyrillic as the majority of our websites are in English (and this i

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cyrillic (ISO-8859) information lost during proxy

On Jul 21, S.A. Birl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed: birl: Our 2.0.48 server proxies requests to an IIS server. On the IIS server is birl: a website written in Cyrillic (ISO-8859-5 Im told). I know nothing about birl: Cyrillic as the majority of our websites are in English (and this is the birl

[EMAIL PROTECTED] What is the hierarchy/precedence of 2.0 directives? (Redirect problem)

Hello All: Where can I find (or does anyone know) the order in which Apache preforms its directives? It may or may not solve the underlying problem below, but a recent discussion I had prompted the above question. The underlying problem I have 2 entries in the file proxies.conf

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] What is the hierarchy/precedence of 2.0 directives? (Redirect problem)

On Aug 24, Axel-St?phane SMORGRAV ([EMAIL PROTECTED]: Axel: What do you mean by "URI stays as http://www.temple.edu/mmc/ and not as /sct/mmc/" ?? Do you mean what appears in the address bar is not /sct/mmc? Why would that change? You do not do any redirect! Axel: Axel: Furthermore, because o

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Three 2.0.53 mod_autoindex problems

Hello all: Please direct your attention to http://concept.temple.edu/ There's 3 issues happening: Issue 1) The icons and size columns wont disappear using IndexOptions +SuppressIcon +SuppressSize (and I suspect that if I try to suppress the tags, that will fail too.) Issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED] "malformed header from script" from include files about META tags

Hello all: I searched the archives and could not find an answer: I just upgraded from 2.0.51 to 2.2.3 today and was testing to see if anything might have changed. And it did: I have a file called .header.shtml In said file: Title I have 2 files, index.shtml and rg

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "malformed header from script" from include files about META tags

On Sep 26, 2006, Joshua Slive ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed: Joshua: On 9/26/06, S.A. Birl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Joshua: wrote: Joshua: > Hello all: Joshua: > Joshua: > I searched the archives and could not find an answer: Joshua: > Joshua: > I just upgraded from 2.0.51 t

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "malformed header from script" from include files about META tags

On Sep 26, 2006, S.A. Birl ([EMAIL PROTECTED])...: Birl: When I take out the META tag from .headers.shtml, no error message. I was playing around with .headers.html some more. Seems that Apache doesnt like Thanks Birl Please do not CC me responses to my own posts. I'll rea

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "malformed header from script" from include files about META tags

On Sep 27, 2006, Nick Kew ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed: Nick: On Wednesday 27 September 2006 15:05, S.A. Birl wrote: Nick: > On Sep 26, 2006, S.A. Birl Nick: > ([EMAIL PROTECTED])...: Nick: > Nick: > Birl: When I take out the META tag from .headers.shtml, no error message. Nick

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Serious Memory Leak Problem

I really don't know what the problem could be but let's start a discussion: 1) How many children are there? 2) What is the sum of the processes RSS size? 3) What is the sum of the processes VSIZE size? In other words, run this: #!/usr/bin/perl -w

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Serious Memory Leak Problem

--On Friday, October 21, 2005 11:16 AM -0700 Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: David Tonhofer, m-plify S.A. wrote: I really don't know what the problem could be but let's start a discussion: 1) How many children are there? 2) What is the sum of the processes RSS

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can Anyone Recommend A Log Analyzer?

AFAIK, it's an exploit attempt on an old version of awstats: But if you secure the access with passwords and per-IP rules, you will be safe... "default deny" is always a good idea. Personally, I use the analog (www.analog.cx) log analyzer (never tried aw

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Are some people snooping around? (all the time, actually)

--On Wednesday, November 16, 2005 10:03 AM -0600 Oil Pine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Reviewing the httpd access log, I found the following entries: 69.209.112.92 - - [16/Nov/2005:09:06:46 -0600] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 200 589 "-" "-" 69.209.184.151 - - [16/Nov/2005:06:38:42 -0600] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 2