Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem building 2.2.8 on hpux itanum

2008-02-28 Thread Rush
I'm running into identical problem... Did anyone found solution . if possible can you please email me solution at [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Rush Peter Olofson wrote: > > Any ideas I tried 2.2.6 with the same result/problem > /peo > I'm trying to build on hpux with h

[us...@httpd] proxy: HTTP: disabled connection

2009-10-28 Thread David Rush
I've got httpd 2.2.4 on Windows Server 2003, acting as a reverse proxy to a couple other servers. I'm getting a LOT of "[error] proxy: HTTP: disabled connection for (x.x.x.x)" and some "[Wed Oct 28 12:55:33 2009] [error] (OS 10060)A connection attempt failed because the connected party did

[us...@httpd] Securing some URLs at my Reverse Proxy

2010-03-18 Thread David Rush
I've got a reverse proxy setup using httpd 2.2.8 (on Windoze) on both the rev proxy and the internal (origin) server, along with Tomcat on the origin server with a couple webapps (as .war files) supporting the site. Most of the application is at or near the root (/) of the origin server (/inde

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache Server Problem

2006-12-14 Thread Andy Rush
Hi, I'm new to this forum so please bear with me We're running Apache 2.0.52 on an IBM iSeries 520On this platform we run a real time web site providing live stock access to customers. The site has been running fine for well over 3 years (programs haven't changed), however recent system softwar

[users@httpd] Frequently updating static content

2016-01-20 Thread David Rush
I'm using Apache 2.4 (on Linux) to serve some static files that are re-created and re-written every two minutes. The nature of our site is that we get hammered with high request rates from time to time (thousands of requests per minute at times). Are there any issues with frequently updating a fi

Re: [users@httpd] Frequently updating static content

2016-01-21 Thread David Rush
Thanks for the input. I'll give that a go. David On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Luca Toscano wrote: > > > 2016-01-21 1:55 GMT+01:00 Yann Ylavic : > >> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:36 PM, David Rush wrote: >> >> > What happens if it's updated

[users@httpd] VirtualHost and HTTPS

2018-08-29 Thread David Rush
I'm running httpd 2.4.12 on Windows Server 2003. We have things set up and working with http and https using the primary host name (fully qualified). We need for a different domain (same hostname) to work with https. These both need to work: https://myhost.domain1.org - this works fine https:/

Re: [users@httpd] VirtualHost and HTTPS

2018-08-29 Thread David Rush
, Jonathan Sélea wrote: > I am very sure that this has to do with the fact that older machines > simply does not have support for SNI. > > > On 2018-08-29 16:28, David Rush wrote: > >> I'm running httpd 2.4.12 on Windows Server 2003. >> >> We have things set up

Re: [users@httpd] VirtualHost and HTTPS

2018-08-30 Thread David Rush
ug 29, 2018 at 8:54 PM, Jonathan Sélea wrote: > >> It is. >> If you try to disable myhost.domain1.org - you will see that >> myhost.domain2.org will work over SSL/TLS :) >> >> >> >> >> On 2018-08-29 19:19, David Rush wrote: >> >>> Ah,