Hi,
After some years out of the Apache discussion, I'm back for a quite specific
question... ;-)
We have been running Apache HTTP Server 2.0 for some years now. Everything
works fine as expected but I think we encounter something that can only be a
bug.
We are using _name based virtual hosts_
rtual host bug after
> Apache restart
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Chirouze Olivier
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > After some years out of the Apache discussion, I'm back for
> a quite specific
> > question... ;-)
> >
> > We have been runnin
Of course, I should have guessed about the command just statically parsing
files. However, at least I'd have a live proof that it's a bug if I run the
command while the server behaves strange :-)
Sorry, what do you mean about duplicate? Would you mean:
ServerName nameB1.org
ServerAlias nameB1.
Hi,
This will seem like an obsession for me, but I have more questions about
the status page.
I'm running Apache 2.0.58 on Solaris 5.9, as a reverse proxy. [ This
last point is probably key ]
I thought the "..reading.." state meant "I'm reading client request http
headers".
It seems it's not, or a
;s why I think if I can
manage to fix this, the modules will work (and I won't be fired ;-)
Thanks in advance,
Olivier
Olivier CHIROUZE
I&0 Infrastructure
Volvo Information Technology
> -Original Message-
> From: Chirouze Olivier
> Sent: 06 February 2007 10:2
Hi
This is the following of an existing thread I originaly posted, but I
have more details. I will describe the problem more precisely, hopping
this time, someone will give some help ;-)
Let say you have a very complicated page (or just a buggy app :-)
published on an app server (on local network
l behaviour of "handlers" (one
and then the other, then the next one...).
But I keep thinking something's wrong...
Or is it possible to change the order of handlers??
Olivier
> -----Original Message-
> From: Chirouze Olivier
> Sent: 07 February 2007 16:07
> To:
che.org
> Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status page: reading state
>
> Georgi Chorbadzhiyski wrote:
> > Chirouze Olivier wrote:
> >> I'm adding information to my own message... Hope someone
> will hear me!
> >>
> >> I spent the day trying to test how
Hi,
I'm trying to use mod_cband... but can't manage to!
I've tailed down my conf file to the most simple case with just one
virtual host.
What I'm trying to achieve is quite simple: I just want to limit the
number of concurrent connections per virtual host (a "MaxClient" at the
virtualhost level)
Hi,
First, I supppose that's just a cut/paste mistake, but with
RewriteEngine set to Off, not much will happen.
Second, you might want to play with [P] flag to proxy the request.
Anyway, your last rule is strange: you might try:
RewriteRule .* http://www.theanotherpage.com [P]
Olivier CHIRO
Hi,
I think you should manage to do this by using RewriteCond directive and
REQUEST_METHOD environment variable
(http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_rewrite.html#rewritecond). You
should be able to build a test that says "if http method is TRACE,
then... Then forbid"
Next line should then be
Hi,
I try to run Apache.exe to go to the internet but I get an error with winzip -
what is the URL please?
Ok, just kidding :-)
I'd like to know if there is a way to change the order in which modules are
called by Apache (either by conf or by source code change...)
Here's my pb: I have a modul
How to remove someone from the mailing list please with apache. Give
good answer. The error is ['imthiaz'].
Olivier
Olivier CHIROUZE
I&0 Infrastructure
Volvo Information Technology
> -Original Message-
> From: Krist van Besien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 16 February 2007 11:21
>
Hi,
I already had this but can't manage to find back the solution.
I have two clues, thought:
- you should have ProxyRequests Off to both of your virtualhosts (or at
least, the first one).
- I guess you did, but just in case, did you load module
"proxy_http_module"?
Last thing, I've recently fo
Hi,
You probably have more than these messages to provide: the error log you
are showing is just Firefox or IE trying to get favicon file. This is
common, nothing to worry about.
You should upgrade log level, and have another look at both error log
and access log...
Olivier
Olivier CHIROUZE
> Regards,
> Peter
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chirouze Olivier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 3:15 PM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache error
>
> Hi,
>
> You probably have more than t
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Joshua Slive
> Sent: 15 February 2007 16:07
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Modules order
>
> On 2/15/07, Chirouze Olivier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'd like to know if there is a
before they are forwarded to the webserver by mod proxy.
I'm happy.
Olivier
PS: I will try to contact mod_vhost_limit creator to share the hacking.
Open source rules ;-)
Olivier CHIROUZE
I&0 Infrastructure
Volvo Information Technology
> -Original Message-
> From: Chirou
Also, you'll need to put the LoadModule mod_vhost_limit directive BEFORE
YOUR VIRTUALHOSTS...
Olivier CHIROUZE
I&0 Infrastructure
Volvo Information Technology
> -Original Message-----
> From: Chirouze Olivier
> Sent: 16 February 2007 16:03
> To: 'users@httpd
Hi,
Have a look at this module: http://cband.linux.pl/
Olivier
Olivier CHIROUZE
I&0 Infrastructure
Volvo Information Technology
> -Original Message-
> From: uxwrstre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 February 2007 10:12
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lim
Well, P flag should be enough, but make sure the site you are
redirecting to (the intranet web server) doesn't do a HTTP redirect. If
it does (and if it doesn't, that's safer anyway), you must use
ProxyPassReverse.
Also, make sure you don't use "R" flag! But I guess it's not permitted
to use it al
This will work. But NameVirtualHost directive is useless as it will not
work as expected.
Just remove NameVirtualHost *:443
Olivier
Olivier CHIROUZE
I&0 Infrastructure
Volvo Information Technology
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 26 Febr
Hi,
I would like to say this different:
Indeed, there is no way to use NAME BASED virtual hosts on the same IP /
Port with different SSL certificates.
However, it is possible to use IP PASED virtual hosts with different SSL
certificates => they will have to be on different Ips or different
ports.
Have you had a look at "AllowConnect"?
Olivier CHIROUZE
I&0 Infrastructure
Volvo Information Technology
From: Sai Jai Ganesh Gurubaran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 February 2007 07:34
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subje
Hi,
My contribution might not be very valuable, but we do have these errors
sometimes as well.
I think it might just be what the error log is telling us: a network
error between your reverse proxy and the web server?
I hapen to have a look at this too (there is another bug report...)
http://three
Hi,
I'm sorry I always insist on wildcard certificates being not officialy
supported by Apache, but I think that's something to know about. You can
save a bunch of dollars a year with this trick ;-)
Here's what I recently wrote for a doc, feel free to correct me if I'm
wrong:
---
Hi Jean-Philippe,
Took me time to answer as well...
It becomes pretty weird if this is working on another machine.
If your browser queries for cookies this is not because of Apache but
related to your web application.
Do you use mod_usertrack?
Can you provide a full log? If it logs 20 attempts it
e servers and browsers and
> make their use
> a standard practice.
>
> Just my $0.02,
>Issac
>
>
> Chirouze Olivier wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm sorry I always insist on wildcard certificates being
> not officialy
> > supported by Apache
Thanks to Georgi Chorbadzhiyski [EMAIL PROTECTED] for pointing me to this
amazing "feature" of Apache.
Try the status page with the undocumented "?notable" at the end.
(http://myserver/status?notable)
Also, have a look at the long thread I once started on this list called
Apache 2.0.58 + Solaris 5
Is
2.2.4 at the same level of patches as 2.0.57?
Olivier
Olivier CHIROUZE
I&0 Infrastructure
Volvo Information Technology
> -Original Message-
> From: Reif Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 28 March 2007 16:01
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECT
; Subject: AW: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ..reading.. in mod_status
>
> > From: Chirouze Olivier *EXTERN* [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > "Notable" does bring much more information for me. I even had
> > a look at
> > the code, and it's as simple as tha
I suggest mod_vhost_limit, pretty simple but doing what you're asking
for.
http://www.ivn.cl/apache/ and http://www.linuxtechs.net/mod_vhost
(not only because I did work on it recently ;-)
Olivier
Olivier CHIROUZE
I&0 Infrastructure
Volvo Information Technology
_
Hi Mark,
I suggest you have a look at Splunk (http://www.splunk.com/products/218)
which will definitively do things you don't need, but probably do what
you need, too ;-)
I ended up creating an Excel macro to just play with logs, too. I can
even provide it to you if you want!
Olivier
Olivier CHI
Hi,
You need to use $1 instead of $0. I didn't know what $0 meant but now I guess
it's "current rewriten URL"...
Anyway, "$something" starts at 1.
Olivier
Olivier CHIROUZE
I&0 Infrastructure
Volvo Information Technology
> -Original Message-
> From: Емил Иванов / Emil Ivanov [mailto:[
Hi,
What exactly do you mean by "keeps seeing"? Did you try to play with the URI
(logs, RewriteCond, etc) to make absolutely sure that it's the INPUT URI that
is decoded, or could it be the "output" URI (the rewriten one) that is decoded?
Olivier
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PRO
Hi all,
I'm using Apache http Server 2.0 as a reverse proxy with a lot of
name-based virtual hosts listening on a few IP adresses.
The thing is, it's always the primary IP address of the server that is
used when requests are forwarded (by the proxy module) to applicaton
servers.
That means whateve
Hi,
This is my first contribution to the list so please don't be too rude if
I'm wrong ;-)
But I think we have the same situation here:
Onename.server.com/
Othername.server.com
Somethingelse.server.com
And our SSL certificate is for *.server.com
** WE ** did provide this certificate from ** ou
Did you try adding \ before the % char?
Olivier
Olivier CHIROUZE
I&0 Infrastructure
Volvo Information Technology
-Original Message-
From: Octavian Rasnita [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 January 2007 16:38
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] special chars in URLS
Hi all,
I'm facing a quite tricky situation with Apache 2.0.58 running on
Solaris 5.9.
Apache is running as a reverse proxy (mod_proxy + mod_rewrite).
The maximum concurrent connections is set to 150.
Because we reached the maximum a few times and got the reverse proxy
saturated, we started moni
and/or configuration issue.
What other plugins are you running? Also, is this HTTP proxying, or
HTTPS?
----- Original Message
From: Chirouze Olivier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 9:56:46 AM
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.58 + Solar
rom: Jean-Yves Avenard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 January 2007 23:41
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SSL Certificate on Intranet Virtual Host
Hi
On 1/26/07, Chirouze Olivier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is my first contribution to th
Hi Sander,
Thanks for your very precise comments. Below are mine...
> Chirouze,
My actual firstname is Olivier :-)
>
> On Jan 26, 2007, at 8:41 AM, Chirouze Olivier wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your prompt reply. We will definitively upgrade
> soon, just
> > "
I think this simplification is true, but only if Tony doesn't have a
kind of "garbage collector" "forbidden" last rule.
I'm using similar config, but the last rule is always
RewriteRule "*" ... Forbidden ([F])
... Which makes it mandatory to list all the "/webx" rules before...
Or maybe somethin
I'm not exactly sure RewriteRule accepts all sorts of regex, such as
"?".
But if so, I guess the following should do:
RewriteRule ^/projects/design/(.?) http://www.mydoma.in/~michael/$1 [P]
And below:
RewriteRule ^/projects/design/ - [F]
Or even:
RewriteRule .* - [F]
That would make a call
-Original Message-
> From: John P. Dodge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 30 January 2007 21:24
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.58 + Solaris 5.9:
> status "...reading..." & TCP state "FIN_WAIT_2"
>
&
Hi,
I was wondering: do any of you know about a better status page than the
one provided by mod_status on http://myserver/status? I feel like the
"machine readable" (http://myserver/status?auto) is just the same thing
with less information ;-)
I haven't manage to find modules for this. However sta
t: 31 January 2007 17:10
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.58 + Solaris 5.9:
> status "...reading..." & TCP state "FIN_WAIT_2"
>
> On 1/31/07, Chirouze Olivier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi John,
> >
This is probably more than "slightly" off topic.
You might want to check your html syntax (validator.w3c.org), and use
something like
if (parent.navigate.document) {
// Seems like it's necessary for IE
parent.navigate.document.location = url;
} else {
// Usual way
parent.navigate.src =
Hmm... mod_rewrite only rewrites the URL... It doens't change the
content.
I guess you use the dynamically generated listing?
So you should probably play with the directive that allows you to list
directories. I don't remember which one it is and don't use it myself.
But I guess you can play with i
Hi,
I guess you should add [L] ("last") to your first rule, and make sure
the second one is AFTER. Thus, the first rule will work for *.html, and
exit. When calling *.php, it will go to the second one...
RewriteEngine on
RewriteRule ^([0-9a-zA-Z]+)\.html$ $1.php [L]
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI}
I guess nothing is supposed to work on some platform and not on others
(Windows, Unix...).
Did you try upgrading RewriteLogLevel to 3? You should get more
information on what's happening.
Another note: Kriss is right, if you want to redirect anything to your
php files, remember to never print th
I'm not sure I get you, but it sounds like you just don't want to have
the *:443 virtual host existing at all!! I think as soon as the apache
processing starts on your virtual host, the SSL handshake has been done
(=> the warning appeared). So whatever you will put in the
scope will be handled _af
52 matches
Mail list logo
