Actually "Expires" and "Cache-Control" do work properly. Don't you see those
headers in the response received by your browser? Are the elements cached by
your browser?
I believe that the behaviour you observe may be due to the order in which
mod_header and mod_cache process the response. My gu
server-status keeps track of the status of the last request that was
served in each slot. SS > 65000 means that at least 65000 seconds have
elapsed since the last request served in that particular slot began. There is
absolutely nothing wrong with that.
-ascs
From: Frederick, Fabian
[mai
Lennart,
I believe it would be very hard to achieve what you describe. Maybe that's why
nobody replied.
The thing is that you could create different virtual hosts for example[1-n] all
using the same document root, but you would need to rewrite the path to prepend
it with /example[i] only for r
After having checked the CHANGES_2.0 file, it seems like
ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain has not made it into the 2.0.55 distribution. If
you need that functionality you should therefore apply the patch attached to
Bugzilla BR 10722 (patch 11915) and recompile the appropriate modules.
The order o
I think you may have missed something.
If the two tests were identical, the total number of bytes transferred should
have been the same. In the first case you transfer 2.6 MB, in the second 9 MB.
No wonder the first test executes faster...
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: JM [mailto:[EMA
age d'origine-
De : Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : mardi 13 décembre 2005 14:29
À : users@httpd.apache.org
Objet : RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain
After having checked the CHANGES_2.0 file, it seems like
ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain has n
That's more or less what it usually should be.
You need to verify who issues the HTTP 302: the authentication module or the
application?
A trace from LiveHTTPHeaders would really be useful, because we do not have
much to work on here...
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Frederick, Fabian
I believe your ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain is the reverse of what it should be
You should have something like
ProxyPass /blah http://privateserver/
ProxyPassReverse /blah http://privateserver/
ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain .public.domain .private.domain
Forget about ProxyPassReverseCookiePath.
What about emacs ??
mvh
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Harald Falkenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 10:04 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] text browser with javascript on linux/solaris
Hallo,
I'm looking for a text browser (like l
I believe Apache expects PEM encoded X509 certificates. Certificates can be all
grouped into one file, or separated into individual files based on whether you
use the CertificatePath or CertificateFile directives. Refer to the Apache
manual pages for the details.
The PKCS#7 encoded certificate
short while ago and
posted it on the list.
BTW: In the future, please reply directly to the list rather than to my
personal address.
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Frederick, Fabian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 9:43 AM
To: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Subject
Changed name of subject back to the original one.
-Original Message-
From: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 2:16 PM
To: Frederick, Fabian
Cc: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: [apache] Session release problem
It looks like you end up in a
Robert,
AFAIK the %{SERVER_NAME} variable is only available to mod_rewrite so what you
suggest is not doable.
So you can either follow the User's guide and add %v (the name of the virtual
host) to each log entry in your access log at the server level, and then split
that one log file into one
Could it possibly be because ProxyPass is evaluated before RewriteRule ?
How does the following work :
RewriteEngine on
RewriteRule /pub/wiv/(.*).asx$ ajp://theTomcatBox:8009/pub/wiv?seoName=$1
[P,QSA]
RewriteRule /pub ajp://theTomcatBox:8009/pub [P]
ProxyPassReverse /pub ajp://theTomcatBox:8009
The only way to resolve this problem is to transform your ProxyPass rules into
RewriteRule rules.
I can see no reason why upgrading from Solaris 8 to Solaris 10 should change
anything wrt the order in which the modules are executed. This is something
that Apache determines itself based on the w
more suggestions and/or workarounds!
Thanks, pete
Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV wrote:
>Could it possibly be because ProxyPass is evaluated before RewriteRule ?
>
>How does the following work :
>
>RewriteEngine on
>RewriteRule /pub/wiv/(.*).asx$
>ajp://theTomcatBox:8009/pub/wiv?seoNa
Two
things you can do:
1. If
you are not using the load-balancing or fail-over functionalities provided by
mod_weblogic, yank the whole module out and use ProxyPass
instead.
2.
Contact BEA support.
-ascs
From: sujoy pramanick
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 200
The reason why you probably did not get any replies to your previous postings
on this subject is that you do not provide any useful information about the
problem you are experiencing apart from "I have a rev proxy problem", "it used
to work", "Page cannot be displayed" which says nothing about y
The same server certificate is presented by both sites and the CN does not
match any of the FQDN. Therefore you get a security warning on both URLs.
That's what's wrong.
The requests will always be served by the first (default) NVH which IP
address/port matches the VirtualHost definition regard
In your conf below, you use the same certificate in both VH although the
ServerName are different.
All requests will be handled by the grundfunk VH regardless of whether you
request grundfunk.de or ronalter.de.
If you add
CustomLog /etc/apache2/log/grundfunk_access_log combined
to the grund
the VHs, you will always get a security warning no matter what.
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 5:45 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] More than one name-based vhost with SSL
In your conf below, you use
How can I possibly have lived for so long without knowing about that web site?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 5:37 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] More than one name-based vhost with SSL
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] More than one name-based vhost with SSL
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV wrote:
> In your case you have the same certificate specified in both VHs, but
> since that certificate does not match the ServerName n
: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] More than one name-based vhost with SSL
Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV wrote:
> In your conf below, you use the same certificate in both VH although the
> ServerName are different.
>
>All requests will be handled by the grundfunk VH r
ProxyPass / http://www.yahoomail.com/
will pass all requests to www.yahoomail.com
You may also want to add
ProxyPassReverse / http://www.yahoomail.com/
-ascs
From: senthil kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 6:54 AM
To: users@http
Try
Header set User-Agent foobar
You will need mod_headers.
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Zlotorzynski, Piotr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 9:57 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to change User-Agent in apache 1.3 runnin as a
pr
of HTTP response headers.
So it works only for setting response headers of a web server, as I understand.
pz
-Original Message-
From: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 10:05 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How
he.org
>Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewrite gurus help? (with mod_proxy_ajp)
>
>Yes I am using 2.2, for the advantages mod_proxy_ajp was supposed to have over
>mod_jk. Now I am rethinking that decision...
>
>I will use the logging for more insight, thanks for that tip as we
Generally speaking this will cause no problem unless the backend server issues
a HTTP 302 (or other redirection) with a Location header that needs the reverse
transformation.
I do not know if that could ever happen in the case of AJP, but imagine the
Tomcat issues a redirect to ajp://theTomcatB
I am not sure I understood all of that, but...
When it comes to the yahoomail stuff, the reason you get redirected to
www.yahoomail.com is that you are missing the ProxyPassReverse directive.
ProxyPassReverse / http://www.yahoomail.com/
However, I am not quite sure that what you actually wan
It seems obvious that there is no file
/Users/sdavis/Documents/workspace/DogDB/lib/Dog/HTML/DogForm.pm
But on the other hand it could be too obvious to be true.
Otherwise I thought it was necessary to set "Options ExecCGI"...
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Sean Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PR
You need to look into the cookie domain and cookie path of the session cookies
returned to the browser. It may be that these values are such that the browser
does not send the cookie with the following request.
To look at these values, use LiveHTTPHeaders or HTTPWatch (Firefox and IE
resp.) to
Reverse the order of the two Location sections.
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Azwan Adli Abdullah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 9:14 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Override SSLVerifyClient
Hi All,
I have 1 question regarding howto o
There are several parameters that determine the maximum number of connections.
Only one of them is an Apache parameter: MaxClients.
In addition to this, there are system limits that restrict the number of
connections a single process may accept. If you use the worker MPM of Apache
2.x, the ma
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 6:11 PM
To: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Cc: users@httpd.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Override SSLVerifyClient
Hi,
Tried that but also doesn't work. Any other clue?
Rgds,
Azwan
> Reverse the order of the two
After re-reading the original post, I observe the mention of "from a single
client".
There is nothing that limits the number of connections from any particular
client.
-ascs
-Original Message-----
From: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 11:09 AM
Stupid question: Did you restart you Apache server following your modification
??
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Jain, Abhay K, ALABS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 8:00 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to disable public_html
The mod_expires that you activate with "ExpiresActive On" will add an Expires
header to the responses sent to the client. It does nothing for Apache cache
expiration. It does however have an effect on the expiration of downstream
caches, in your case probably on the User Agent cache.
For cache
what you are trying to tell me, I should add the "expiresactive
on" directive on the source server instead of the caching server?
Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
12/01/2006 15:12
Please respond to
u
The
easiest way to get an answer for such questions is to consult the Apache manual,
in your case http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_rewrite.html#rewriterule
-ascs
From: senthil kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 10:32 AMTo:
users@httpd.apache.orgSubject
It actually seems like the size of the contents is increased by mod_deflate...
but yes, it is definitely processed by mod_deflate. The reason why the
compressed content is bigger than the input probably is that the amount of data
is so small.
Regarding the compression level, be aware that you m
I will assume that you are using Apache 2.0 or newer. In that case, in addition
to mod_proxy, you need to include the mod_proxy_http module.
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 1:41 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subj
/
You should now get some pretty detailed logs about what is happening.
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 2:10 PM
To: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Cc: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ProxyPass does not
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 2:27 PM
To: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Cc: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ProxyPass does not work with
hostnamesonlyIP's.(mod_proxyApache 1.3)
Does that rewrite rule do exactly the same as ProxyPass? Anyway, same
I think Joshua's advice was pretty sound. Somebody on an OpenBSD list may have
run into this problem previously, and he was certainly right about the chroot
stuff...
Before closing the subject you could look into the /var/www/etc directory and
see if you find a resolv.conf file, and if not you
Your non-SSL virtual host logs to access_log using the "combined" log format
which AWStats parses correctly.
Your SSL virtual host logs to access_log using the "common" format (by default).
Since the "combined" format is parsed correctly, I suggest that you replace the
TransferLog directive in
That's exactly what I was suggesting.
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Mark McCulligh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 4:08 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SSL Logs and AWStats
Joshua Slive wrote:
>On 1/18/06, Mark McCulligh <[EMA
I never managed to make AddOutputFilterByType work properly for DEFLATE. There
is a Bugzilla report that basically says that it does not work and is beyond
salvation.
You should try using mod_filter; that's what I ended up doing. Although
mod_filter is an Apache 2.2 module, it is perfectly comp
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AddOutputFilterByType MIME wildcards?
On 1/20/06, Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> I never managed
to make AddOutputFilterByType work properly for DEFLATE. There is a Bugzilla
report that basically says that it does not work and is beyond
Since when did libexpat become a module??
The symbol XmlInitUnknownEncoding is defined in
srclib/apr-util/xml/expat/lib/xmltok.c which is part of libexpat. So its plain
impossible for XmlInitUnknownEncoding not to be defined.
Have you tried to do an "ldd -v libexpat.so.0" to see if there is any
Have you searched http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla ??
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37145
-ascs
From: Mark Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 8:16 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Large
Annie,
You do not specify what version of Apache you are using.
My understanding is that there is a content server somewhere that also hosts
cgi-scripts, and you have put a reverse proxy in front of that server. You do
NOT want CGI scripts to be executed on the reverse proxy.
Have you tested
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/developer/ is a good starting point.
There is also something called "The Apache Modeling Project" that has written a
pretty nice document about the Apache server design.
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William
S
Forgot the link: http://f-m-c.org/projects/apache/index.php
-Original Message-
From: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 8:54 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] External Modules
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/developer/ is a good
Allow from all
where /usr/lib/cgi-bin/ is the absolute path to cgi folder on 10.10.10.10
It doesn't work either,and perhaps was it a nut thing to do.
So if you have an idea ...
Thanks for help.
cordialement. annie
Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV a écrit :
Annie,
You do n
What do you mean by "instances"??
Do you mean that there are 5 httpd processes?
Could you list the output of "httpd -l" and the value of your StartServers
configuration parameter?
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 20
iple httpd instances on startup? (OS X)
---- "Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do you mean by "instances"??
>
> Do you mean that there are 5 httpd processes?
>
> Could you list the output of "httpd -l" and the value of
ED] How to execute cgi on a proxied host ?
Hi Axel-Stéphane,
AddModule mod_proxy was after AddModule mod_cgi. I try to change the
ordering : no effect :-(
Regards, annie
Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV a écrit :
>In Apache 1.3 the order in which the modules are executed depends on the order
>i
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 2:20 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to execute cgi on a proxied host ?
Le 26 janv. 06 à 17:00, Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV a écrit :
> Could you provide me with your list of AddModule directives as w
Hey guys, wake up!
Where do you think Mohan got the HTTP 404 from???
There are two possibilities:
1. It was the apache httpd server that actually served the HTTP 404 in which
case Mohan did not put the file in the right place. Check the DocumentRoot and
make sure the file is in that directory
2
Some web server replied with a HTTP 404, whether apache or another. What you
need to find out is whether it was Apache that replied.
Supposing your ServerRoot is d:/apache2 and your ErrorLog is logs/error.log,
please post the relevant parts of the file d:\apache2\logs\error.log
If Apache is ac
Open an Internet explorer on your apache server host.
Go to File > Open
Paste D:\Apache2\htdocs\status.html into the field and press Return.
What happens then?
-ascs
From: mohan devanoor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 9:59 AM
To: u
I guess that you had Apache 1.3 directives in your httpd.conf that do no longer
exist in Apache 2.0. Chances are that your server was not even running. Also,
whenever you require assistance, be more specific in your problem description.
"It doesn't work" just doesn't do it...
Rule #1 when debu
I thought you were supposed to use slashes "/" rather than back-slashes"\" in
httpd.conf, even on Windows servers.
What about replacing "D:\Apache2\htdocs\sample" with "D:/Apache2/htdocs/sample"
??
-ascs
From: mohan devanoor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
The error log says that the file Apache is trying to read is
/radar/data/hi3.html. The error log normally will report the absolute file
system path contrary to the access log that reports the URL path requested. At
the same time, from the information given, it is my understanding that the URL
Do you have both proxymatch blocks in the same configuration ??
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Sebastian Reitenbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 10:41 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] only allowing specific hosts via https proxy
H
What do the access and error log files say?
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: myles dolan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 12:51 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Not seeing helloworld.html in /var/www/htdocs
Good Morning
I have a basic
The thing is that the URL requested by the CONNECT method is not prefixed with
http://. Therefore, will never match anything unless the
host name is https.
The following wil disallow access to http://www.forbidden.com/ (which
translates into "GET http://www.forbidden.com/";) but allow anything
The rewrite condition is superfluous, and furthermore it is not because the
connection is on port 443 that it is necessarily SSL. Either you have
"SSLEngine On" within that virtual host, or you don't: that's what determines
whether the VH uses SSL or not.
A better way of testing is to use the %
I have not used mod_proxy_html extensively, and it has been a while now, but
from the understanding I have it will do textual substitution of links in a
HTML document with another string. Therefore nothing prevents you from using a
pattern that will match any part of the link URL, including the
There was recently a thread on this subject on this list. The solution
consisted of using a module that fiddles with the X-Forwarded-For header.
The exact name of the thread was "[EMAIL PROTECTED] reverse proxy - forward ip"
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Mr Alex Eydelberg [mailto:[EMAI
What about this:
RewriteEngine ON
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} =virtualhost
RewriteRule .* - [F]
or alternatively
RewriteEngine ON
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !=sslservername
RewriteRule .* - [F]
Instead or returning a HTTP 403 you could redirect the request to the
apropriate URL:
RewriteEngine ON
I am surprised to learn that the default value for MaxClients on a Debian
install is as low as 20.
The value of MaxClients depends on a number of factors including the number of
requests per second and the time required to serve each request. The longer it
takes to serve a request, the longer a
All I see here is a document actually being saved to cache. It does not show
the cache modules declining the request because the document is not in cache. I
can therefore only assume that the document was NOT in cache when the request
was issued.
There are request headers that will prevent a do
Don't know about mod_jk, but if you are not using any particular functionality
of the module other than tranferring the request to a backend server, you might
just as well use reverse proxying.
I would think something like this would work:
Listen *:80
RewriteEngine On
UseCanonicalName Off
Proxy
The order in which the modules are loaded is not significant from version 2.0
on. It is the module developer who determines when the different hooks should
be executed, and whether some other modules should be executed before or after.
This happens during hook registration. If you take a look at
If memory serve me right, all mod_proxy hooks execute before mod_rewrite in
Apache 2.0. Module ordering is irrelevant.
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Joost de Heer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 10:23 AM
To: David Hull
Cc: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EM
ary 21, 2006 4:53 PM
To: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: RewriteRule being ignored
Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV wrote:
> If memory serve me right, all mod_proxy hooks execute before
> mod_rewrite in Apache 2.0. Module or
You need to get the core file and load it into a debugger in order to try to
figure out where the signal is raised. How to get the core file depends on your
OS. On Solaris you need to enable core dumps using coreadm. I believe that by
default the core file should be generated in the apache root
If you want your clients to access OWA through HTTPS you need to add the
directives you mention below to you SSL-enabled virtual host (probably to what
you refer as ssl.conf).
You should have a section starting with or similar
somewhere in your configuration. That section contains "SSLEngine O
ServerName www.public.foobar.com
ProxyPass /foobar http://www.internal.foobar.com/
ProxyPassReverse /foobar http://www.internal.foobar.com/
ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain .internal.foobar.com .public.foobar.com
ProxyPassReverseCookiePath / /foobar
What you should do is look at what cookies are
The problem is that the response contains no cache validator: no Last-Modified,
no E-Tag. If it contains no cache validator, it must contain an explicit
expiry date in order to be cacheable. Look at sections 13.3 and 13.4 of RFC
2616.
Your problem is typical of files generated by a servlet, or
There is an example here:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_proxy.html#proxypassreverse
-Original Message-
From: Nick Kew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 5:38 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Looking for some examples of how t
ave little control over the output from the
CGI program, but maybe mod_expires or mod_headers can add the header before
mod_cache evaluates the response?
Kind regards,
Frans Knibbe
Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV wrote:
> The problem is that the response contains no cache validator: no
> Last-Mo
Nick, I really did not get this.
To me it is clear that using a front-end web server for serving static contents
and proxying other requests to a back-end application server, whether being
Tomcat, Sun, BEA, IBM or other, offloads the application server and improves
overall performance of an (J2
The surest way to get that list is to ask the OS. On Solaris, use "pldd `cat
/httpd.pid`". I'm sure there are similar tools on other
Unices.
-ascs
From: Thomas Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2006 6:31 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.or
Could sound like there is a problem with the added module.
Does Apache start when you remove those two lines you added ?
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Kaushal Shriyan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 8:16 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] $
For any module you remove, you must also remove the associated configuration
directives. The configuration is parsed by each module, so if you remove for
example mod_ssl, you must remove all directives defined in mod_ssl such as
SSLEngine, from your configuration file(s). If you remove mod_mime,
If that were the case, I do not think the apachectl execution would even have
gotten as far as line 99. Furthermore I hardly think "Illegal instruction" is a
shell script error. It may however very well be an error issued by the
VlApache20_32 module.
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Boyl
Nope. It's 150 simultaneous TCP connections.
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Luiz Eduardo Gualti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 2:01 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] concurrent connections (httpd.conf) X PHP sessions
are the same thing ?
e Grüsse (?)
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Boyle Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 4:04 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] $HTTPD -k $ARGV
> -Original Message-
> From: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent
The fact that the run-time linker tries to look for the C library in the
/sybase directory only means that /sybase is in the search path.
On Solaris there are several ways of defining the search path for dynamic
linking. First of all there is a system default. Then a search path can be
added to
Wouldn't the problem rather be that Location should be replaced by
LocationMatch ??
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Boyle Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 2:31 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Location question
> -Original Mes
Makes me a little curious because I have never seen any browser make a Range
request. I wonder what prompted the browser to make a Range request rather than
just request the whole document.
Could be worthwhile to ask the client to flush the browser cache...
-ascs
-Original Message-
Fro
>From the top of my head you also need to be root in order to do setuid/setgid
>to change the process owner according to the User and Group configuration
>directives.
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: David Salisbury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 7:08 PM
To: us
What about something like this?
RewriteEngine On
RewriteLog logs/rewrite_log
RewriteLogLevel 9
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^(webmail\.[^:]+)
RewriteRule .* http://%1:7080/webmail.exe [R]
-ascs
<
-Original Message-
From: m i l e s [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday,
A HTTP response is cacheable if it contains a cache validator (ETag,
Last-Modified) or an Expires header (or both), provided neither the response or
the request that elicited it contain a Cache-Control header explicitely
forbidding caching. If the response is cached, it must contain one of the a
Apache does not know about sessions. HTTP is stateless. If you are running PHP,
it's a PHP problem.
-ascs
From: Durga Prasad (duprasad) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 9:52 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sessio
handled by apache.
Thanks,
Durga
-Original Message-
From: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 1:29 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Session handling when Time is changed on the
machine where apache http server is running
ot; twice after the last line)
Does the server respond?
Why would you need to change the time of the server ?
-ascs
-Original Message-----
From: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 10:33 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Session handling when Tim
1 - 100 of 407 matches
Mail list logo