RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Expires" and "Cache-Control" don't work properly

2005-05-09 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Actually "Expires" and "Cache-Control" do work properly. Don't you see those headers in the response received by your browser? Are the elements cached by your browser? I believe that the behaviour you observe may be due to the order in which mod_header and mod_cache process the response. My gu

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SS>65000 !

2005-12-13 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
server-status keeps track of the status of the last request that was served in each slot. SS > 65000 means that at least 65000 seconds have elapsed since the last request served in that particular slot began. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that.   -ascs From: Frederick, Fabian [mai

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Only redirecting, but not changing the root?

2005-12-13 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Lennart, I believe it would be very hard to achieve what you describe. Maybe that's why nobody replied. The thing is that you could create different virtual hosts for example[1-n] all using the same document root, but you would need to rewrite the path to prepend it with /example[i] only for r

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain

2005-12-13 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
After having checked the CHANGES_2.0 file, it seems like ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain has not made it into the 2.0.55 distribution. If you need that functionality you should therefore apply the patch attached to Bugzilla BR 10722 (patch 11915) and recompile the appropriate modules. The order o

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_backhand on load balancing apache

2005-12-15 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
I think you may have missed something. If the two tests were identical, the total number of bytes transferred should have been the same. In the first case you transfer 2.6 MB, in the second 9 MB. No wonder the first test executes faster... -ascs -Original Message- From: JM [mailto:[EMA

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain

2005-12-16 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
age d'origine- De : Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : mardi 13 décembre 2005 14:29 À : users@httpd.apache.org Objet : RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain After having checked the CHANGES_2.0 file, it seems like ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain has n

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain

2005-12-16 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
That's more or less what it usually should be. You need to verify who issues the HTTP 302: the authentication module or the application? A trace from LiveHTTPHeaders would really be useful, because we do not have much to work on here... -ascs -Original Message- From: Frederick, Fabian

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain

2005-12-16 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
I believe your ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain is the reverse of what it should be You should have something like ProxyPass /blah http://privateserver/ ProxyPassReverse /blah http://privateserver/ ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain .public.domain .private.domain Forget about ProxyPassReverseCookiePath.

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] text browser with javascript on linux/solaris

2005-12-21 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
What about emacs ?? mvh -ascs -Original Message- From: Harald Falkenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 10:04 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] text browser with javascript on linux/solaris Hallo, I'm looking for a text browser (like l

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Certificate Import into Apache 2.2.0

2005-12-21 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
I believe Apache expects PEM encoded X509 certificates. Certificates can be all grouped into one file, or separated into individual files based on whether you use the CertificatePath or CertificateFile directives. Refer to the Apache manual pages for the details. The PKCS#7 encoded certificate

[EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: [apache] Session release problem

2005-12-21 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
short while ago and posted it on the list. BTW: In the future, please reply directly to the list rather than to my personal address. -ascs -Original Message- From: Frederick, Fabian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 9:43 AM To: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV Subject

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain

2005-12-21 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Changed name of subject back to the original one. -Original Message- From: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 2:16 PM To: Frederick, Fabian Cc: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: [apache] Session release problem It looks like you end up in a

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] how can I add SERVER_NAME to a filename

2006-01-03 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Robert, AFAIK the %{SERVER_NAME} variable is only available to mod_rewrite so what you suggest is not doable. So you can either follow the User's guide and add %v (the name of the virtual host) to each log entry in your access log at the server level, and then split that one log file into one

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewrite gurus help? (with mod_proxy_ajp)

2006-01-03 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Could it possibly be because ProxyPass is evaluated before RewriteRule ? How does the following work : RewriteEngine on RewriteRule /pub/wiv/(.*).asx$ ajp://theTomcatBox:8009/pub/wiv?seoName=$1 [P,QSA] RewriteRule /pub ajp://theTomcatBox:8009/pub [P] ProxyPassReverse /pub ajp://theTomcatBox:8009

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod_proxy definitions taking precedence over mod-rewrite rules (Again)

2006-01-03 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
The only way to resolve this problem is to transform your ProxyPass rules into RewriteRule rules. I can see no reason why upgrading from Solaris 8 to Solaris 10 should change anything wrt the order in which the modules are executed. This is something that Apache determines itself based on the w

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewrite gurus help? (with mod_proxy_ajp)

2006-01-03 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
more suggestions and/or workarounds! Thanks, pete Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV wrote: >Could it possibly be because ProxyPass is evaluated before RewriteRule ? > >How does the following work : > >RewriteEngine on >RewriteRule /pub/wiv/(.*).asx$ >ajp://theTomcatBox:8009/pub/wiv?seoNa

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Help Needed

2006-01-03 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Two things you can do:   1. If you are not using the load-balancing or fail-over functionalities provided by mod_weblogic, yank the whole module out and use ProxyPass instead. 2. Contact BEA support.   -ascs From: sujoy pramanick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 200

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rev. proxy query problems

2006-01-04 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
The reason why you probably did not get any replies to your previous postings on this subject is that you do not provide any useful information about the problem you are experiencing apart from "I have a rev proxy problem", "it used to work", "Page cannot be displayed" which says nothing about y

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] More than one name-based vhost with SSL

2006-01-04 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
The same server certificate is presented by both sites and the CN does not match any of the FQDN. Therefore you get a security warning on both URLs. That's what's wrong. The requests will always be served by the first (default) NVH which IP address/port matches the VirtualHost definition regard

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] More than one name-based vhost with SSL

2006-01-04 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
In your conf below, you use the same certificate in both VH although the ServerName are different. All requests will be handled by the grundfunk VH regardless of whether you request grundfunk.de or ronalter.de. If you add CustomLog /etc/apache2/log/grundfunk_access_log combined to the grund

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] More than one name-based vhost with SSL

2006-01-04 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
the VHs, you will always get a security warning no matter what. -ascs -Original Message- From: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 5:45 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] More than one name-based vhost with SSL In your conf below, you use

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] More than one name-based vhost with SSL

2006-01-04 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
How can I possibly have lived for so long without knowing about that web site? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 5:37 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] More than one name-based vhost with SSL

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] More than one name-based vhost with SSL

2006-01-04 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] More than one name-based vhost with SSL On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV wrote: > In your case you have the same certificate specified in both VHs, but > since that certificate does not match the ServerName n

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] More than one name-based vhost with SSL

2006-01-05 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] More than one name-based vhost with SSL Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV wrote: > In your conf below, you use the same certificate in both VH although the > ServerName are different. > >All requests will be handled by the grundfunk VH r

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] help work with Proxy pass option

2006-01-05 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
ProxyPass / http://www.yahoomail.com/ will pass all requests to www.yahoomail.com You may also want to add ProxyPassReverse / http://www.yahoomail.com/ -ascs From: senthil kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 6:54 AM To: users@http

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to change User-Agent in apache 1.3 runnin as a proxy?

2006-01-05 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Try Header set User-Agent foobar You will need mod_headers. -ascs -Original Message- From: Zlotorzynski, Piotr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 9:57 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to change User-Agent in apache 1.3 runnin as a pr

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to change User-Agent in apache 1.3 runnin as a proxy?

2006-01-05 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
of HTTP response headers. So it works only for setting response headers of a web server, as I understand. pz -Original Message- From: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 10:05 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewrite gurus help? (with mod_proxy_ajp)

2006-01-05 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
he.org >Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewrite gurus help? (with mod_proxy_ajp) > >Yes I am using 2.2, for the advantages mod_proxy_ajp was supposed to have over >mod_jk. Now I am rethinking that decision... > >I will use the logging for more insight, thanks for that tip as we

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewrite gurus help? (with mod_proxy_ajp)

2006-01-05 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Generally speaking this will cause no problem unless the backend server issues a HTTP 302 (or other redirection) with a Location header that needs the reverse transformation. I do not know if that could ever happen in the case of AJP, but imagine the Tomcat issues a redirect to ajp://theTomcatB

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] help work with Proxy pass option

2006-01-05 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
I am not sure I understood all of that, but... When it comes to the yahoomail stuff, the reason you get redirected to www.yahoomail.com is that you are missing the ProxyPassReverse directive. ProxyPassReverse / http://www.yahoomail.com/ However, I am not quite sure that what you actually wan

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Perl cgi question

2006-01-05 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
It seems obvious that there is no file /Users/sdavis/Documents/workspace/DogDB/lib/Dog/HTML/DogForm.pm But on the other hand it could be too obvious to be true. Otherwise I thought it was necessary to set "Options ExecCGI"... -ascs -Original Message- From: Sean Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PR

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Losing session -- mod_rewrite

2006-01-09 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
You need to look into the cookie domain and cookie path of the session cookies returned to the browser. It may be that these values are such that the browser does not send the cookie with the following request. To look at these values, use LiveHTTPHeaders or HTTPWatch (Firefox and IE resp.) to

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Override SSLVerifyClient

2006-01-09 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Reverse the order of the two Location sections. -ascs -Original Message- From: Azwan Adli Abdullah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 9:14 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Override SSLVerifyClient Hi All, I have 1 question regarding howto o

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Max number of connections from a single client to a server.

2006-01-10 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
There are several parameters that determine the maximum number of connections. Only one of them is an Apache parameter: MaxClients. In addition to this, there are system limits that restrict the number of connections a single process may accept. If you use the worker MPM of Apache 2.x, the ma

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Override SSLVerifyClient

2006-01-10 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 6:11 PM To: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV Cc: users@httpd.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Override SSLVerifyClient Hi, Tried that but also doesn't work. Any other clue? Rgds, Azwan > Reverse the order of the two

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Max number of connections from a single client to a server.

2006-01-10 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
After re-reading the original post, I observe the mention of "from a single client". There is nothing that limits the number of connections from any particular client. -ascs -Original Message----- From: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 11:09 AM

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to disable public_html

2006-01-12 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Stupid question: Did you restart you Apache server following your modification ?? -ascs -Original Message- From: Jain, Abhay K, ALABS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 8:00 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to disable public_html

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache reverse and caching proxy

2006-01-12 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
The mod_expires that you activate with "ExpiresActive On" will add an Expires header to the responses sent to the client. It does nothing for Apache cache expiration. It does however have an effect on the expiration of downstream caches, in your case probably on the User Agent cache. For cache

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache reverse and caching proxy

2006-01-12 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
what you are trying to tell me, I should add the "expiresactive on" directive on the source server instead of the caching server? Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/01/2006 15:12 Please respond to u

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Meaninf of [L]

2006-01-13 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
The easiest way to get an answer for such questions is to consult the Apache manual, in your case http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_rewrite.html#rewriterule   -ascs From: senthil kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 10:32 AMTo: users@httpd.apache.orgSubject

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_deflate question

2006-01-15 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
It actually seems like the size of the contents is increased by mod_deflate... but yes, it is definitely processed by mod_deflate. The reason why the compressed content is bigger than the input probably is that the amount of data is so small. Regarding the compression level, be aware that you m

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ProxyPass does not work with hostnames only IP's. (mod_proxyApache 1.3)

2006-01-16 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
I will assume that you are using Apache 2.0 or newer. In that case, in addition to mod_proxy, you need to include the mod_proxy_http module. -ascs -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 1:41 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subj

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ProxyPass does not work with hostnames onlyIP's.(mod_proxyApache 1.3)

2006-01-16 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
/ You should now get some pretty detailed logs about what is happening. -ascs -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 2:10 PM To: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV Cc: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ProxyPass does not

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ProxyPass does not work with hostnamesonlyIP's.(mod_proxyApache 1.3)

2006-01-16 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 2:27 PM To: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV Cc: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ProxyPass does not work with hostnamesonlyIP's.(mod_proxyApache 1.3) Does that rewrite rule do exactly the same as ProxyPass? Anyway, same

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ProxyPass does not work withhostnamesonlyIP's.(mod_proxyApache 1.3)

2006-01-16 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
I think Joshua's advice was pretty sound. Somebody on an OpenBSD list may have run into this problem previously, and he was certainly right about the chroot stuff... Before closing the subject you could look into the /var/www/etc directory and see if you find a resolv.conf file, and if not you

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SSL Logs and AWStats

2006-01-17 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Your non-SSL virtual host logs to access_log using the "combined" log format which AWStats parses correctly. Your SSL virtual host logs to access_log using the "common" format (by default). Since the "combined" format is parsed correctly, I suggest that you replace the TransferLog directive in

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SSL Logs and AWStats

2006-01-18 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
That's exactly what I was suggesting. -ascs -Original Message- From: Mark McCulligh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 4:08 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SSL Logs and AWStats Joshua Slive wrote: >On 1/18/06, Mark McCulligh <[EMA

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AddOutputFilterByType MIME wildcards?

2006-01-20 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
I never managed to make AddOutputFilterByType work properly for DEFLATE. There is a Bugzilla report that basically says that it does not work and is beyond salvation. You should try using mod_filter; that's what I ended up doing. Although mod_filter is an Apache 2.2 module, it is perfectly comp

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AddOutputFilterByType MIME wildcards?

2006-01-22 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AddOutputFilterByType MIME wildcards? On 1/20/06, Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> I never managed to make AddOutputFilterByType work properly for DEFLATE. There is a Bugzilla report that basically says that it does not work and is beyond

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem compiling 2.2.0 on solaris 8 with enabling so

2006-01-24 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Since when did libexpat become a module?? The symbol XmlInitUnknownEncoding is defined in srclib/apr-util/xml/expat/lib/xmltok.c which is part of libexpat. So its plain impossible for XmlInitUnknownEncoding not to be defined. Have you tried to do an "ldd -v libexpat.so.0" to see if there is any

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Large SSL Form Proxy Problem with 2.0.55 - REPOST

2006-01-24 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Have you searched http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla ?? http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37145 -ascs From: Mark Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 8:16 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Large

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to execute cgi on a proxied host ?

2006-01-24 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Annie, You do not specify what version of Apache you are using. My understanding is that there is a content server somewhere that also hosts cgi-scripts, and you have put a reverse proxy in front of that server. You do NOT want CGI scripts to be executed on the reverse proxy. Have you tested

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] External Modules

2006-01-24 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/developer/ is a good starting point. There is also something called "The Apache Modeling Project" that has written a pretty nice document about the Apache server design. -ascs -Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William S

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] External Modules

2006-01-24 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Forgot the link: http://f-m-c.org/projects/apache/index.php -Original Message- From: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 8:54 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] External Modules http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/developer/ is a good

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to execute cgi on a proxied host ?

2006-01-25 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Allow from all where /usr/lib/cgi-bin/ is the absolute path to cgi folder on 10.10.10.10 It doesn't work either,and perhaps was it a nut thing to do. So if you have an idea ... Thanks for help. cordialement. annie Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV a écrit : Annie, You do n

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Multiple httpd instances on startup? (OS X)

2006-01-26 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
What do you mean by "instances"?? Do you mean that there are 5 httpd processes? Could you list the output of "httpd -l" and the value of your StartServers configuration parameter? -ascs -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 26, 20

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Multiple httpd instances on startup? (OS X)

2006-01-26 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
iple httpd instances on startup? (OS X) ---- "Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What do you mean by "instances"?? > > Do you mean that there are 5 httpd processes? > > Could you list the output of "httpd -l" and the value of

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to execute cgi on a proxied host ?

2006-01-26 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
ED] How to execute cgi on a proxied host ? Hi Axel-Stéphane, AddModule mod_proxy was after AddModule mod_cgi. I try to change the ordering : no effect :-( Regards, annie Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV a écrit : >In Apache 1.3 the order in which the modules are executed depends on the order >i

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to execute cgi on a proxied host ?

2006-01-26 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 2:20 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to execute cgi on a proxied host ? Le 26 janv. 06 à 17:00, Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV a écrit : > Could you provide me with your list of AddModule directives as w

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] problem hosting a webpage in apache(asap)..

2006-01-27 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Hey guys, wake up! Where do you think Mohan got the HTTP 404 from??? There are two possibilities: 1. It was the apache httpd server that actually served the HTTP 404 in which case Mohan did not put the file in the right place. Check the DocumentRoot and make sure the file is in that directory 2

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] problem hosting a webpage in apache(asap)..

2006-01-27 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Some web server replied with a HTTP 404, whether apache or another. What you need to find out is whether it was Apache that replied. Supposing your ServerRoot is d:/apache2 and your ErrorLog is logs/error.log, please post the relevant parts of the file d:\apache2\logs\error.log If Apache is ac

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] problem hosting a webpage in apache(asap)..

2006-01-27 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Open an Internet explorer on your apache server host. Go to File > Open Paste D:\Apache2\htdocs\status.html into the field and press Return. What happens then? -ascs From: mohan devanoor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 9:59 AM To: u

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache not working

2006-01-29 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
I guess that you had Apache 1.3 directives in your httpd.conf that do no longer exist in Apache 2.0. Chances are that your server was not even running. Also, whenever you require assistance, be more specific in your problem description. "It doesn't work" just doesn't do it... Rule #1 when debu

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] problem regarding cgi permissions(asap)

2006-01-30 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
I thought you were supposed to use slashes "/" rather than back-slashes"\" in httpd.conf, even on Windows servers. What about replacing "D:\Apache2\htdocs\sample" with "D:/Apache2/htdocs/sample" ?? -ascs From: mohan devanoor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] permissions problem

2006-01-31 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
The error log says that the file Apache is trying to read is /radar/data/hi3.html. The error log normally will report the absolute file system path contrary to the access log that reports the URL path requested. At the same time, from the information given, it is my understanding that the URL

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] only allowing specific hosts via https proxy

2006-02-01 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Do you have both proxymatch blocks in the same configuration ?? -ascs -Original Message- From: Sebastian Reitenbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 10:41 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] only allowing specific hosts via https proxy H

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Not seeing helloworld.html in /var/www/htdocs

2006-02-01 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
What do the access and error log files say? -ascs -Original Message- From: myles dolan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 12:51 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Not seeing helloworld.html in /var/www/htdocs Good Morning I have a basic

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] only allowing specific hosts via https proxy

2006-02-01 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
The thing is that the URL requested by the CONNECT method is not prefixed with http://. Therefore, will never match anything unless the host name is https. The following wil disallow access to http://www.forbidden.com/ (which translates into "GET http://www.forbidden.com/";) but allow anything

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redirecting http traffic to an https virtual host

2006-02-03 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
The rewrite condition is superfluous, and furthermore it is not because the connection is on port 443 that it is necessarily SSL. Either you have "SSLEngine On" within that virtual host, or you don't: that's what determines whether the VH uses SSL or not. A better way of testing is to use the %

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reverse proxy with proxy-html

2006-02-06 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
I have not used mod_proxy_html extensively, and it has been a while now, but from the understanding I have it will do textual substitution of links in a HTML document with another string. Therefore nothing prevents you from using a pattern that will match any part of the link URL, including the

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get original user host name through reverse proxy

2006-02-06 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
There was recently a thread on this subject on this list. The solution consisted of using a module that fiddles with the X-Forwarded-For header. The exact name of the thread was "[EMAIL PROTECTED] reverse proxy - forward ip" -ascs -Original Message- From: Mr Alex Eydelberg [mailto:[EMAI

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Many virtual hosts on 80 port and one on 443 (SSL)

2006-02-06 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
What about this: RewriteEngine ON RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} =virtualhost RewriteRule .* - [F] or alternatively RewriteEngine ON RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !=sslservername RewriteRule .* - [F] Instead or returning a HTTP 403 you could redirect the request to the apropriate URL: RewriteEngine ON

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Why the sudden need to raise MaxClients?

2006-02-08 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
I am surprised to learn that the default value for MaxClients on a Debian install is as low as 20. The value of MaxClients depends on a number of factors including the number of requests per second and the time required to serve each request. The longer it takes to serve a request, the longer a

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reverse proxy and cache

2006-02-16 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
All I see here is a document actually being saved to cache. It does not show the cache modules declining the request because the document is not in cache. I can therefore only assume that the document was NOT in cache when the request was issued. There are request headers that will prevent a do

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Virtual Host Configuration Question

2006-02-17 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Don't know about mod_jk, but if you are not using any particular functionality of the module other than tranferring the request to a backend server, you might just as well use reverse proxying. I would think something like this would work: Listen *:80 RewriteEngine On UseCanonicalName Off Proxy

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_jk and mod_rsp

2006-02-17 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
The order in which the modules are loaded is not significant from version 2.0 on. It is the module developer who determines when the different hooks should be executed, and whether some other modules should be executed before or after. This happens during hook registration. If you take a look at

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: RewriteRule being ignored

2006-02-21 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
If memory serve me right, all mod_proxy hooks execute before mod_rewrite in Apache 2.0. Module ordering is irrelevant. -ascs -Original Message- From: Joost de Heer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 10:23 AM To: David Hull Cc: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EM

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: RewriteRule being ignored

2006-02-21 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
ary 21, 2006 4:53 PM To: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: RewriteRule being ignored Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV wrote: > If memory serve me right, all mod_proxy hooks execute before > mod_rewrite in Apache 2.0. Module or

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] signal Segmentation fault (11)

2006-03-07 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
You need to get the core file and load it into a debugger in order to try to figure out where the signal is raised. How to get the core file depends on your OS. On Solaris you need to enable core dumps using coreadm. I believe that by default the core file should be generated in the apache root

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reverse proxy help

2006-03-08 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
If you want your clients to access OWA through HTTPS you need to add the directives you mention below to you SSL-enabled virtual host (probably to what you refer as ssl.conf). You should have a section starting with or similar somewhere in your configuration. That section contains "SSLEngine O

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Looking for some examples of how to use ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain ...

2006-03-08 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
ServerName www.public.foobar.com ProxyPass /foobar http://www.internal.foobar.com/ ProxyPassReverse /foobar http://www.internal.foobar.com/ ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain .internal.foobar.com .public.foobar.com ProxyPassReverseCookiePath / /foobar What you should do is look at what cookies are

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_cache: CacheDefaultExpire is ignored?

2006-03-08 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
The problem is that the response contains no cache validator: no Last-Modified, no E-Tag. If it contains no cache validator, it must contain an explicit expiry date in order to be cacheable. Look at sections 13.3 and 13.4 of RFC 2616. Your problem is typical of files generated by a servlet, or

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Looking for some examples of how to use ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain ...

2006-03-08 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
There is an example here: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_proxy.html#proxypassreverse -Original Message- From: Nick Kew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 5:38 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Looking for some examples of how t

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_cache: CacheDefaultExpire is ignored?

2006-03-09 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
ave little control over the output from the CGI program, but maybe mod_expires or mod_headers can add the header before mod_cache evaluates the response? Kind regards, Frans Knibbe Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV wrote: > The problem is that the response contains no cache validator: no > Last-Mo

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Configuring Apache 2 with Tomcat 5.11

2006-03-09 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Nick, I really did not get this. To me it is clear that using a front-end web server for serving static contents and proxying other requests to a back-end application server, whether being Tomcat, Sun, BEA, IBM or other, offloads the application server and improves overall performance of an (J2

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Finding what module are installed

2006-03-13 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
The surest way to get that list is to ask the OS. On Solaris, use "pldd `cat /httpd.pid`". I'm sure there are similar tools on other Unices. -ascs From: Thomas Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2006 6:31 AM To: users@httpd.apache.or

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] $HTTPD -k $ARGV

2006-03-23 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Could sound like there is a problem with the added module. Does Apache start when you remove those two lines you added ? -ascs -Original Message- From: Kaushal Shriyan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 8:16 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] $

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] what is the minimod modules list for apache to load on SunOs

2006-03-23 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
For any module you remove, you must also remove the associated configuration directives. The configuration is parsed by each module, so if you remove for example mod_ssl, you must remove all directives defined in mod_ssl such as SSLEngine, from your configuration file(s). If you remove mod_mime,

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] $HTTPD -k $ARGV

2006-03-24 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
If that were the case, I do not think the apachectl execution would even have gotten as far as line 99. Furthermore I hardly think "Illegal instruction" is a shell script error. It may however very well be an error issued by the VlApache20_32 module. -ascs -Original Message- From: Boyl

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] concurrent connections (httpd.conf) X PHP sessions are the same thing ?

2006-03-24 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Nope. It's 150 simultaneous TCP connections. -ascs -Original Message- From: Luiz Eduardo Gualti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 2:01 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] concurrent connections (httpd.conf) X PHP sessions are the same thing ?

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] $HTTPD -k $ARGV

2006-03-26 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
e Grüsse (?) -ascs -Original Message- From: Boyle Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 4:04 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] $HTTPD -k $ARGV > -Original Message- > From: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] making Apache work with WebLogic

2006-03-29 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
The fact that the run-time linker tries to look for the C library in the /sybase directory only means that /sybase is in the search path. On Solaris there are several ways of defining the search path for dynamic linking. First of all there is a system default. Then a search path can be added to

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Location question

2006-04-05 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Wouldn't the problem rather be that Location should be replaced by LocationMatch ?? -ascs -Original Message- From: Boyle Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 2:31 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Location question > -Original Mes

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Error 416 Request Range Not Satisfiable

2006-04-05 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Makes me a little curious because I have never seen any browser make a Range request. I wonder what prompted the browser to make a Range request rather than just request the whole document. Could be worthwhile to ask the client to flush the browser cache... -ascs -Original Message- Fro

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: failure notice

2006-04-05 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
>From the top of my head you also need to be root in order to do setuid/setgid >to change the process owner according to the User and Group configuration >directives. -ascs -Original Message- From: David Salisbury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 7:08 PM To: us

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] A lil Mod Rewrite help please...

2006-04-09 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
What about something like this? RewriteEngine On RewriteLog logs/rewrite_log RewriteLogLevel 9 RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^(webmail\.[^:]+) RewriteRule .* http://%1:7080/webmail.exe [R] -ascs < -Original Message- From: m i l e s [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday,

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] weird caching problem

2006-04-09 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
A HTTP response is cacheable if it contains a cache validator (ETag, Last-Modified) or an Expires header (or both), provided neither the response or the request that elicited it contain a Cache-Control header explicitely forbidding caching. If the response is cached, it must contain one of the a

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Session handling when Time is changed on the machine where apache http server is running

2006-04-11 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Apache does not know about sessions. HTTP is stateless. If you are running PHP, it's a PHP problem. -ascs From: Durga Prasad (duprasad) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 9:52 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sessio

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Session handling when Time is changed on the machine where apache http server is running

2006-04-11 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
handled by apache. Thanks, Durga -Original Message- From: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 1:29 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Session handling when Time is changed on the machine where apache http server is running

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Session handling when Time is changed on the machine where apache http server is running

2006-04-11 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
ot; twice after the last line) Does the server respond? Why would you need to change the time of the server ? -ascs -Original Message----- From: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 10:33 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Session handling when Tim

  1   2   3   4   5   >