[users@httpd] Apache support for Brotli?

This is supported in the newest Firefox, is it supported in Apache? -- Watch your mouth, kid, or you're gonna find yourself floating home. ---

[users@httpd] Re: How to load an image with out extension in browser

On Feb 16, 2016, at 2:02 AM, Aravin wrote: > Before we upgrade the apache 2.4 the below image url can be viewable through > browsers. but after upgraded the apache we are not able to view this image > > http://www.mytechlogy.com/upload/f457c545a9ded88f18ecee47145a72c01411190633050_5R4EHmGwkmmVaSa

[users@httpd] Ache 2.4 and LetsEncrypt

After setting up lets encrypt on my server and running it I end up with the following files: $ ls -nls total 48 8 -rw--- 1 443 443 1854 Mar 4 23:38 cert-1457159890.csr 0 -rw--- 1 443 443 0 Mar 4 23:38 cert-1457159890.pem 8 -rw--- 1 443 443 1854 Mar 5 05:06 cert-14571795

[users@httpd] Re: Cannot run CGI scripts in user directory

On Sat May 21 2016 21:05:45 Alessandro Resaid: > > That seems odd. All of my ifmodule tests had the form (without a .c or .so or anything) -- W is for WINNIE embedded in ice X is for XERXES devoured by mice - To

[users@httpd] Re: CLOSED - Re: [users@httpd] Macros + Require constructs

On Jun 16, 2016, at 8:56 PM, John Allen wrote: > On 2016-06-15 11:52 PM, John Allen wrote: >> I just did some testing and it doesn't work as I had hoped. the Require >> valid-user is applied in all cases not just in the case of the Common space! >> >> I had tried >> >> >> >>

[users@httpd] Re: Issues migrating Weblogic proxies from Sun One 6.1 to Apache 2.4

On Jun 17, 2016, at 8:30 AM, Joe Muller wrote: > Any ideas ? I thought Apache would work better then Sun One, but this has > been the opposite. Is there some fundamental webserver tunable parameter that > is so different between out of the box Sun One and out of the box Apache that > could be c

[users@httpd] apache 2.4 core dump on launch, no error logging

When launching apache 2.4 I get a core dump. Nothing is logged to the http-error log. I’ve tried rebuilding it to no avail. Ideas? /var/log/message: Nov 16 11:59:02 mail kernel: pid 63178 (httpd), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) # gdb /usr/local/sbin/httpd /usr/local/httpd.core GNU

[users@httpd] Re: apache 2.4 core dump on launch, no error logging

On Nov 17, 2016, at 3:56 AM, Nick Kew wrote: > On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 12:12 -0700, @lbutlr wrote: >> When launching apache 2.4 I get a core dump. Nothing is logged to the >> http-error log. I’ve tried rebuilding it to no avail. Ideas? >> > At the top of your coredump

[users@httpd] Re: apache 2.4 core dump on launch, no error logging

On Nov 17, 2016, at 8:08 AM, @lbutlr wrote: > PCRE-8.39 is installed. I’m not sure how to tell if http is trying to access > a different version. # apachectl -M Loaded Modules: core_module (static) so_module (static) http_module (static) mpm_prefork_module (static) authn_file_

[users@httpd] Re: apache 2.4 core dump on launch, no error logging

On Nov 17, 2016, at 9:15 AM, Rainer Canavan wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:08 PM, @lbutlr wrote: >> On Nov 17, 2016, at 3:56 AM, Nick Kew wrote: >>> On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 12:12 -0700, @lbutlr wrote: >>>> When launching apache 2.4 I get a core dump. Nothing is

[users@httpd] Re: apache 2.4 core dump on launch, no error logging

On Nov 17, 2016, at 2:39 PM, Nick Kew wrote: > On Thu, 2016-11-17 at 08:08 -0700, @lbutlr wrote: >> On Nov 17, 2016, at 3:56 AM, Nick Kew wrote: >>> On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 12:12 -0700, @lbutlr wrote: >>>> When launching apache 2.4 I get a core dump. Nothing is logg

[users@httpd] Re: apache 2.4 core dump on launch, no error logging

On Nov 17, 2016, at 8:44 PM, @lbutlr wrote: > If there is an old openSSL lurking somewhere, I cannot find it. I have 1.0.2j > installed and working with dovecot/postfix. > > Scouring around I did find a directory > > /usr/local/lib/php/20100525/ > > which I’ve now mov

[users@httpd] Re: Could not initialize random number generator

On Nov 22, 2016, at 11:11 PM, Hemant Chaudhary wrote: > [pid 754974769] (os 0x07f541f0)Unrecognized resolver error: AH00141: Could > not initialize random number generator. This is often caused by a bad PATH (or a bad character in the PATH) or a missing rng. ---

[users@httpd] more core dumps on apache 2.4

So, I installed roundcube via portmaster, which installed (upgraded) the following: Nov 24 12:02:08 mail pkg-static: icu-58.1,1 installed Nov 24 12:03:00 mail pkg-static: pecl-intl-3.0.0_7 installed Nov 24 12:03:11 mail pkg-static: php56-ldap-5.6.27 installed Nov 24 12:03:17 mail pkg-static: roun

[users@httpd] Re: ProxyPass not working?

On Dec 10, 2016, at 2:20 PM, Erik Dobák wrote: > what is ajp? https://www.google.com/search?q=apache%20ajp - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.o

[users@httpd] Re: ProxyPass not working?

On Dec 11, 2016, at 2:50 PM, Erik Dobák wrote: > https://www.google.com/search?q=ifiwantedtousegoogleiwouldnotask What about if you wanted to not quote hundreds of lines to TOFU a single trivial query you could have answered yourself in literally seconds? -

[users@httpd] Re: proxypass does'nt seem to work on apache 2.4.25

On 2017-02-17 (12:57 MST), Christopher Schultz wrote: > > - -chris Please fix your signature delimiter. It should be two dashes, a space, and end of line, no more, no less. See below. -- Apple broke AppleScripting signatures in Mail.app, so no random signatures. -

[users@httpd] Re: proxypass does'nt seem to work on apache 2.4.25

On 18 Feb 2017, at 05:22, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:09 PM, @lbutlr wrote: >> On 2017-02-17 (12:57 MST), Christopher Schultz >> wrote: >>> >>> - -chris >> >> Please fix your signature delimiter. It should be two dashes, a

[users@httpd] apache 2.4 and php on Freebsd

Is anyone running Apache 2.4 and mod_php (either 5.6 or 7.0)? Despite many times building out of ports or manually, I cannot get apache to launch successfully with php enabled. Is there something else I can do to get php working? I can get apache to load with mod_php56, but loading php pages r

[users@httpd] Re: ''AH00288: scoreboard is full, not at MaxRequestWorkers'

On 29 Aug 2017, at 02:01, David Hodgkinson wrote: > Get behind Cloudflare. They have DDoS protection. That requires giving your private certs to cloud flare. It's an option, it is not a very good option. -- Apple broke AppleScripting signatures in Mail.app, so no random signatures. -

[users@httpd] Re: Support for http/2 in Apache HTTPD?

On 22 Feb 2015, at 17:16 , Andre-John mas wrote: > Can anyone tell me whether Apache supports http/2 No. I just asked this a couple of weeks ago. > and if not what the roadmap is? I am having trouble finding any useful > information on the subject - I did do a search. Yeah, there’s not much o

[users@httpd] Re: Support for http/2 in Apache HTTPD?

On Feb 23, 2015, at 4:34 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Chrome and IE are pushing for HTTP/2 sooner rather than later. Hopefully it >> will be quick to come to apache because it certainly sounds like a major >> improvement. > > "major" is a bit of an exaggeration :) I don’t think so, major may b

[users@httpd] Re: Support for http/2 in Apache HTTPD?

On Feb 23, 2015, at 5:39 PM, curtis wrote: > A little research found that apache supports http/2 via the mod_spdy module. No, that is not correct. SPDY is a precursor to HTTP/2 and is *not* HTTP/2. Also, SPDY does not work in Apache 2.4. -- "Is that a star?" "Nah, that's Ted Danson." --

[users@httpd] compile and install from source

Downloaded and compiled bind-9.9.7 and it built fine (./configure && make && make install). but /usr/sbin/named is still 9.8 If I try to start named (service named start), it starts this version instead of the version in /usr/local/sbin I assume I need to either replace /etc/rc.d/named or fix

[users@httpd] Re: compile and install from source

> On Mar 29, 2015, at 00:46, @lbutlr wrote: > > Downloaded and compiled bind-9.9.7 and it built fine (./configure && make && > make install). but /usr/sbin/named is still 9.8 > > If I try to start named (service named start), it starts this version inste

[users@httpd] Re: compile and install from source

On Mar 29, 2015, at 12:53, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On 03/29/2015 03:05 AM, @lbutlr wrote: >>> On Mar 29, 2015, at 00:46, @lbutlr wrote: >>> >>> Downloaded and compiled bind-9.9.7 and it built fine (./configure && make >>> && make install).

[users@httpd] Re: compile and install from source

> On Mar 29, 2015, at 17:34, @lbutlr wrote: Argh! Did it again! Sorry! -- And the three men I admire most, the father son and the holly ghost they caught the last train for the coast... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: us

[users@httpd] Re: Deny didn't work

On Tue May 05 2015 12:29:14 joshuasm...@scbwi.org said: > > I have installed "fail2ban", but I just left it at the default > configuration. Do I need to start working with that? Does fail2Ban do anything with Wordpress login attempts? I think you need a WP plugin for that.

[users@httpd] Setting up Apache 2.4 with Letsencrypt

I have dehydrate properly renewing certs from Let's Encrypt (which I am using successfully for mail authentication) and I ma trying to get them working for Apache 2.4, but no luck so far. I created aliases in /usr/local/etc/apache24/ pointing to the files in /usr/local/etc/dehydrated/certs/doma

[users@httpd] Re: Setting up Apache 2.4 with Letsencrypt

On 13 Feb 2018, at 06:43, Marat Khalili wrote: > But I just get a failed to load error and I don't see anything helpful in the > logs. >> >> I tried removing the links in the apache24 folder and copying the .pem files >> (privkey.pem to ssl.key), but still get an unable to establish secure >>

[users@httpd] Re: "apachectl -S" and DocumentRoot

On 13 Feb 2018, at 10:24, Rose, John B wrote: > is a nice command. We are looking for something that outputs the > "DocumentRoot" for all virtual hosts > grep -ir documentroot /usr/local/etc/httpd/ (Or wherever your https.conf lives) DocumentRoot "/usr/local/www/apache24/data" DocumentRoot

[users@httpd] Re: Retry connection to reverse proxy backend

On 13 Feb 2018, at 13:35, Yves Goergen wrote: > Moving to modern and usable web platforms next time Web platforms also require registration and such. They are also much lower to access and invariably have much worse search as well. True, you can probably search them via google, but the chances

[users@httpd] Re: How to browse to index.php OR index.html on WordPress site?

On 2018-02-22 (15:38 MST), Kent West wrote: > > But I still need to manually be able to get to the full-blown .php-based > site. When I web-browse to sitename/index.php, it reroutes to > sitename/index.html. If I change the .conf file to "DirectoryIndex index.html > index.php" and restart Apac

[users@httpd] Re: How to browse to index.php OR index.html on WordPress site?

On 22 Feb 2018, at 20:52, Kent West wrote: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 7:32 PM, @lbutlr wrote: > > If I'm understanding you, this is not what I want; both index.html and > index.php exist. I just need a means of picking either via URL. Which I am able to do. In fact,

[users@httpd] Re: How to browse to index.php OR index.html on WordPress site?

On 2018-02-23 (07:24 MST), Kent West wrote: > > I apologize for being uneducated about Apache2, but I'm not quite up on > "vhost". Are your lines above something I should put verbatim into my > /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/sitename.conf file, or am I supposed to tailor > them to my specific sett

[users@httpd] Re: How to browse to index.php OR index.html on WordPress site?

On 2018-02-24 (08:32 MST), Kent West wrote: > > And yet, no one's been able to tell me how to do it. We have. Eliminate the rewrites/redirects. The fact is that what you want to do is the DEFAULT behavior of apache. It will serve the file you ask for UNLESS something else tells it not to. Ba

[users@httpd] Suggestion on Redirect parsing

The syntax for redirect treats Redirect / http://www.example.com as a request to redirect, for example, index.html as "http://www.example.com.index.html"; Since I can't think of any reason that this could possibly be desired, it seems the parser should understand that when only a FQDN is spec

[users@httpd] Re: How to browse to index.php OR index.html on WordPress site?

On 2018-02-24 (16:33 MST), Kent West wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 4:27 PM, @lbutlr wrote: >> On 2018-02-24 (08:32 MST), Kent West wrote: >> >>> And yet, no one's been able to tell me how to do it. > >> We have. Eliminate the rewrites/redirects

[users@httpd] Re: Suggestion on Redirect parsing

On 2018-02-24 (17:16 MST), Frank Gingras wrote: > > No, it would produce http://www.example.comindex.html Not what I've seen. www.example.com is actually "www.example.com." as all domains are terminated by a '.', it just doesn't often have to be present. > The directive allows for optional tra

[users@httpd] Re: Suggestion on Redirect parsing

On 2018-02-24 (19:31 MST), Eric Covener wrote: > > I tried three different maintenance levels and they all produced > "Location: http://www.example.com"; with that config and request. Yes, you're right. I was looking at logs where the initial path query started with a period. oops. Still, my p

[users@httpd] Re: Rewriting SSI URLs

On 2018-03-15 (18:34 MDT), Jim Albert wrote: > > Googling for advice on this presents almost zero relevant results except one > indicating that rewriting an SSI is not possible, so perhaps that is the > definitive answer. That was my belief, but it has been many many years since I used SSI. -

[users@httpd] Re: VirtualHost Problems

On 24 Mar 2018, at 12:52, Jerry Malcolm wrote: > The problem is that when I go to http://domainA it redirects (and changes the > URL on the browser) to https://domainB. If I go straight to https://domainA > it works correctly. Order appears to matter a whole lot. I had a lot of weird issues un

[users@httpd] Re: VirtualHost Problems

On 2018-03-24 (15:54 MDT), Frank Gingras wrote: > > Any reason you're using IP:PORT instead of *:PORT to define your vhosts? I copied and pasted the example from the OP. I use *:port in my own configs. - To unsubscribe, e-mai

[users@httpd] TLS 1.3

Now that TLS 1.3 has been approved, what is the status of using it with Apache? Last I heard apache 2.4 couldn't build agains openssl 1.1, but that was a year ago. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org

[users@httpd] Re: TLS 1.3

On 2018-03-28 (09:02 MDT), David Mehler wrote: > > What are some advantages of 1.3? Faster. Less kruft. Drops many near-EOL cryptos. But the main one is that is allows Perfect Forward Secrecy (PFS) which means that even is someone captures the traffic and stores it, and even if they interfere

[users@httpd] Re: TLS 1.3

On Mar 29, 2018, at 02:17, Michael A. Peters wrote: > TLS 1.3 *mandates* PFS so you don't accidentally enable a cipher that does > not have it, and that is a HUGE benefit. Yes, sorry about that. -- This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.

[users@httpd] Re: Distribution repository vs compiled.

On 01 Jun 2018, at 00:09, Mimiko wrote: > Tell me, please, what's better to use in production: > 1) Precompiled binaries of apache httpd from distribution > 2) or Self compiled from sources > > What are the risks for each options and pro and cons of each? Which is better to use in our company ca

[users@httpd] Apache 2.4 and DirectoryIndex and htaccess

I have a working webroot, and it has an index.php file. In httpd.conf I havre DirectoryIndex for /usr/local/www set to “index.php index.html" I create a folder under the webroot named foo and I put an index.html file in the folder. I can access the files directly, but if I access the folder, I

[users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4 and DirectoryIndex and htaccess

No ideas? On 11 Jun 2018, at 12:34, @lbutlr wrote: > I can access the files directly, but if I access the folder, I get a > permission error. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For addi

[users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4 and DirectoryIndex and htaccess

On 13 Jun 2018, at 11:25, Frank Gingras wrote: > What does the error log say, exactly? From the original message: > The only thing in the http-error.log is: > > [Mon Jun 11 12:26:28.390150 2018] [ssl:info] [pid 34433] [client > xx.xx.xx.xx:56493] AH01964: Connection to child 9 established … >

[users@httpd] Re: Website Down - Help Really Needed

On 18 Jun 2018, at 13:21, Macksymil Marketplace wrote: > sudo -i /etc/apache2/sites-available/000-default.conf-bash: > /etc/apache2/sites-available/000-default.conf: Permission denied Not sure why you’re using sudo? The error in the screenshot specifically points to line 31 in the conf file a

[users@httpd] Re: [OT] bounced messages

On 13 Aug 2018, at 13:43, James Moe wrote: > > I received a note from the list manager complaining that our server > has rejected an unconscionable number of message. > Has there been some configuration change of the mailing list recently? > > There are reasons for the rejections: our SPAM fil

[users@httpd] Re: How do I enable HTTP or HTTPS Redirection on my Apache HTTP servers to my Blogger and Wordpress blogs?

On 13 Aug 2018, at 19:14, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote: > How do I enable HTTP or HTTPS Redirection on my Apache HTTP servers to my > Blogger and Wordpress blogs? Do you mean to blogger.coma nd WordPress.com or are these local to your machine? There are verious ways to redirect, but t

[users@httpd] Re: Testing for apache open relaying

On 05 Sep 2018, at 09:58, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > So I suspect my apache server as a proxy relay. > > Is there a similar site to mxtoolbox that will test apache for improper > relaying? Are you allowing php? You should be able to root out any badly behaved mail scripts. You should check

[users@httpd] DocumentRoot in ProxyPass?

Is it possible to do something along these lines in the apache.conf files? DocumentRoot /usr/local/www/roundcube/ ProxyPassMatch ^/(.*\.php)$ fcgi://127.0.0.1:9000${DocumnetRoot}$1 (that is, not have to repeat the information that is already in the configuration) -- I WAS NOT TOUCHED "THERE"

[users@httpd] Re: DocumentRoot in ProxyPass?

On 19 Sep 2018, at 14:41, Eric Covener wrote: > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 4:35 PM @lbutlr wrote: >> >> Is it possible to do something along these lines in the apache.conf files? >> >> DocumentRoot /usr/local/www/roundcube/ >> ProxyPassMatch ^/(.*\.php)$ fcgi:

[users@httpd] Reverse proxy

If I have a secondary web service service running on www.example.com:8000 and I want to create a reverse proxy on port 8001, how do I prevent users from connecting to :8000 anyway? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@h

[users@httpd] Updating to php 7.0 and having apache still work?

Once again I have tried, and failed, to move from php 5.6 to php 7.0 (using postmaster under FreeBSD 11.3-RELEASE). The results are largely the same, php pages don’t load either "Primary script unknown” or complaints about filter(0 (which is built in to both php56 and php70). I’m sure this is a

[users@httpd] Re: Updating to php 7.0 and having apache still work?

On 28 Sep 2018, at 16:15, Frank Gingras wrote: > Consider the wiki article: > > http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/php That's not helpful. I already have proxy_fcgi working with php56. The issue is that everything breaks whenever I try to update to php70 -- The "H" in Jesus H Christ comes from "H

[users@httpd] Re: Updating to php 7.0 and having apache still work?

On 29 Sep 2018, at 05:59, Frank Gingras wrote: > "Everything breaks" isn't really a useful statement. Be more specific if you > want more precise feedback. I mentioned a couple of the issues in the original post, which are either fcgi cannot find the scripts to run, or there is an error with fi

[users@httpd] Re: Updating to php 7.0 and having apache still work?

On 29 Sep 2018, at 21:02, Frank Gingras wrote: > As for the "filter_var" error, you're missing a php extension/module. No, I'm not. filter is built in to php and is properly listed in php -m On 30 Sep 2018, at 03:43, Carmel NY wrote: > Add the following to the "/etc/make.conf" file: > >

[users@httpd] Re: Updating to php 7.0 and having apache still work?

On 30 Sep 2018, at 12:11, Jonathon Koyle wrote: > Simply to avoid assumptions, did you update php-fpm to 7 as well? php-fpm is built as part of the core php, it is not a separate package. # pkg info php56 php56-5.6.38 Name : php56 Version: 5.6.38 Installed on : Fri Sep 28 09:

[users@httpd] Re: Updating to php 7.0 and having apache still work?

On 01 Oct 2018, at 13:49, Filipe Cifali wrote: > This seems to be a problem inside mod_fcgi and not httpd, proxies in general > don't care about what's the language behind it, as long as the protocol is > being respected. Yes, that was my understanding as well, but even when I recompiled apach

[users@httpd] 0 length robot.txt

This is probably a coincidence, but I had one of my hosted sites (with no php code anywhere, and certainly no .php files) returning a script error on load instead of showing the non-php webpage: [proxy_fcgi:error] [pid 88148] [client xx.xx.xx.xx:63137] AH01071: Got error 'Primary script unknown

[users@httpd] Re: 0 length robot.txt

On 03 Oct 2018, at 11:39, @lbutlr wrote: > Removing that file made the site load properly. Well, it did for about 3h25 minutes, in fact. Just after posting the message, the site went back to showing only “File Not Found” I’m at a loss. The only other issue I see is in the main http-error

[users@httpd] Re: 0 length robot.txt

On 03 Oct 2018, at 12:07, Filipe Cifali wrote: > you can check what virtualhost is being served via apache2ctl like this: $ > apache2ctl -S > $ apache2ctl -h provides this info: > -S : a synonym for -t -D DUMP_VHOSTS -D DUMP_RUN_CFG Yes that is all fine, and the site was loadin

[users@httpd] Re: 0 length robot.txt

On 03 Oct 2018, at 12:27, @lbutlr wrote: > There is exactly one line in the site configuration that, when commented, > makes the site work again. Though, possibly only for a little while. I’ll > have to check more in 3-4 hours. There is no other proxy logic at all. It’ been over 4

[users@httpd] Re: 0 length robot.txt

On 03 Oct 2018, at 18:27, Filipe Cifali wrote: > you can for example turn log level to debug and access the site, tailing the > logs should provide some information about what is breaking. Is it possible to set the log level just for a virtual host? I thought that was a server-wide setting. I t

[users@httpd] Re: 0 length robot.txt

On 04 Oct 2018, at 11:50, Filipe Cifali wrote: > You want to use a CustomLog for virtualhost config to gather the most info > you can from the request: > > https://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_log_config.html#customlog Ugh. That is a terrible bit of documentation written by and for peo

[users@httpd] Re: 0 length robot.txt

On 04 Oct 2018, at 13:20, Filipe Cifali wrote: > And the docs, this project is open source, we can change (or rather, propose > changes) to documentation anytime we want. Sure, but first you have to figure out the multiple layers of complexity in the current docs. -- Boy, it sure would be ni

[users@httpd] Re: 0 length robot.txt

On 03 Oct 2018, at 17:11, @lbutlr wrote: > It’ been over 4 hours now (almost 5) and the site is still responding > perfectly. Well, I am more confused. I changed the log from common to debug and the site has been fine for days now. - CustomLog /home/user/logs/XXX.access_log co

[users@httpd] Re: 0 length robot.txt

On 06 Oct 2018, at 17:59, Filipe Cifali wrote: > It's described on the CustomLog docs: > https://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_log_config.html#customlog > > "The second argument specifies what will be written to the log file. It can > specify either a ***nickname*** defined by a previou

[users@httpd] Re: Failed to acquire SSL session cache lock apache2.4 on Ubuntu 18.04

On 21 Oct 2018, at 01:13, Muhammad Hernawan wrote: > I use Apache/2.4.29 (Ubuntu 18.04). I use http2 and ssl-stapling. Here is the > info: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/1565744 perhaps? (first google hit) -- "But you read a lot of books, I'm thinking. Hard to have fa

[users@httpd] Re: Failed to acquire SSL session cache lock

On 22 Oct 2018, at 08:02, Muhammad Hernawan wrote: > please create new thread for your issue Says the person who posted 4 times for one issue… -- Up the airy mountains, down the rushy glen... From ghosties and bogles and long-leggity beasties... My mother said I never should... We dare not go a

[users@httpd] Re: Warning from users@httpd.apache.org

On 03 Nov 2018, at 07:26, Leland wrote: > Return-Path: <> > Received: (qmail 11330 invoked for bounce); 23 Oct 2018 17:04:55 - > Date: 23 Oct 2018 17:04:55 - > From: mailer-dae...@apache.org > To: users-digest-return-1181...@httpd.apache.org > Subject: failure notice Your mail server reje

[users@httpd] Re: SSL Handshake Exception in call from Android

On 02 Nov 2018, at 14:58, Jerry Malcolm wrote: > The same Android app calls Google Maps https with no problem and also calls > another server with https that I do not own with no problem. So I'm assuming > I have something wrong in my httpd config. But I need some help figuring it > out. Ha

[users@httpd] Re: Configuring redirects from http to https

On Mon Dec 03 2018 12:17:01 Jack M. Nilles said: > > > > Should be just fine. -- And I was grounded while you filled the skies I was dumbfounded by truth; you cut through lies - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-uns

[users@httpd] Re: Graceful shutdown of apache

On 10 Dec 2018, at 10:11, Hemant Chaudhary wrote: > I have updated apache-2.4.29 to apache-2.4.37 but still I am not able to > graceful shutdown in debug mode. What do you mean by a graceful shutdown? The graceful command doesn’t shutdown apache. If you are using graceful-stop then that will

[users@httpd] Re: How to block Apache2 from showing dir lists on Ubuntu 16.04 server...

Bo Berglund wrote: > equire valid-user > Options -Indexes > DirectoryIndex dirlist.php Does you main configuration have AllowOverride? > I even went as far as editing the > /etc/apache2/sites-available/000-default.conf file and adding this to > the end of the directory block: I didn't know that

[users@httpd] apache service unavailable

Due to a large blizzard, we lost power for some period of time today, and the server's UPS didn't hold out. After the power was back, https responds to all attempts to connect with "The service is not available. Please try again later." displayed in the browser. Nothing shows up in the httpd-e

[users@httpd] Re: apache service unavailable

forgot to include the version info. On 13 Mar 2019, at 23:26, @lbutlr wrote: > apachectl -S reports no errors. # apachectl -V Server version: Apache/2.4.37 (FreeBSD) Server built: unknown Server's Module Magic Number: 20120211:83 Server loaded: APR 1.6.5, APR-UTIL 1.6.1 Compiled us

[users@httpd] Re: apache service unavailable

On 13 Mar 2019, at 23:26, @lbutlr wrote: > "The service is not available. Please try again later." Never mind. The issue was not apache related at all, it was a misconfiguration/corruption of pound that came to light after the reboot. -- "We're philosophers. We

[users@httpd] Re: CVE-2019-0211/0215/0217

On 6 Apr 2019, at 08:59, Sunhux G wrote: > Are above CVEs affecting Apache httpd (ie web servers) 2.4.x only > & other lower versions (eg: our Solaris 10's Apache/2.0.63) are not > affected? The CVE lists, explicitly, what versions are affected. "The flaw was discovered by Charles Fol and imp

[users@httpd] Re: Control / Modify the HTTP Status Line

On 22 May 2019, at 12:00, Shmuel Krakower wrote: > I am using Apache for proxying a backend server. > The backend server may return, in some occaisons, a 302 response code for > successful requests. This is incorrect behavior and you should fix that, not try to hack the reply codes. -- "Humor

[users@httpd] Re: Control / Modify the HTTP Status Line

On 22 May 2019, at 14:29, Shmuel Krakower wrote: > I guess I should add few pieces of information. > The client is one SaaS and the backend is another SaaS. The backend returns > 302 which is right but the client consider anything which is not 2xx as error > which cause it to retry. So, that

[users@httpd] Adding perl-cgi in apache 2.4

I need to enable perl-cgi for a specific directory local to a single site. I uncommented cgi in http.conf LoadModule cgid_module libexec/apache24/mod_cgid.so In the conf for the site in question I have the following: AllowOverride All Require all granted AllowOver

Re: [users@httpd] Adding perl-cgi in apache 2.4

On 19 Jun 2019, at 00:25, bret_st...@machinemanagement.com wrote: > Permissions on the executable/.pl > script correct to run when called? Permissions are the same they’ve been since 2004, 777. On 19 Jun 2019, at 05:07, Eric Covener wrote: > bad shebang in the file itself? Suspicious that you

Re: [users@httpd] Adding perl-cgi in apache 2.4

On 19 Jun 2019, at 09:00, Bret Stern wrote: > Your original post log error indicated: > > No such file or directory: AH01241: exec of '/usr/local/www/bi/cgi- > local/b4.pl' failed > > Perhaps the path for cgi scripts has been changed/redifined from the > default in the apache config file # ls

Re: [users@httpd] Adding perl-cgi in apache 2.4

On 18 Jun 2019, at 22:03, @lbutlr wrote: > I need to enable perl-cgi for a specific directory local to a single site. I just punted and rewrote the the script in php. -- You only had to look into Teatime's mismatched eyes to know one thing, which was this: if Teatime wanted to fin

Re: [users@httpd] Blocking particular URL/file patterns

On 2 Jul 2019, at 14:16, James Moe wrote: > /condalia1398.xml.gz > /heling348628-h1819-746-be2dochmiacal-97a2-/6a465d7hll78i1/ … > Is there a way to write a filter that blocks the above URL patterns > without generating a 404 response? Have you looked into robots.txt? And a sitemap? -- "P

Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.4.29 ubuntu 18.04 VirtualHost ssl redirect not working?

On 13 Aug 19, at 10:48 , gene me wrote: > Solution: My mistake was leaving "DocumentRoot" commented out. I thought the > root specification in "80" section might suffice, but no. Once I fixed that - > everything works. All correct pages are shown. > > I think at least a warning from Apache shou

Re: [users@httpd] Issue while generating large documents

On 22 Aug 2019, at 11:03, Santosh Kondapuram wrote: > This e-mail message and any files transmitted with it may contain > confidential and proprietary information and are intended solely for the use > of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. Any unauthorized > review, use, disc

Re: [users@httpd] Has anybody used a SQL database to store static pages without using PHP?

On 1 Sep 2019, at 01:39, timothylegg . wrote: > Can you store an entire static page in an SQL database such as MariaDB > or MySQL and have httpd initiate the database query by parsing the > search parameter from the URL? i.e. > https://www.example.org/benny/index.html would search a table for > "

Re: [users@httpd] protect apache to stop work if logdir is missing

On 9 Sep 2019, at 09:57, Anton Gorlov wrote: > I need the web server to continue working if the user has deleted the log > directory. I would solve this by preventing the user from deleting the directory or recreating it on deletion, not by patching the source code. -- 'There's a kind of mag

Re: [users@httpd] protect apache to stop work if logdir is missing

On 9 Sep 2019, at 10:13, Anton Gorlov wrote: > 09.09.2019 19:07, @lbutlr пишет: >> On 9 Sep 2019, at 09:57, Anton Gorlov >> wrote: >> >>> I need the web server to continue working if the user has deleted the log >>> directory. >>> >> I

Re: [users@httpd] protect apache to stop work if logdir is missing

On Sep 9, 2019, at 11:21 AM, Anton Gorlov wrote: > I need to provide users with the ability to archive logs on their own Yes? And? You’ve been told two ways to do this that do not require modifying the source code. - To unsub

Re: [users@httpd] protect apache to stop work if logdir is missing

On Sep 10, 2019, at 3:39 AM, Anton Gorlov wrote: > 10.09.2019 5:09, @lbutlr пишет: >> On Sep 9, 2019, at 11:21 AM, Anton Gorlov wrote: >>> I need to provide users with the ability to archive logs on their own >> Yes? And? You’ve been told two ways to do this that do not r

Re: [users@httpd] AuthzSendUnauthorizeOnFailure?

On Oct 2, 2019, at 5:53 PM, Jack Simmons wrote: > Is it possible to force apache to return HTTP 401 instead of HTTP [403] if > any condition inside RequireAll fails? The two codes mean different things. 401 basically means “hey, you need to login or login again” (Unauthorized) while 403 means

Re: [users@httpd] Enabling SHA1 for client certificates

On 23 Oct 2019, at 03:49, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > I know that SHA1 is insecure these days, but I have no control over the > algorithms used in this particular CA, and I need to be able to use it. This is a case of pushing back to get the incompetent CA to update. Even if you manage to get Apac

Re: [users@httpd] Enabling SHA1 for client certificates

On 23 Oct 2019, at 09:38, Stefan Eissing wrote: > "WARNING at this time setting the security level higher than 1 for general > internet use is likely to cause considerable interoperability issues and is > not recommended. This is because the SHA1 algorithm is very widely used in > certificates

  1   2   >