[users@httpd] Build problem

2012-05-30 Thread Bill Vance
Howdy; I'm new to the list, so this may allready be addressed somewhere. Basically, I', trying to put the sources for apache2 and php, etc., together, and I seem to be having some heavy wading. 1st off, I seem to have to go searching for every last part and piece of a project that by all account

Re: [users@httpd] Build problem

2012-05-30 Thread Michael Streeter
On 05/30/2012 07:06 AM, Bill Vance wrote: make[1]: *** No rule to make target `crypto/apr_md5.c', needed by `crypto/apr_md5.lo'. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory /usr/local/src/httpd-2.4.2/apr-util-1.3.9+dfsg' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 Hello, It looks like you are trying to build aga

Re: [users@httpd] Should name based virtual hosts work when the ServerName is an IP address?

2012-05-30 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
--On 29 May 2012 16:02:25 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: This was documented feature in 1.3 and 2.0: The complete list of names in the VirtualHost directive are treated just like a ServerAlias (but are not overridden by any ServerAlias statement) if all names resolve to the same address

Re: [users@httpd] Build problem

2012-05-30 Thread Mark Montague
On May 30, 2012 8:06 , Bill Vance wrote: I'm new to the list, so this may allready be addressed somewhere. Basically, I', trying to put the sources for apache2 and php, etc., together, and I seem to be having some heavy wading. Do you have a reason to want to build from source? For example,

[users@httpd] Problem with URL Rewriting

2012-05-30 Thread Jean-Christophe Boggio
Hello, I have a problem with URL Rewriting. I'm trying to transform URLs of the form : http://medecine-et-enfance.net/archives/voir.html?file=J_2005_01_039.pdf to http://medecine-et-enfance.net/showpdf.html?file=J_2005_01_039.pdf I have defined the following in the VirtualHost : Rewrit

[users@httpd] Can't get mod_wl_22 to stop logging.

2012-05-30 Thread eric.berg
I've set Debug to OFF everywhere it occurs, but it's still writing to the logs. Apache 2.2 Anyone have any suggestions for stopping this? Thanks. Eric ___ This e-mail may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise protected

[users@httpd] mod_jk vs. mod_proxy_ajp

2012-05-30 Thread Frank Mancini
anyone have a recommendation and differences? can I get precompiles of mok_jk somewhere for Sun Solaris?

Re: [users@httpd] Can't get mod_wl_22 to stop logging.

2012-05-30 Thread Ishita Kapadiya
have you set is as OFF in - ... If yes and if it's still not working send us httpd.conf (after removing all sensitive information). On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 9:44 AM, wrote: > I’ve set Debug to OFF everywhere it occurs, but it’s still writing to the > logs. > > Apache 2.2 > > Anyone have any

RE: [users@httpd] Can't get mod_wl_22 to stop logging.

2012-05-30 Thread eric.berg
Thanks for your reply, Ishita. All of the Debug statements are set to OFF. I have one major question at this point: Are the mod_wl directives scoped local to the and sections in which they appear? We have many sections that create wl clusters, but the only requests that I have noticed in t

Re: [users@httpd] Segmentation fault error

2012-05-30 Thread Ishita Kapadiya
Thanks Nick. I have compiled Apache for myself both the time and both are 32-bit. The same modules all other instances are using and thus i am not sure what is different with this instance that causing Segmentation fault error. I tried to dig more into it and here is what i got - mdb core > ::sta

Re: [users@httpd] Can't get mod_wl_22 to stop logging.

2012-05-30 Thread Ishita Kapadiya
Hi Eric, yes. mod_wl directives scoped local to the and sections in which they appear. It's good idea to see default configuration for WL plug-in with - “__WebLogicBridgeConfig” (you also need to set DebugConfigInfo ON) and check if Debug is ON by default. in that case you have to explicitly set

RE: [users@httpd] Can't get mod_wl_22 to stop logging.

2012-05-30 Thread eric.berg
Thanks, Ishita. That's very helpful. Do you know where the scoping issue is mentioned in the WL docs, or is it an apache thing? The thing is that every single wl config section has "Debug OFF", and it's still logging to those wl files. When you suggest that logging might be on by default, whe

Re: [users@httpd] Can't get mod_wl_22 to stop logging.

2012-05-30 Thread Ishita Kapadiya
Hi Eric, You can refer http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E12840_01/wls/docs103/plugins/apache.html. consider other two scenarios - 1) there is no other instance on the server than had Debug ON 2) grep the wl log file name in apache config which will provide you clue with that set of config. Thanks On W

Re: [users@httpd] virtual hosts with different JkExtract ssl values

2012-05-30 Thread Charles Richard
Thanks for the help! As silly as this sounds, I thought i had tried the scenario I had above and that it hadn't worked but after I read the documentation you sent, it didn't explicitly specify that JkExtract could not be used in a virtual host so I tried it and it worked! Thanks, Charles On Tue,

[users@httpd] Compiling/Installing httpd 2.4.2 on AIX 6.1 with gcc/g++

2012-05-30 Thread Reimer, George
My browser tells me that "It Works!" but it took a couple days of banging my head against the wall. I encountered the following rough spots and eventually stumbled over their solutions as noted: 1) No libpcre This is a pre-requisite for httpd, I did not have it. I downloaded version 8.3

Re: [users@httpd] Compiling/Installing httpd 2.4.2 on AIX 6.1 with gcc/g++

2012-05-30 Thread Eric Covener
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Reimer, George wrote: > My browser tells me that “It Works!”  but it took a couple days of banging > my head against the wall. I encountered the following rough spots and > eventually stumbled over their solutions as noted: can you share your gcc experience here i

Re: [users@httpd] Should name based virtual hosts work when the ServerName is an IP address?

2012-05-30 Thread Alex Bligh
--On 30 May 2012 14:41:53 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: I worked around this problem by defining fake name in NameVirtualHost and VirtualHost sections # some.na.me maps to 192.168.0.1 NameVirtualHost some.na.me NameVirtualHost 192.168.0.1 # some.na.me is not resolvable from outside,

Re: [users@httpd] Should name based virtual hosts work when the ServerName is an IP address?

2012-05-30 Thread Eric Covener
> Is there anything else I can do, like (e.g.) put the IP address as > a hex constant or something in ? Or disable this rather > annoying feature? I'd suggest opening a bug report that something weird seems to happen with the literal IP address in the

Re: [users@httpd] Segmentation fault error

2012-05-30 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
You didn't dump the offending stack, you dumped the first stack. It's highly unlikely there was a segfault in _read. You need to dump all the thread stacks, and work out the offending one; this is usuallly designated <<< FAULT or some other indication of where the fault occured. On 5/30/2012 10

Re: [users@httpd] Build problem

2012-05-30 Thread Bill Vance
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 08:54:32AM -0400, Mark Montague wrote: >Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 08:54:32 -0400 >From: Mark Montague >Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Build problem > >On May 30, 2012 8:06 , Bill Vance wrote: >>I'm new to the list, so this may allready be >>addressed somewhere. Basically, I', tr

Re: [users@httpd] Segmentation fault error

2012-05-30 Thread Ishita Kapadiya
Thanks William. This is the stack output i got from mdb when core got dumped. Also, when i google "ap_mpm_pod_check" then got to know that there are lots of people who hits Apache bug. Please refer this URL - http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/bugs/414768 Also, i ran pfiles against the

Re: [users@httpd] Build problem

2012-05-30 Thread Bill Vance
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 08:54:32AM -0400, Mark Montague wrote: >Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 08:54:32 -0400 >From: Mark Montague >Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Build problem >However, a much better way, considering the directory path in the >error message below is to go to http://httpd.apache.org/ and do

Re: [users@httpd] Segmentation fault error

2012-05-30 Thread Eric Covener
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Ishita Kapadiya wrote: > Thanks William. This is the stack output i got from mdb when core got > dumped. Also, when i google "ap_mpm_pod_check" then got to know that > there are lots of people who hits Apache bug. It means lots of people post about the first threa

Re: [users@httpd] Build problem

2012-05-30 Thread Mark Montague
On May 30, 2012 17:28 , Bill Vance wrote: Actually I'm running KUbuntu 10.04, Lucid Lunatic, or Lynx, or whatever that stupid name is, on an i386-32 One of the problems here are utils like apt-get, aptitude, and synaptic, etc. So load a fresh KUbuntu system -- at this point, I think you may h

Re: [users@httpd] Segmentation fault error

2012-05-30 Thread Ishita Kapadiya
Hi Eric, could you please let me know the next steps to mitigate Segfault error.. On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Ishita Kapadiya wrote: >> Thanks William. This is the stack output i got from mdb when core got >> dumped. Also, when i googl

Re: [users@httpd] Build problem

2012-05-30 Thread Mark Montague
On May 30, 2012 18:14 , Bill Vance wrote: Well, I tried it, but ./configure died with: checking for tm_gmtoff in struct tm... yes adding "-DAPR_DTRACE_PROVIDER" to CPPFLAGS configure: error: 'DTrace Support in the build system is not complete. Patches Welcome!' Ok, so now what do I do? I

Re: [users@httpd] Build problem

2012-05-30 Thread Stormy
At 02:28 PM 5/30/2012 -0700, Bill Vance wrote: On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 08:54:32AM -0400, Mark Montague wrote: >Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 08:54:32 -0400 >From: Mark Montague >Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Build problem > >On May 30, 2012 8:06 , Bill Vance wrote: >>I'm new to the list, so this may allr

Re: [users@httpd] Build problem

2012-05-30 Thread Bill Vance
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 07:11:51PM -0400, Stormy wrote: >Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 19:11:51 -0400 >From: Stormy >Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Build problem [snip] >Not sure why you need KDE for a server, but... > >Maybe 10.04 is a bit "long in the tooth?" I just rebuilt (Monday >afternoon) from scra

Re: [users@httpd] Should name based virtual hosts work when the ServerName is an IP address?

2012-05-30 Thread Eric Covener
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Eric Covener wrote: >> Is there anything else I can do, like (e.g.) put the IP address as >> a hex constant or something in ? Or disable this rather >> annoying feature? > > I'd suggest opening a bug report that something weird seems to happen > with the literal IP

Re: [users@httpd] Should name based virtual hosts work when the ServerName is an IP address?

2012-05-30 Thread Eric Covener
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Eric Covener wrote: >>> Is there anything else I can do, like (e.g.) put the IP address as >>> a hex constant or something in ? Or disable this rather >>> annoying feature? >> >> I'd suggest opening a bug rep