Re: [users@httpd] mod_proxy_fcgi + PHP-FPM on Apache 2.4 solution?

Thank you, I just realized that earlier, as I thought Location /www/ meant server side. It works, however it passes all traffic through PHP-FPM and gives a "Access denied." message on static files, and does not allow passing variables through the URL with the mod_rewrite method. An alternative rew

Re: [users@httpd] Rewrite Rule

Hi, Thank you and that works fine,but I would still like to know why rewrite rule does not work.May be I am not using the write parameters??. Regards On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Mathijs wrote: > The cleanest way of doing this, doesn't even need mod_rewrite. Just define > two virtualhosts,

Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.4.1, regression, caching forward proxy configuration

On 01.03.2012 17:19, Juergen Daubert wrote: On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 03:38:10PM +, Nick Kew wrote: On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 12:34:22 +0100 Juergen Daubert wrote: Any ideas or suggestions? Set Loglevel to debug, or if necessary high-level trace, for the relevant modules. Thanks for the hint b

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.4.1 third party dependencies

On 02.03.2012 23:28, Andy Wang wrote: I've been following the various changes with Apache 2.4.x (and 2.3.x during development regarding the removal of apr/apr-util and pcre from the Apache source bundle and noted that: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/install.html says nothing about PCRE as a re

[users@httpd] Getting fixes before they are released

I know there are some fixes to 2.4.1 already done - how would I pick those up (rather than going to trunk or 2.5.0 as of today?). There is some mention of a patches directory, but I do not see current info. regards. Same for 2.2.22 Thanks

[users] Re: [users@httpd] Getting fixes before they are released

Michael, On Mar 3, 2012, at 10:47 AM, Michael Felt wrote: > I know there are some fixes to 2.4.1 already done - how would I pick those up > (rather than going to trunk or 2.5.0 as of today?). Fixes to the 2.4 releases appear in the 2.4.x branch as they are backported. Check out http://svn.

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.4.1 third party dependencies

On Mar 2, 2012, at 2:28 PM, Andy Wang wrote: > 've been following the various changes with Apache 2.4.x (and 2.3.x during > development regarding the removal of apr/apr-util and pcre from the Apache > source bundle and noted that: > http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/install.html > > says nothin

Re: [users@httpd] Stable Version of Httpd

[snip] > You will need to rebuild all external modules of course given its a > new major (like php, mod_perl etc) The latest stable of mod_perl (2.0.5) doesn't currently build with 2.4.1. Haven't checked out the trunk. i -- Igor Galić Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883 Mail: i.ga...@brainsware.org U

[users@httpd] apache vs Hiawatha web server

Has anyone here ever tried Hiawatha web server? i need to run only mysql, php and perl in the backend. i am concerned with memory footprint and speed difference between the two servers. personal websites would be holding data, pictures, videos etc. at what kind of web traffic level (for e.g. 5g

[users@httpd] Re: [users] Re: [users@httpd] Getting fixes before they are released

Seems there is a big difference between .../2.4.X and .../2.4.x (in other words, was not finding the .X) (same for 2.2.x, er X) Thanks. On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Sander Temme wrote: > Michael, > > On Mar 3, 2012, at 10:47 AM, Michael Felt wrote: > > > I know there are some fixes to 2.4.1

[users@httpd] getting the svn revision number out of tree.

Hi, When checking out a tree the last line is a "revision number" that has been checked out. Is there a simple way to get that revision number using a script similar to the build/pkg/pkginfo script in the httpd distributions? Michael