Hi All,
I have a nagios server to monitor the remote apache server and automatically
restarting the service if it is detected unreachable. Now, in times of
apache down, I just want to get the processes list or any means that could
help during diagnostic operation. Can anyone recommend any good app
On 05/27/2010 12:42 PM, James Corteciano wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a nagios server to monitor the remote apache server and
> automatically restarting the service if it is detected unreachable.
> Now, in times of apache down, I just want to get the processes list or
> any means that could help dur
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Nasir Zia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> how can i decide to use prefork or worker MPM. Can anyone describe in detail
> and how can i make a server which can handle 2000 users per second. How can
> I optimize the server response. i am using Apache 2.2.15.
>
> Regards
> Nasir
>
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:25 PM, J. Bakshi wrote:
> On 05/27/2010 12:16 PM, J. Bakshi wrote:
>> Hello list,
>>
>> I am trying to achieve a very particular .htaccess redirect arrangement.
>> I have made it worked but halfway :-(
>>
>> I have written a redirect rule as
>>
>> `
>> Re
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:42 PM, James Corteciano
wrote:
> Hi All,
> I have a nagios server to monitor the remote apache server and automatically
> restarting the service if it is detected unreachable. Now, in times of
> apache down, I just want to get the processes list or any means that could
>
On 05/27/2010 01:14 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:25 PM, J. Bakshi wrote:
>
>> On 05/27/2010 12:16 PM, J. Bakshi wrote:
>>
>>> Hello list,
>>>
>>> I am trying to achieve a very particular .htaccess redirect arrangement.
>>> I have made it worked but halfway :-
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:45 PM, J. Bakshi wrote:
> On 05/27/2010 01:14 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
>> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:25 PM, J. Bakshi wrote:
>>
>>> On 05/27/2010 12:16 PM, J. Bakshi wrote:
>>>
Hello list,
I am trying to achieve a very particular .htaccess redirect a
On 05/27/2010 01:59 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> I assume that you want to redirect abcd.mydomain.com to
> www.mydomain.com/?domain=abcd.mydomain.com
> Considering that scenario and limiting subdomains only to
> mydomain.com, the following rule works (I've tested them on my
> server):
>
> Rewri
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:50 AM, J. Bakshi wrote:
> On 05/27/2010 01:59 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
>> I assume that you want to redirect abcd.mydomain.com to
>> www.mydomain.com/?domain=abcd.mydomain.com
>> Considering that scenario and limiting subdomains only to
>> mydomain.com, the followin
On 05/27/2010 02:33 PM, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:50 AM, J. Bakshi wrote:
>
>> On 05/27/2010 01:59 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
>>
>>> I assume that you want to redirect abcd.mydomain.com to
>>> www.mydomain.com/?domain=abcd.mydomain.com
>>> Considering that scenario a
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:23 AM, J. Bakshi wrote:
>
> Yes, I post here frequently and I get some really nice solution from
> this list. IS it an offense ?
>
>
You don't ever look to see what your solution could be, by using the
resources provided - eg the excellent manual. You simply ask your
o
On 05/27/2010 02:59 PM, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:23 AM, J. Bakshi wrote:
>
>> Yes, I post here frequently and I get some really nice solution from
>> this list. IS it an offense ?
>>
>>
>>
> You don't ever look to see what your solution could be, by using the
> resour
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:42 AM, J. Bakshi wrote:
> On 05/27/2010 02:59 PM, Tom Evans wrote:
>> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:23 AM, J. Bakshi wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, I post here frequently and I get some really nice solution from
>>> this list. IS it an offense ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> You don't ever look to
J Greenlees wrote:
>personally, I would consider a permanent redirect to 127.0.0.1 for all
but your one excepted case on access of the default virtual host.
>their bots will screw their own server that way. ;)
Sorry to bring you the bad news, Jaqui, but bots don't respect
redirection. I suspe
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:42 AM, J. Bakshi wrote:
>> On 05/27/2010 02:59 PM, Tom Evans wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:23 AM, J. Bakshi wrote:
>>>
Yes, I post here frequently and I get some really nice solution from
this list.
On 05/27/2010 05:22 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> Guys stop fighting. The problem has been solved. That's all. (.)
>
>
I have already kept myself silence Nilesh. Thanks for your kind clues
and also thanks to Tom as he has pointed out some really good links for me.
Wish you all a nice time.
The sane sultion would be to setup a default host (first vhost == default)
and just deny all access to it.
You'll still get hit but all requests without a hostname get denied.
~Jorge
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Peter Horn wrote:
> J Greenlees wrote:
>
> >personally, I would consider a pe
Hello,
I'm not entirely sure what your problem is. There is not a single
question in your mail.
What is your problem? What are you trying to achieve? What are you
getting in stead?
Krist
--
krist.vanbes...@gmail.com
kr...@vanbesien.org
Bremgarten b. Bern, Switzerland
--
A: It reverses the nor
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Krist van Besien
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm not entirely sure what your problem is. There is not a single
> question in your mail.
>
> What is your problem? What are you trying to achieve? What are you
> getting in stead?
+1 -- I punched out before reading the entire
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Krist van Besien
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm not entirely sure what your problem is. There is not a single
>> question in your mail.
>>
>> What is your problem? What are you trying to achieve? What are you
>>
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 5:36 AM, Igor Cicimov wrote:
> Loading the dav module twice in your config?
I can confirm the problem is not caused by the webdav module. I have
disabled it (it wasn't used) and just got the same problem. Here's the
log:
[Thu May 27 15:30:30 2010] [notice] Graceful restar
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Raphael Bauduin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With an apache 2.2 running on FreeBSD
which level of Apache? (2.2.9 had a change in this area of processing)
which level of FreeBSD?
>, I occasionally get a
> problem
> with a g
I don't have an answer for you, but here are a few troubleshooting tips I
have found helpful.
If you can make it happen pretty often, you could try doing an
strace/truss/ktrace (I think it's ktrace on BSD) of the process to see what
system calls it's making and exactly which is failing. You could
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Chen Chien-Yu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I encountered a problem after upgrading Apache to 2.2.15.
> The client will be stuck and load infinitely via the HTTP protocol, but it
> worked correctly in 2.0.55 before I upgraded.
what OS?
you probably need to get a syscall trace
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for your reply.
My OS is Linux with kernel 2.6.x.
Actually, as your suggest, I've been tracing the Apache source code for a
couple of days.
I'm new to the Apache, seems that something wrong between GNU CGI and
mod_cgi, not sure. But I might give up the upgrading due to the limited
I am using Fedora 10 httpd. By default, I can http:// and https:// to the
host.
Now I want to
1. disable http:// ie disable port 80 and keep https:// or port 443 only.
I am still using the default DocumentRoot /var/www/html/.
I am confused if I should use Listen 443 or Listen x.x.x.x:443 or S
Hi,
I'm not familiar with the bucket, brigade at all.
It seems that the chunk will be sent via bucket brigade.
I found the stuck happen when the length of the bucket is "0" and the next
length of the bucket is "5" (0\r\n\r\n, is this the last chunk?).
Why isn't the last chunk inserted in the buck
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 8:29 AM, gping wrote:
>
> I am using Fedora 10 httpd. By default, I can http:// and https:// to the
> host.
> Now I want to
>
> 1. disable http:// ie disable port 80 and keep https:// or port 443 only.
> I am still using the default DocumentRoot /var/www/html/.
> I am con
On 5/27/2010 10:44 PM, Chen Chien-Yu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not familiar with the bucket, brigade at all.
> It seems that the chunk will be sent via bucket brigade.
> I found the stuck happen when the length of the bucket is "0" and the
> next length of the bucket is "5" (0\r\n\r\n, is this the last
Thanks for your quick reply.
I was focusing on httpd.conf. And now i try to modify ssl.conf.
Q: how to make the web site https:// only?
If I simply hash out Listen 80, it still responses.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/install-certificate-on-httpd-tp28702259p28702534.
Hi William,
Refer to your words, so it's a bug in the bucket brigade mechanism? Should I
report it to the Apache bug system?
The two buckets are processed in the ap_core_output_filter(), and in the
case of EOS bucket (APR_BUCKET_IS_EOS is true)
That's why, the specific two buckets aren't sent out
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 9:33 AM, gping wrote:
>
> Thanks for your quick reply.
> I was focusing on httpd.conf. And now i try to modify ssl.conf.
> Q: how to make the web site https:// only?
> If I simply hash out Listen 80, it still responses.
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 9:33 AM, gping wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for your quick reply.
>> I was focusing on httpd.conf. And now i try to modify ssl.conf.
>> Q: how to make the web site https:// only?
>> If I simply hash out Listen 80, it sti
On 5/27/2010 11:04 PM, Chen Chien-Yu wrote:
> Hi William,
>
> Refer to your words, so it's a bug in the bucket brigade mechanism?
> Should I report it to the Apache bug system?
> The two buckets are processed in the ap_core_output_filter(), and in the
> case of EOS bucket (APR_BUCKET_IS_EOS is tru
On 5/26/2010 8:24 AM, Chen Chien-Yu wrote:
>
> It seems that some packets are queued in the Apache, ..?!
> I describe the process as below,
> 1. Client send http request to the server, http://myhost/web.cgi, the
> cgi is implemented in GNU CGI which has been dead since 2002.
If the CGI closes th
Hi William,
I reckon it should be mod_cgi, the CGI library I use is called "GNU CGI
Library in C, v0.9.5" which has been maintained for many years.
The function below is the way the CGI init and open the stream.
gcgiReturnType
initCgi( )
{
*/* Dup stdout to gcgiOut */*
*gcgifd = dup(file
Hi William,
I've ever mentioned if I comment out the "Listen 443" and leave only the
"Listen 80", the client can get the page without problem via HTTP. (In this
successful case, I also see the two 0 and 5 length bucket, don't know why
they are sent out even reach the EOS)
The problem only exists
Hi,
These are the modules in my Apache
r...@~# /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -l | more
Compiled in modules:
core.c
mod_authn_file.c
mod_authn_default.c
mod_authz_host.c
mod_authz_groupfile.c
mod_authz_user.c
mod_authz_default.c
mod_auth_basic.c
mod_include.c
mod_filter.c
mod_l
Jorge wrote:
>The sane sultion would be to setup a default host (first vhost ==
default) and just deny all access to it.
>You'll still get hit but all requests without a hostname get denied.
Jorge,
You may have missed my original post a few days ago (95182). I know many
ways to deny access; w
On 28 May 2010, at 06:23, Chen Chien-Yu wrote:
> Hi William,
>
> I reckon it should be mod_cgi, the CGI library I use is called "GNU CGI
> Library in C, v0.9.5" which has been maintained for many years.
>
> The function below is the way the CGI init and open the stream.
>
> gcgiReturnType
>
Hi Nick,
I have no idea why duplicate the stdout, and seems that no one deals with
the stream closing in the library.
Please have a look at the main source code,
http://www.sfr-fresh.com/unix/www/gcgi-0.9.5.tar.gz:a/libgcgi.a-0.9.5/src/gcgi.c
I guess this is the official website of this library,
41 matches
Mail list logo
