I had the same issue. I had a stray php5ts.dll file in my system32 folder
from a previous install.
Destone Solutions Ltd. wrote:
>
> Hey folks,
>
> We have a Windows Server 2003 SP2 with Intel Core 2 Duo - 2.66 GHz
> processor and 4 GB RAM.
>
> We are solely using PHP / MySQL and for some r
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Sheryl wrote:
>
>>> What benefit does this give you over running VirtualHost?
>>>
>>
>> (I wouldn't set up a second instance like suggested, but..)
>
> Curious about why not...
>
> BTW, my example was a little simplified. In practice we actually make a
> link "bas
Hi guys,
I am sorry if this is such a newbie question!
I was diagnosing an un-related issue on my web-server and had to list
processes to see which PID needed to be killed. I noticed that there
were several entries for the "http2-prefork" process ...
[start]
wwwrun8786 0.0 0.5 88452
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Richard Peacock
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I am sorry if this is such a newbie question!
>
>
>
> I was diagnosing an un-related issue on my web-server and had to list
> processes to see which PID needed to be killed. I noticed that there were
> several entries for the
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Richard Peacock <
richard.peac...@minorplanet.com> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I am sorry if this is such a newbie question!
>
>
>
> I was diagnosing an un-related issue on my web-server and had to list
> processes to see which PID needed to be killed. I noticed that t
On Feb 26, 2010, at 8:31 AM, Richard Peacock wrote:
> I was diagnosing an un-related issue on my web-server and had to list
> processes to see which PID needed to be killed. I noticed that there were
> several entries for the “http2-prefork” process …
>
> I mean, it’s not a huge problem or a
On Feb 26, 2010, at 8:35 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> Prefork is always like that. It will spawn a process for each request.
Not exactly. It spawns processes ahead of time, and then manages the process
pool within specified parameters. Saying that it spawns a process for each
request somew
Hi All,
I'd like to ask you some help with apache configuration for my goal.
I have two different server instances running on the same box and on
different ports. For instance:
http://my.domain.com:8080/appA
http://my.domain.com:9090/appB
are the URLs at the moment i'm using.
Actually I want
From: Stefano Nichele
> Actually I want to setup a proxy in order to have:
> http://appA.domain.com (instead of http://my.domain.com:8080/appA)
> http://appB.domain.com (instead of http://my.domain.com:9090/appB)
> What's the best way to obtain this ?
Virtual Hosts...?
http://httpd.apache.org
On Feb 26, 2010, at 8:42 AM, Stefano Nichele wrote:
> Hi All,
> I'd like to ask you some help with apache configuration for my goal.
>
> I have two different server instances running on the same box and on
> different ports. For instance:
>
> http://my.domain.com:8080/appA
> http://my.domain.c
I'm still getting the following issue and I've not received any pointers -
am I the only one experiencing the problem?
On 10 February 2010 16:27, Colin Kirkham wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got an issue on Windows 2003 64 bit (virtualized) when I enable a
> webdav area. The symptom being a delay of 30 se
Hi all,
I have configured my WAP site as a virtual host in Apache. My WAP site does
not have a Favicon and I don't want to use it either. Microbrowsers are
complaining about the favicon and are getting a 404 error from my tomcat web
server, which is behind Apache server.
Please suggest how I can
This seems to be something that's been around for a while, but I
haven't been able to find anything conclusive saying that it's
supposed to work this way:
I'm using Apache 2.2 as a forward proxy, aiming to cache all responses.
I've set CacheDefaultExpire to 86400 (1 day), so any requests that
don
On Feb 26, 2010, at 9:44 AM, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> I have configured my WAP site as a virtual host in Apache. My WAP site does
> not have a Favicon and I don't want to use it either. Microbrowsers are
> complaining about the favicon and are getting a 404 error from my tomcat web
> server, which is
Hi,
I have two domains, example.net and example.com
*.example.net & *.example.com point to the server's IP (Wildcard CNAME).
Now only some subdomains like www, img, etc. are defined on both domains.
I want to catch all other subdomains not configured and raise a 404 error.
How to ?
--
Nilesh
On Feb 26, 2010, at 11:57 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have two domains, example.net and example.com
>
> *.example.net & *.example.com point to the server's IP (Wildcard CNAME).
>
> Now only some subdomains like www, img, etc. are defined on both domains.
>
> I want to catch all
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have two domains, example.net and example.com
>
> *.example.net & *.example.com point to the server's IP (Wildcard CNAME).
>
> Now only some subdomains like www, img, etc. are defined on both domains.
>
> I want to catch all o
On 02/26/2010 12:12 PM, Tom Evans wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
Hi,
I have two domains, example.net and example.com
*.example.net& *.example.com point to the server's IP (Wildcard CNAME).
Now only some subdomains like www, img, etc. are defined on both
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have two domains, example.net and example.com
> >
> > *.example.net & *.example.com point to the server's IP (Wildcard CNAME).
> >
> > Now only some subdomains like
Hi, all
How many https virtual hosts supported under Apache v2.0.59? I can't test with
v2.2.14 since the bug I just filed.
On my Solaris 10, Apache 2.0.59 reverse proxy server, I have a https virtual
host defined with a real certificate from a CA and forward https traffic to a
backend server
What order does Apache write the log entries?
I'm assuming that if Apache serves 100 responses all in the same time second
window (100 responses per second) I suppose it's going to write them in the
order the response happened and not scramble them up willy-nilly. In other
words, although there
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Alf Eaton wrote:
> This seems to be something that's been around for a while, but I
> haven't been able to find anything conclusive saying that it's
> supposed to work this way:
>
> I'm using Apache 2.2 as a forward proxy, aiming to cache all responses.
>
> I've s
22 matches
Mail list logo
