Glad to have ben of some help, and thanks for sharing your results.
It's always fun to deal with an interesting issue and cooperating poster.
As a matter of fact, the result of your investigation will be quite
helpful for me too. Although I'm using mod_jk and not mod_proxy, I'm
quite sure that
Hi,
I need some help in migrating our existing code from RHEL4 to centOS 4.2.
We use apache configured as a proxy server and ,we have an out filter
module registered with apache 2.2.4, where we gets the page content and
do some processing based on the content.
Everything worked fine in RHEL4 but w
Hi,
We have Apache Web server which is to be linked to 2 jboss instances on the
same server.
We have made the entries in workers.properties file but what changes need to
be done in Jboss so that both instances are picked up by Apache load
balancer?
I tried changing Connector port="8009" to 8007 f
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 16:12 +0530, gmanohar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need some help in migrating our existing code from RHEL4 to centOS 4.2.
> We use apache configured as a proxy server and ,we have an out filter
> module registered with apache 2.2.4, where we gets the page content and
> do some process
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 04:34 -0700, nilesh p wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have Apache Web server which is to be linked to 2 jboss instances on the
> same server.
> We have made the entries in workers.properties file but what changes need to
> be done in Jboss so that both instances are picked up by Apache l
:)
Its like this,
My workers.properties file is as below
worker.list=loadbalancer
worker.loadbalancer.type=lb
#worker.loadbalancer.balance_workers=server1,server2,server3
worker.loadbalancer.balance_workers=server2,server3,server4,server5
worker.loadbalancer.sticky_session=true
# Set propert
Hi.
The configuration you provide below does not seem to make much sense.
Why do you have 2 workers (4 and 5), connecting to the /same/ back-end
(IP4) on the same port (8009) ?
No wonder something is getting confused.
I have not cross-checked the rest, but generally speaking :
1 "worker", port
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 06:12 -0700, nilesh p wrote:
> :)
> Its like this,
>
> My workers.properties file is as below
>
> worker.list=loadbalancer
>
>
> worker.loadbalancer.type=lb
> #worker.loadbalancer.balance_workers=server1,server2,server3
> worker.loadbalancer.balance_workers=server2,server
Nilesh,
The two JBoss instances need to be on different ports in case they are
running on the same physical server with one IP address. Your
workers.properties file has a discrepancy regarding the server4 and server5
workers.
Before working on Apache tomcat connector configuration, try running th
I see that apache 2.2.11 has been released but how do I find out if
that's a stable release and something I can consider deploying in
production?
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:17 PM, William A. Rowe,
Jr. wrote:
> Mohit Anchlia wrote:
>> We are using Apache 2.2. How can I find which one is most recent
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 07:57 -0700, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> I see that apache 2.2.11 has been released but how do I find out if
> that's a stable release and something I can consider deploying in
> production?
All releases of apache are stable releases; that is the definition of a
release. The apach
Thanks. So if I already have some earlier version of 2.2 installed
then does the apache install upgrades by applying patch or is it a new
installation?
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 07:57 -0700, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
>> I see that apache 2.2.11 has been r
Sushant Gulati wrote:
...
This list does
not allow discussions about Jboss configuration.
It is not that the list does not /allow/ discussions about JBoss.
It is that JBoss is another software product, for which people here are
probably not competent. And they know it, so they do not want to
Hey Andre,
Thanks a lot for your suggestions.
Nilesh,
Always, please check the official links like the one's suggested by Andre.
They are always the best place to start. Hope you can figure out the error
in the configuration, which I am sure would be minor.
Otherwise we are all here to help each
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 08:24 -0700, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> Thanks. So if I already have some earlier version of 2.2 installed
> then does the apache install upgrades by applying patch or is it a new
> installation?
No, if you are just downloading the tarball from httpd.apache.org, then
it is a new
Hi All,
I am using Apache 2.2.11 on windows 2003 server. I am noticing that the
memory used by httpd.exe is keep on increasing and one point of time, ( I
saw it went up to 1.8GB) the child process got terminated and span a new
process. Around 2 minutes, Apache won't respond and then It functions
Tom Evans wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 07:57 -0700, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
>> I see that apache 2.2.11 has been released but how do I find out if
>> that's a stable release and something I can consider deploying in
>> production?
>
> All releases of apache are stable releases; that is the definiti
Thanks. So I am little confused if I should wait for a while for
Apache 3.0 or take this as a stable release and upgrade from Apache
2.2.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:33 PM, William A. Rowe,
Jr. wrote:
> Tom Evans wrote:
>> On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 07:57 -0700, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
>>> I see that apach
Thank you Andrew and Tom,
Thank you for your insightful replies. These have definitely helped me in
understanding the major issues.
At this moment I can not understand "How a 'Connecton' is passed from parent
process to child process."
My understanding is
"a connection is a combination of (IP
Good afternoon,
I run a variety of programs and services that present information or
configuration via a web interface (tivowebplus, mlnet, sabnzbd,
transmission, etc). Rather than every program presenting its own web
server on a different port or even a different host (6886 for Vuze,
909
Where can I get Apache that runs on 64bit linux? Is it available somewhere?
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> Thanks. So I am little confused if I should wait for a while for
> Apache 3.0 or take this as a stable release and upgrade from Apache
> 2.2.
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009
> -Original Message-
> From: Mohit Anchlia [mailto:mohitanch...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 11 June, 2009 14:17
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Stable Release of Apache
>
> Where can I get Apache that runs on 64bit linux? Is it
> available somewhere?
>
Yes.
I have been trying to determine the proper configuration for a problem
unsuccessfully. I have tried many online resources, but haven't been
able to put the lid on this problem.
My scenario:
One server is running Apache in a dmz. Another server is running Apache
inside a firewall, and is con
23 matches
Mail list logo
