> -Original Message-
> From: David P. Donahue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Montag, 13. März 2006 17:14
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SSL And Virtual Hosts
>
>
> The most we're talking about here is a username/password for
> forums/ftp/webmail. I def
Hello all,
I am a newbie in apache, less than 2 weeks of experience. I am
trying to protect one of my directory in the web server with Basic
authentication. I am using Gentoo Linux with apache-2.0.55. I see that
auth_module is loaded as a Module. I have configured the Virtual Host
like this. Th
> -Original Message-
> From: Manilal K M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Dienstag, 14. März 2006 09:55
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Basic Authentication not working in
> Gentoo Linux
>
> Hello all,
>I am a newbie in apache, less than 2 weeks of experien
On 14/03/06, Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Manilal K M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Dienstag, 14. März 2006 09:55
> > To: users@httpd.apache.org
> > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Basic Authentication not working in
> > Gentoo Linux
> >
> > Hello
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 08:55, Manilal K M wrote:
>
So you're "Wraith Enterprises" of Texas?
--
Nick Kew
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html
> -Original Message-
> From: Manilal K M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Dienstag, 14. März 2006 11:06
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Basic Authentication not working
> in Gentoo Linux
>
>I have comment out the directive _AllowOverride AuthConfig_ as
On 14/03/06, Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 March 2006 08:55, Manilal K M wrote:
>
> >
>
> So you're "Wraith Enterprises" of Texas?
I didn't got you :) I just put a arbitrary hostname.
On 14/03/06, Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Manilal K M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Dienstag, 14. März 2006 11:06
> > To: users@httpd.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Basic Authentication not working
> > in Gentoo Linux
> >
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Manilal K M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Dienstag, 14. März 2006 12:18
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Basic Authentication not working
> in Gentoo Linux
>
> There was no other "AuthConfig",
AuthConfig is the argument to t
Another point:
Are you sure you are accessing the resource via this VH? I notice it's a
cgi-bin directory... Is there another VH container that could be allowing
access via a ScriptAlias or something?
The point I'm making is that your access control is only valid in the scope of
BTW - I gu
On 14/03/06, Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another point:
>
> Are you sure you are accessing the resource via this VH? I notice it's a
> cgi-bin directory... Is there another VH container that could be allowing
> access via a ScriptAlias or something?
There is no other virtual host. But
Hallo,
we are using apache 2.2.0 with php 5.1.1 (including access to Oracle
database) on an solaris 10 machine. We noticed, that always a couple of
request to the php pages lead to segmentation faults as we verified in the
error log. A reload of the requested page works often without any problem.
I have tried with a fresh new Directory tag within the DocumentRoot.
The follwoing configuration was added
Options FollowSymLinks
Options +ExecCGI
AuthName "E-mail login:"
AuthType Basic
AuthUserFile /usr/local/bp/htpasswd
Require user manilal
> -Original Message-
> From: Manilal K M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Dienstag, 14. März 2006 12:46
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Basic Authentication not working
> in Gentoo Linux
>
> On 14/03/06, Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Another poi
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:58, Harald Falkenberg wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> we are using apache 2.2.0 with php 5.1.1 (including access to Oracle
> database) on an solaris 10 machine. We noticed, that always a couple of
> request to the php pages lead to segmentation faults as we verified in the
> error l
On 14/03/06, Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Manilal K M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Dienstag, 14. März 2006 12:46
> > To: users@httpd.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Basic Authentication not working
> > in Gentoo Linux
> >
> > On
Hi
> I am pulling my hair out with this. I have a single public IP and already
> have a web server redirected on the firewall from the external IP to the
> private IP of 10.5.36.5. Now I need to enable another box (10.5.36.6)
> running on port 80 to be accessible from the outside.
10.5.36.6 is a
Title: Reverse proxy with response update
Hi all,
I'm trying to have a special architecture I'm managing with my own java application for now.
The current flow is :
1. Send a request to a reverse proxy server (java servlet on tomcat), for example : http://myreverseproxy/GO_TO_www.another
Hi everyone,I am using a monitoring tool -nagios- that is running through a web interface where you can configure things. I really want avoid people from being able to log to that server or to know wich is coming in and out of the traffic. I am actually using authentication with .htaccess file. Is
That is correct. My understanding is that Cisco Pix 505 can't do the port
forwarding so that is the reason why I was looking on doing this.
Thanks
--
Paul Aviles
-- Original Message ---
From: "Gaël Lams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:14
yes SSL would be your best bet, with .htaccess your passwords would be travelling in plain text, so go for SSL...
Kishore Jalleda
On 3/14/06, Toto Capuccino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi everyone,I am using a monitoring tool -nagios- that is running through a web interface where you can config
Hallo Nick,
thank you for the hint. We get no core files although ulimit is set to
unlimited for it. Does mod_backtrace still helps to analyze the problem
yet?
If so, what will mod_backtrace generate?
regards
Harald
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:58
Hi,
I want to use pwauth for authentication on my apache.
I downloaded pwauth-2.3.2.tar.gz and compiled it.
Than I installed it in /usr/local/bin and "suid root" it (chmod +s pwauth)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/bin]# ll pwauth
-rwsr-sr-x1 root root16517 Mar 14 17:06 pwa
You oughta look into mod-security. It allows you to do
some real neat stuff as far as "securing a webserver"
is concerned.
--- Kishore Jalleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yes SSL would be your best bet, with .htaccess your
> passwords would be
> travelling in plain text, so go for SSL...
>
> Ki
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone knew whether there is a Win32 port of Apache 2.2
yet? If so where could I get it? Thanks.
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/
I have noticed that some webhosts add a “Hosted by
BlahBlah.com” at the bottom of every page that they host.
I currently have 3 websites (vhosts) based on my apache
server: mine and 2 others (www.cpcomputers.co.uk
www.simsony.co.uk and www.sexybotch.co.uk).
Is there a way of tagging
> Actually, the reason you use a DMZ is because if a vulnerability is
> found in you web server and you box gets taken over, the hacker doesn't
> have access to your entire LAN, only stuff that is sitting in your DMZ
> (DeMilitarised Zone). You still firewall your DMZ, and usually have a
> 2nd fire
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 23:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have noticed that some webhosts add a "Hosted by BlahBlah.com" at the
> bottom of every page that they host.
Commonly done by totally messing with the HTML and relying
on error correction in browsers.
Also possible without damaging mark
Hello, everyone (sorry for the slightly lengthy post)!
I am very interested in learning how to configure Apache's HTTPd in a
style similar to what most large web hosts use, minus anything that
would entirely over-complicate my slightly small setup (I only have a
handful of domains hosted). I am no
Trying a mid-week repost... Seems to me it would be beneficial to be able
to do reverse proxying with mod_rewrite without adding specific
ProxyPassReverse directives.
Atle
-
Flying Crocodile Inc, Unix Systems Administrator
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Atle Veka wrote:
> Hi, I have run into a snag with
30 matches
Mail list logo
