Hello,
The configuration of virtual host https://login is the same:
Listen ip-address:443
ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ServerName webserver
ProxyPass / http://login-internal/
ProxyPassReverse / http://login-internal/
SSLEngine on
SSLCertificateFile /etc/httpd/conf/ssl.
Hello everybody,
I use httpd 2.0.51 together with PHP5 module.
Httpd is started as root. The child processes are then started less
privileged (User, Group). When I run a PHP script that executes a
program on the server, this program would like to access data in the
users home directory. To get th
I'm using the standard gcc that comes with freebsd:
# gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.4.2 [FreeBSD] 20040728
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: "Boyle Owen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, June 23,
OK Here is the deal: Your rewriterule is unnecessary. That's probably what
caused the 302.
What your rewriterule does is to send a redirect to https://webserver/ in
response to a request for the root path https://webserver/ (or a redirect to
https://login/ in response to a request for the root
* Gustavo A. Baratto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [0632 01:32]:
> Does anybody know what is this error all about?
>
> I got the same error in all combinations of these:
> - freebsd 5.3 and 5.4.
> - apache 2.0.53 and 2.0.54
> - freebsd make and gmake
Why don't you just use the ports tree?
http://www.free
Ok I made a mistake in the initial question
When someone goes to https://webserver it has to be redirected to
http://webserver-internal/dealer/start
You were right on https://login it has no subdirectory redirect and this works
without the rewrite...
I got the following 302 found error from th
HTTP 302 is not an error: it is a redirection. The thing which is wrong with
that is the Location header which makes a reference to a server which is not
known to the clients: webserver-internal. In other words, the backend server
tells the browser to make a request for
http://webserver-interna
Hi,
I would like to use mod_rewrite to overwrite the environment variable
REMOTE_ADDR with the value of HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR because I am using Apache
2 in a reverse / forward proxy scenario where the original IP address of the
client is not passed on to the internal Apache server:
Inet -> Ser
Hi,
I've been getting errors like these for a long time and was hoping someone
could suggest the cause, and possibly the cure:
[Fri Jun 24 08:23:02 2005] [error] [client 192.168.0.1] File does not
exist: /usr/local/apache/htdocs/look
[Fri Jun 24 08:23:03 2005] [error] [client 192.168.0.1] Fil
> -Original Message-
> From: Marty Landman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Freitag, 24. Juni 2005 14:48
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Samba share related 404's
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been getting errors like these for a long time and was
> hoping someone
> cou
On 6/24/05, Werner Schalk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to use mod_rewrite to overwrite the environment variable
> REMOTE_ADDR with the value of HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR because I am using Apache
> 2 in a reverse / forward proxy scenario where the original IP address of the
> clien
Thanks
The ProxyPassReverse was the issue... It works
Greetings,
Herwarth
-Original Message-
From: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 13:31
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2.0 as reverse proxy using mod_
Hi,
I would like to know whether Apache when used as Reverse Proxy server
has scripting option
so that it would redirect requests to a web server (which is down due to
some reason) to another backup web server.
If so, can you please tell me the version
of Apache where this is supported and a
I don't know if Apache has such a module, but I think it can be done by
running a script at cron that tests someway your server is up. If it is
not, the script might change the configuration file regarding that
server and reload Apache.
That's a workaround, not an homologated functionality, but
Hi,
well apologies for bringing this issue up again but none of the suggested
solutions actually does work. I tried the following output filter:
ExtFilterDefine proxy_hack mode=output intype=text/html outtype=text/html
cmd="/bin/sed 's/HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR/REMOTE_ADDR/g'"
Enabling this output
On 6/24/05, Werner Schalk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> well apologies for bringing this issue up again but none of the suggested
> solutions actually does work.
I'm not sure how many ways I can say this: There is no way to do what
you want with the included apache modules, and I don't kno
Hi Joshua,
thanks for your help. In your last email you agreed upon the suggestions David
Adams had (e.g. using sed a an output filter). I have tried this and it does
not work.
Thanks anyway.
All the best & bye,
Werner.
-
The
On 6/24/05, Werner Schalk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Joshua,
>
> thanks for your help. In your last email you agreed upon the suggestions David
> Adams had (e.g. using sed a an output filter). I have tried this and it does
> not work.
Now I understand your confusion. His suggestion was to p
Werner Schalk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> well apologies for bringing this issue up again but none of the suggested
> solutions actually does work. I tried the following output filter:
Why do you need to solve it exactly this way? Can't you instruct your
code or your Apache to simply
Hi,
well of course I could use HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR instead of REMOTE_ADDR in all
my scripts but the problem is that I have some customers and their scripts
are relying on REMOTE_ADDR so I don't want to ask them to change their
scripts...
Thanks.
Bye,
Werner
-
Hi,
just a quick follow-up:
Thanks to Thomas Eibner, it got it working:
> I believe this module does it already:
> http://stderr.net/apache/rpaf/
Yeah!
All the best and thanks again,
Werner.
-
The official User-To-User suppor
Werner Schalk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> well of course I could use HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR instead of REMOTE_ADDR in all
> my scripts but the problem is that I have some customers and their scripts
> are relying on REMOTE_ADDR so I don't want to ask them to change their
> scripts...
A
Pardon my newbie question.
I have Mandrake installation with the default Apache 1.3.27
server installed. I want to be able to have some websites that
should support SSL. How do I do about doing that?
What are the advantages or differences between OpenSSL
and ModSSL? Or am I taking about Apples an
Thanks for the hint, but although I do use ports for most things, I found
that for apache and php the ports dont give me as much flexibility. And
particularly the apache port is much more difficult to use than a simple
"./configure --tons --of --args ;make; make install"... I actually tried to
On 6/24/05, Henry Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pardon my newbie question.
>
> I have Mandrake installation with the default Apache 1.3.27
> server installed. I want to be able to have some websites that
> should support SSL. How do I do about doing that?
> What are the advantages or differe
Is the client making typos when trying to get to the samba share?
I.e. typing "blah.blah.com/share" instead of \\blah.blah.com\share?
-Original Message-
From: Boyle Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 8:54 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTEC
Hey all,
I have setup apache 1.3.33 on Solaris 9 in a chroot environment and just
wanted to ask a simple question. If there is a /proc directory in the jail
should the apache processes be in the real root /proc directory or in the
jail /proc directory. This is the first time I have ever setup a
Stephen Shirley said:
> Morning,
> I want to use mod_auth for apache2 to restrict access to a directory on
> a website. I also want to use mod_rewrite to force such authentication
> to be over https.
One way to do this: use a RedirectPermanent to the https-site in the
http-vhost, and put the
> We now see the need to move the non-secure site to it's own server. So I
> need apache to redirect all the non-secure traffic from the old server to
> the new server, and all the secure traffic from the new server to the old
> server. I have accomplished the non-secure traffic of the old server
Gustavo A. Baratto said:
> I'm using the standard gcc that comes with freebsd:
Are you sure?
>>> gmake[4]: Entering directory
>>> `/home/admin2/src/httpd-2.0.54/server/mpm/prefork'
>>> /home/admin2/src/httpd-2.0.54/srclib/apr/libtool --silent
>>> --mode=compile
>>> cc -g -O2-D_REENTRANT -D_T
> It would be nice to have Apache reload proxy rules at regular
> (configurable) intervals w/o the need to bounce the webserver.
apachectl graceful in the crontab?
> Another thing, I desire in mod_proxy is the ability to specify a Failover
> backend (remote) host, in case one host does not respon
Not really. They are the same:
# md5 /usr/bin/cc
MD5 (/usr/bin/cc) = 13df95e5e0f1dbf3fc538e83b01dc1c2
# md5 /usr/bin/gcc
MD5 (/usr/bin/gcc) = 13df95e5e0f1dbf3fc538e83b01dc1c2
Even if I add CC=gcc in the environment, I get the same error.
- Original Message -
From: "Joost de Heer" <[
Hello,
I'm running apache 2.0.46 on RHEL AS3 and I have some image files that are
over the 2gig file size limit, is there anything I can do to increase this
to 4 or more gigs?
Thanks,
- Charles
-
The official User-To-User suppo
Hi,
I'm using mod_rewrite to send .html files as application/xhtml+xml for
agents that say they accept it, and text/html for all others, using
mod_rewrite.
At the moment I simply have a .htaccess file with
RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} \.html$
RewriteCond %{HTTP_ACCEPT
I think this was discussed about 6 months back. If I recall you need to
first make sure the filesystem can support files larger than 2gb. I
think this was the problem that they had.
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Heizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005
Thanks Joost,
I am not so confident about "apachectl -k graceful". I was actually
referring to something within the Apache runtime. The parent process polls
the config files or a file with just proxy rules for changes and
communicates it to the child processes.
But since you have mentioned it,
I believe it is the current version (2.0x) limitation
You may want to check this out:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.1/new_features_2_2.html
New Features in Apache 2.1/2.2
--
Large File Support
httpd is now built with support for files larger than
"Gold, Samuel (Contractor)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hey all,
>
> I have setup apache 1.3.33 on Solaris 9 in a chroot environment and just
> wanted to ask a simple question. If there is a /proc directory in the jail
> should the apache processes be in the real root /proc directory or in the
38 matches
Mail list logo