So we're likely dealing with mod_security overriding the response. I
haven't tinkered with that module in some time to give you a definitive
answer.
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 11:49 AM Marc wrote:
> >
> > What is returning the 500 response here? Is php/python/perl involved?
>
> No, I think this mod
>
> What is returning the 500 response here? Is php/python/perl involved?
No, I think this mod_security is generating this
> As for the scrapers, you are absolutely wasting your time customizing the
> response. I would just return a 403, actually.
I think you might be right. I did not expect to
What is returning the 500 response here? Is php/python/perl involved?
As for the scrapers, you are absolutely wasting your time customizing the
response. I would just return a 403, actually.
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 11:37 AM Marc wrote:
>
> > See the ErrorDocument directive.
>
> It does not seem
> See the ErrorDocument directive.
It does not seem to work. It looks like this config is skipped and the error is
loaded directly from the httpd binary.
ErrorDocument 500 /406.html
> Now, why is that response not suitable? And why would you respond with a
> 200 for a blocked user agent?
I t
See the ErrorDocument directive.
Now, why is that response not suitable? And why would you respond with a
200 for a blocked user agent?
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 11:26 AM Marc wrote:
> Where/how can I change this message?
>
> The server encountered an internal error or
> misconfiguration and was
