On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> In a shared HOSTING environment, you're absolutely correct.
> The OPs stated goal had nothing to do with shared hosting, although he
> generalized the request to extend that far.
>
> Perhaps I should have made more plain that I am in no way
On 2011-08-15 16:37, Pete Houston wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 10:16:29AM -0400, Ben Timby wrote:
In the above way, the administrator could delegate control of portions
of the configuration to a user without the overhead of an .htaccess
file. Also, you could include a file which in turn includ
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 10:16:29AM -0400, Ben Timby wrote:
> In the above way, the administrator could delegate control of portions
> of the configuration to a user without the overhead of an .htaccess
> file. Also, you could include a file which in turn includes other
> files. Thus, the administra
I think the one gem in this email is the following:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 7:48 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 2011-08-15 12:34, lists.sebast...@abwesend.de wrote:
>> If one puts all these things into one big file, it can become confusing
>> and hard to maintain. It would be easier to keep track
Uhmm, actually, I'm a bit disappointed. I wasn't unfriendly and I'm not aware
of having done anything wrong. However, your answer sounds quite a little bit
aggressive to me. I didn't mean to offend anyone. It was just an idea on
.htaccess - nothing evil and I didn't mean mischief.
> That is the
On 2011-08-15 12:34, lists.sebast...@abwesend.de wrote:
Hi,
I have an idea on .htaccess files or rather a tiny feature request. :) Before I post it
to the bugzilla system as a "real" feature request, I wanted to put the idea up
for discussion. ;) By the way, Apache is a really great piece of s
