> Op 17 nov. 2021 om 05:23 heeft Gabriel Santos
> het volgende geschreven:
>
>
> Hi,my name is Gabriel and i want to build a apache server with SSLv2
> technology (because thee service i want to use only supports SSLv2)
Use another service.
> and i having errors with many openssl versions(
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 12:51 Tom Jubb wrote:
> Understood. Just trying to exhaust all possible solutions before doing an OS
> upgrade.
FYI, I recently completed a local src build of Apache 2.4.43 (and APR
and APR-UTIL), and OpenSSL 1.1.1g on Debian 10 Buster. I have
documented the process on m
s question is better brought up in a SuSE listerv and not the
general Apache listserv.
From: Dennis Clarke
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2020 12:59 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 and tls 1.2
On 7/23/20 4:41 PM, Tom Jubb wro
On 7/23/20 4:41 PM, Tom Jubb wrote:
> New certs will successfully installed on Apache 2.2
Apache 2.2 ?
That was End of Life a while ago.
You have a bigger problem. Migrate to 2.4.43 and then deal with certs
and such.
--
Dennis Clarke
RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC
UNIX and Linux spoken
GreyBeard
Thank your for your reply.
Yes, I have already traveled down that route and talked with our DevOps
guys. The system that handles SSL termination is a system they want little
or no configuration on. They (DevOps) understand that this could be
handled there, but they wont make the change there.
T
It is perfectly normal for a backend that works with http to return
internal Location headers with http.
If apache is the backend of some other reverse proxy it is the job of that
reverse proxy to use the correct url scheme requested by the client, that
is, to revert the location headers back to "
id 3649] core_filters.c(525):
[client 10.0.1.110:58427] core_output_filter: flushing because of FLUSH bucket
From: Luca Toscano [mailto:toscano.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2016 10:06 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.2 - mod_authnz_ldap
Hi Andy,
2016-11-02 16:24 GMT+01:00 Speagle, Andy :
> Hi Folks,
>
>
>
> I’m having some issues getting SSL or TLS working with mod_authnz_ldap in
> my chroot’ed Apache 2.2 server on RHEL 6.8 … it works without SSL just
> fine. I’m using the built-in “ChrootDir” directive with Apache. I seem to
Another interesting observation: web browser (Firefox) continues to show
activity spinner and "read " status (with AuthLDAP active at web
application initiation) even after the LDAP authentication is completed, the
OpenLDAP server is stopped, and the LDAP network connection is dropped. I can't
see
The persistent LDAP connection between Apache/mod_authnz_ldap and OpenLDAP is
not an LDAP nor OpenLDAP error. Debug logging has confirmed this.
It appears that Apache(v2.2)/mod_authnz_ldap establishes and maintains a
persistent network connection to the designated LDAP server. Documentation for
mo
2016-05-03 1:22 GMT+02:00 J.D. :
> Centos-6.6+seLinux, Apache-2.2, OpenLDAP-2.4.40, OpenSSL-1.0.1e-fips
>
> Using the following sample Directory block, the Apache LDAP authentication
> works
> just fine, but when the web page is displayed - the activity spinner is
> spinning
> and the status bar s
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Michael A. Peters
wrote:
> I can't find anything official but 1.3 went EOL in 2010 and 2.0 went EOL in
> 2013.
> $ GET -m HEAD "http://$one_of_my_production_servers/";
403 Forbidden
Connection: close
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 17:26:12 GMT
Server: Apache/1.3.42 (Unix)
Hello!
2016-03-21 17:11 GMT+01:00 James Smith :
>
>
> On 3/21/2016 4:07 PM, Michael A. Peters wrote:
>
>> On 03/21/2016 08:51 AM, ismail berrada wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Can someone tell me when Apache 2.2 EOL will occurs ?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>>
>> I can't find anything official but 1.3 went EO
On 3/21/2016 4:07 PM, Michael A. Peters wrote:
On 03/21/2016 08:51 AM, ismail berrada wrote:
Hi
Can someone tell me when Apache 2.2 EOL will occurs ?
Regards
I can't find anything official but 1.3 went EOL in 2010 and 2.0 went
EOL in 2013.
Not enough data points to say there's a trend,
Thanks for the answer.
Le Lundi 21 mars 2016 17h07, Michael A. Peters a
écrit :
On 03/21/2016 08:51 AM, ismail berrada wrote:
> Hi
>
> Can someone tell me when Apache 2.2 EOL will occurs ?
>
> Regards
>
I can't find anything official but 1.3 went EOL in 2010 and 2.0 went EOL
in 2
On 03/21/2016 08:51 AM, ismail berrada wrote:
Hi
Can someone tell me when Apache 2.2 EOL will occurs ?
Regards
I can't find anything official but 1.3 went EOL in 2010 and 2.0 went EOL
in 2013.
Not enough data points to say there's a trend, but it wouldn't surprise
me if 2.2 doesn't have
hange the context of my
rules to exist at the server level?
Thanks again,
-Kimmel
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 09:26:10 -0400
From: cove...@gmail.com
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.2 RewriteRule/Proxypass and general
processing flow
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 9:20 AM,
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Lesley Kimmel
wrote:
> This leads me to believe that proxypass takes precedence over RewriteRule,
> can you confirm this?
Depends on the context of your RewriteRules. Yours imply or
htaccess which runs later. ProxyPass happens before (instead of) the URL
has
On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 02:14:36PM +, Mark jensen wrote:
> and I have found this line in conf file:
>
> LoadModule expires module modules/mod_expires.so
>
> but "ExpireDefault" didn't work
There's no such directive in Apache 2.2 as "ExpireDefault". Perhaps if
you tried "ExpiresDefault" you m
Doing httpd -M | grep expire:
expires_module (shared)
Syntax OK
and I have found this line in conf file:
LoadModule expires module modules/mod_expires.so
but "ExpireDefault" didn't work
Load it with LoadModule
(use -M to show dynamically loaded modules.)
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Mark jensen wrote:
> doing httpd -l returns:
>
> core.c
> prefork.c
> http_core.c
> mod_so.c
>
> How to enable the mod_expires module?
>
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com
-
7;s based on the fact that the undesired JSESSIONID cookie
contains an exclamation mark in it (it's set by Weblogic). If that
changes I'm out of luck...
-Original Message-
From: Eric Covener [mailto:cove...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 4:04 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.o
> The first two lines above work fine, but unfortunately the last one
> doesn't because the "RequestHeader edit" directive cannot reference
> environment variables in its replacement string (why?). :~(
These things are not just emergent. Someone has to ask for it. Someone
else has to implement, te
Hello Igor,
here is the mysql logs:
130128 13:38:42 mysqld_safe Starting mysqld daemon with databases from
/var/db/mysql
130128 13:38:49 [Note] Plugin 'FEDERATED' is disabled.
130128 13:38:53 InnoDB: Started; log sequence number 0 44243
130128 13:38:55 [Note] Event Scheduler: Loaded 0 events
13012
On 06/03/2013 7:38 AM, "motty cruz" wrote:
>
> Hello, I'm have one instance of Wordpress running on a FreeBSD machine
with php 5.2 install using Apache Web Server 2.2. Every time the webmaster
edit pages I get the following error:
>
> 12:15:36 2013] [error] child process 27973 still did not exit,
> I do not have deeper knowledge about protocols but I think as follows: DTLS
> means TLS for datagram packets so it means http does not use DTLS, right? On
> the other hand, TLS is affected in OpenSSL 1.0.1 and later which means
> 0.9.8-related version is not affected, right?
>
> Thus, can I imply
On 11/19/2012 6:07 PM, David Mehler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks to everyone who helped. I have it working. Here it is for
> anyone this might help.
>
> Hth
> Dave.
>
> Set up for Mysql authentication:
>
> Create a mysql database:
> create database web;
> grant select, insert, update, delete on
Hello,
Thanks to everyone who helped. I have it working. Here it is for
anyone this might help.
Hth
Dave.
Set up for Mysql authentication:
Create a mysql database:
create database web;
grant select, insert, update, delete on web.* to web_user@localhost
identified by 'xxx';
flush privileges;
use
Hello,
Apache doesn't support password hashes generated by mysql. Use htpasswd or
openssl to generate hashes that are supported by apache:
htpasswd -nbm username password
openssl passwd -apr1 password
Adam Black,
FINESEC.COM - authentication software for Apache
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 4:10 PM,
- Original Message -
> Hello,
>
> When I inserted the user in to the mysql database I have a field
> called password it's a varchar(64) field. For the password value I
> used mysql's sha function so the entry looked like:
>
> sha('password')
>
> won the insert line.
>
> I'm not sure i
Hello,
When I inserted the user in to the mysql database I have a field
called password it's a varchar(64) field. For the password value I
used mysql's sha function so the entry looked like:
sha('password')
won the insert line.
I'm not sure if that answers your question.
Thanks.
Dave.
On 11/
- Original Message -
> Hello,
>
> I am still trying to get my apache to authenticate against a mysql
> database. I've looked at my available options and it looked like
> mod_auth_mysql was discontinued so that was a non-starter. My other
> option was mod_dbd with the apr-util-mysql drive
Hello,
I am still trying to get my apache to authenticate against a mysql
database. I've looked at my available options and it looked like
mod_auth_mysql was discontinued so that was a non-starter. My other
option was mod_dbd with the apr-util-mysql driver, well that one also
didn't work, I kept g
Hello,
Do you have this working? If so can I get a look at your config?
Thanks.
Dave.
On 11/18/12, Igor Galić wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm wanting to set up Apache 2.2 to authenticate using either basic
>> or
>> digest authentication whichever I decide to do, a
- Original Message -
> Hello,
>
> I'm wanting to set up Apache 2.2 to authenticate using either basic
> or
> digest authentication whichever I decide to do, against a Mysql
> Database. I am running Apache 2.2 and mysql 5.52.
>
> Ive set up authentication using textfiles in the past now
On 3/13/2012 12:25 PM, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:19 PM, William Taylor
> wrote:
>> I wouldn't say it's silly, but definitely not the norm and obviously a
>> low priority
>> for everyone else.
>
> I would say that forking an entire new process to handle a single
> request and t
On Mar 13, 2012, at 1:40 PM, William Taylor wrote:
> It's unfortunate that it has to work this way but forks are pretty cheap
> these days.
>
> No it doesn't generate content. It can't run as a CGI.
Cheap != free no matter how cheap ;)
---
On Mar 13, 2012, at 1:25 PM, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:19 PM, William Taylor
> wrote:
>> I wouldn't say it's silly, but definitely not the norm and obviously a
>> low priority
>> for everyone else.
>
> I would say that forking an entire new process to handle a single
> reque
On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 10:25:54 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:19 PM, William Taylor
> wrote:
>>
>> I wouldn't say it's silly, but definitely not the norm and obviously a
>> low priority
>> for everyone else.
>
>
> I would say that forking an entire new process to handle a
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:19 PM, William Taylor wrote:
> I wouldn't say it's silly, but definitely not the norm and obviously a
> low priority
> for everyone else.
I would say that forking an entire new process to handle a single
request and then exiting could possibly be the most silly way to se
On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 10:11:17 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:58 PM, William Taylor
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 2:42:35 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 7:39 PM, William Taylor
>>> wrote:
Previously posted to dev and bu
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:58 PM, William Taylor wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 2:42:35 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 7:39 PM, William Taylor
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Previously posted to dev and bugs. Posting here also in hopes of
>>> capturing a greater audience that might hav
On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 2:42:35 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 7:39 PM, William Taylor
> wrote:
>>
>> Previously posted to dev and bugs. Posting here also in hopes of
>> capturing a greater audience that might have come
>> across this issue before.
>>
>> We have written a modu
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 7:39 PM, William Taylor wrote:
> Previously posted to dev and bugs. Posting here also in hopes of
> capturing a greater audience that might have come
> across this issue before.
>
> We have written a modules for apache that for certain reasons requires
> one hit per child.
I don't know the answer, but the way I would probably try to find the
answer is to do what you have already done: Try it and see what happens.
- Y
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Morse, Richard E.MGH wrote:
> Hi! I was wondering if anyone had had a chance to look at this? Or could
> tell me w
Hi! I was wondering if anyone had had a chance to look at this? Or could tell
me where to look to find the answer? The manual doesn't seem to have this,
noone has answered my query on ServerFault, and my skills at reading the httpd
source aren't up to answering it that way...
Thanks,
Ricky
On
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Geoff Millikan wrote:
>>> When both RequestReadTimeout and Timeout values are set, the smaller
>>> of the two takes precedence, right? For example, if Timeout 6 and
>>> RequestReadTimeout header=10 body=30 then Apache will close the connection
>>> at 6 seconds and
>> When both RequestReadTimeout and Timeout values are set, the smaller
>> of the two takes precedence, right? For example, if Timeout 6 and
>> RequestReadTimeout header=10 body=30 then Apache will close the connection
>> at 6 seconds and the RequestReadTimeout will never be activated, right?
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Geoff Millikan
wrote:
> When both RequestReadTimeout and Timeout values are set, the smaller of the
> two takes precedence, right? For example, if Timeout 6
> and RequestReadTimeout header=10 body=30 then Apache will close the
> connection at 6 seconds and the
On 06/07/2011 10:59 PM, Rob Morin wrote:
Hello all was not sure how to word my subject line...
I posted a few weeks back on how could I increase performance of
apache... I received quite a few replies and they all helped a bit...
We even added an additional server to our server cluster to to
On 3/18/2011 2:36 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
> William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> I've not tried running the 'official builds', and while I would
> expect them to work but there have been reports of problems. That may just be
> finger
> trouble, but when reporting problems on the PHP list at least one can
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
If anyone wants to have a civil discourse, not in the role of the current
uninformed BFoD win32 "officious" port, there are several of us who will
steer you in the right direction :)
It is a debate that has been going on for some time on the PHP developers list
after
On 3/17/2011 4:53 PM, Yehuda Katz wrote:
> In PHP's release announcement today (for version 5.3.6), they announced that
> they are no
> longer releasing dll s that are compatible with the current builds of httpd
> for Windows.
> Are there any official builds that are compatible with PHP's VC9 bui
Yehuda Katz wrote:
In PHP's release announcement today (for version 5.3.6), they announced
that they are no longer releasing dll s that are compatible with the
current builds of httpd for Windows.
Are there any official builds that are compatible with PHP's VC9 builds
(or any plans to make them a
Apache users:
I've boiled the example down, attempted to clarify, and re-posted it on
the debian-user mailing list:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2011/02/msg02171.html
David
-
The official User-To-User support for
On 02/20/2011 12:37 PM, Igor Galić wrote:
Why?
>> I'm trying to learn how to use the Apache rewrite module
> (http://bash.org/?866112)
As a matter of fact, I *do* know how to operate a jackhammer. Do you
need your demons let out? ;-)
Also, I have attempted to enable the rewrite log an
- Original Message -
> Apache users:
>
> I'm trying to learn how to use the Apache rewrite module to redirect
> incoming hits for virtual *.html pages to Perl CGI scripts using the
> information provided in the Apache 2.2 manual "URL Rewriting Guide"
> chapter "From Static to Dynamic" se
DiRico, Nick wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've checked on the httpd.apache.org site for information on when the
> stable Apache 2.2 release will be made public but did not find an actual
> date. Does anyone know when Apache 2.2 will be made public?
When it's ready.
We don't do silly deadlines. That me
58 matches
Mail list logo
