RE: [users@httpd] mod_ssl, erratic performance

2011-01-28 Thread john.3.newton
- Igor Galić [mailto:i.ga...@brainsware.org] wrote: > >- "john 3 newton" wrote: > >> Solaris 10 >> Apache version: 2.2.11 & 2.2.17 (32 &64 bit) >> >> We recently moved our production webserver from a sparc platform >> (T2000) to an x86/64 platform (x2270-m2) and we have noticed an >> erra

RE: [users@httpd] mod_ssl, erratic performance

2011-01-28 Thread john.3.newton
On Thursday, January 27, 2011 11:24 AM, >Am 27.01.2011 16:34, schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: >> On 22.01.11 00:53, john.3.new...@bt.com wrote: >>> >>> We recently moved our production webserver from a sparc platform (T2000) >>> to an x86/64 platform (x2270-m2) and we have noticed an erratic respo

RE: [users@httpd] mod_ssl, erratic performance

2011-01-28 Thread john.3.newton
> >random device can make a huge difference. What do you use for random data? >/dev/random or /dev/urandom? If the rofmer, try the latter if it helps. >-- >Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Matus - I have actually tried both, as well as builtin. I have also var

Re: [users@httpd] mod_ssl, erratic performance

2011-01-28 Thread Igor Galić
- "john 3 newton" wrote: > Solaris 10 > Apache version: 2.2.11 & 2.2.17 (32 &64 bit) > > We recently moved our production webserver from a sparc platform > (T2000) to an x86/64 platform (x2270-m2) and we have noticed an > erratic response time for downloads of files using SSL. This seems to

Re: [users@httpd] mod_ssl, erratic performance

2011-01-27 Thread Edgar Frank
Am 27.01.2011 16:34, schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: On 22.01.11 00:53, john.3.new...@bt.com wrote: We recently moved our production webserver from a sparc platform (T2000) to an x86/64 platform (x2270-m2) and we have noticed an erratic response time for downloads of files using SSL. This seems

Re: [users@httpd] mod_ssl, erratic performance

2011-01-27 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 22.01.11 00:53, john.3.new...@bt.com wrote: > > We recently moved our production webserver from a sparc platform (T2000) > to an x86/64 platform (x2270-m2) and we have noticed an erratic response > time for downloads of files using SSL. This seems to randomly occur with > any files about 10k or

RE: [users@httpd] mod_ssl, erratic performance

2011-01-24 Thread john.3.newton
t: Re: [users@httpd] mod_ssl, erratic performance I found that turning KeepAlive On makes a huge difference to SSL performance (or performance in general). On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 11:53 AM, wrote: > Solaris 10 > Apache version: 2.2.11 & 2.2.17 (32 &64 bit) > > We recently moved

Re: [users@httpd] mod_ssl, erratic performance

2011-01-22 Thread Devraj Mukherjee
I found that turning KeepAlive On makes a huge difference to SSL performance (or performance in general). On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 11:53 AM, wrote: > Solaris 10 > Apache version: 2.2.11 & 2.2.17 (32 &64 bit) > > We recently moved our production webserver from a sparc platform (T2000) to > an x86