: Daniel [mailto:dferra...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2016 04:30
To:
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Problems with Event MPM Performance Tuning in 2.4.18
As a real mitigation, maybe you could just use to mod_proxy and
mod_proxy_balancer, also those are not third party modules and probably will
As a real mitigation, maybe you could just use to mod_proxy and
mod_proxy_balancer, also those are not third party modules and probably
will render the same functionality you seek.
2016-06-27 9:50 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano :
>
>
> 2016-06-06 16:48 GMT+02:00 Houser, Rick :
>
>> > So afaik the current
2016-06-06 16:48 GMT+02:00 Houser, Rick :
> > So afaik the current 2.4 behavior is to enforce the minimum number of
> spare threads as
> >
> > ThreadsPerChild * num_buckets
> >
> > with num_buckets equal 1 if you are not leveraging SO_REUSEPORT (
> https://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mpm_com
> So afaik the current 2.4 behavior is to enforce the minimum number of spare
> threads as
>
> ThreadsPerChild * num_buckets
>
> with num_buckets equal 1 if you are not leveraging SO_REUSEPORT
> (https://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mpm_common.html#listencoresbucketsratio).
> This means
[Re-arranging posts a bit to follow the email thread flow]
2016-05-31 18:49 GMT+02:00 Houser, Rick :
>
>
>
> *From:* Luca Toscano [mailto:toscano.l...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 31, 2016 11:02
> *To:* users@httpd.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: [users@httpd] Pr
if I can’t
dig something up.
Rick Houser
Web Administration
(517)367-3516
From: Luca Toscano [mailto:toscano.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 11:02
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Problems with Event MPM Performance Tuning in 2.4.18
Hi Rick!
2016-05-31 15:57
Hi Rick!
2016-05-31 15:57 GMT+02:00 Houser, Rick :
> I have to deal with mod_cluster, and it is extremely memory hungry (in the
> GB range per process). As mitigation, I’m trying to get down to a single
> apache worker process per host when we aren’t under heavy load. That would
> save me about
