Hence the reason for the rewrite in 2.3/2.4.
Balancer-manager in prev versions was NEVER intended for
long-term usage. The issue is in the interaction of balancer-manager
and mod_proxy_balancer, not the balancer itself.
On Aug 4, 2011, at 10:57 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 3:43
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> You will note that the balancer in 2.3/2.4 resolves this issue.
>
> BTW, the idea that mod_proxy_balancer is "broken" only means that
> it does not do what you expect, which is restore all local mods
> made via balancer_manager, but this was n
On Aug 4, 2011, at 7:40 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 2:14 AM, Jeff Poling wrote:
>> Thanks. For whatever reason, an apachectl stop and an apachectl start
>> corrected the issue- the balancer-manager now reflects the config in the
>> config file
>>
>
> mod_proxy_balancer is
Tom,
> mod_proxy_balancer is dangerous to use when doing graceful restarts.
> The state of the balancers is saved, and then re-applied, however various
> things can cause the settings to be applied to a different balancer member.
Thanks for the information on the bugs. I really appreciate it! We
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 2:14 AM, Jeff Poling wrote:
> Thanks. For whatever reason, an apachectl stop and an apachectl start
> corrected the issue- the balancer-manager now reflects the config in the
> config file
>
mod_proxy_balancer is dangerous to use when doing graceful restarts.
The state o
www.moodyministries.net
From the Word. To Life.
> -Original Message-
> From: aceror [mailto:aceror2...@yahoo.es]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 6:12 PM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Load Balancing question
>
> Check this, maybe help
>
&
Check this, maybe help
http://www.issociate.de/board/post/478439/mod_rewrite_
+_mod_proxy_trouble.html
El mié, 03-08-2011 a las 12:47 -0500, Jeff Poling escribió:
> We are using apache to load balance many of our web sites. Over the
> last few weeks, we have migrated sites to new back end serv
