[users@httpd] Solved was Re: [users@httpd] Apache taking (exactly) 30 seconds to serve static images

2012-07-16 Thread ohaya
"Macks wrote: > Can you run either strace (or dtrace depending on platform) against the > running process and see what it is doing during the request? > > A > -- > Aaron Macks > Sr. Unix Systems Engineer > > Harvard Business Publishing > 300 North Beacon St.| Watertown, MA 02472 > (

Re: [users@httpd] Apache taking (exactly) 30 seconds to serve static images

2012-07-16 Thread Macks, Aaron
Can you run either strace (or dtrace depending on platform) against the running process and see what it is doing during the request? A -- Aaron Macks Sr. Unix Systems Engineer Harvard Business Publishing 300 North Beacon St.| Watertown, MA 02472 (617) 783-7461| Fax: (617)

Re: [users@httpd] Apache taking (exactly) 30 seconds to serve static images

2012-07-16 Thread ohaya
Vivek Nambiar wrote: > May be you can add the hostname and ipaddress in the linux hosts > file,restart apache and see if that makes any difference?? > > Thanks > VIVEK > Hi Vivek, I made suer that there was an entry in /etc/hosts, with both the FQDN and short hostname and bounced Apache

RE: [users@httpd] Apache taking (exactly) 30 seconds to serve static images

2012-07-16 Thread ohaya
David Hubbard wrote: > From: Garrison, Jim (ETW) [mailto:jim.garri...@nike.com] > > > > > -Original Message----- > > > Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache taking (exactly) 30 > > seconds to serve > > > static images > > > > Just

Re: [users@httpd] Apache taking (exactly) 30 seconds to serve static images

2012-07-16 Thread Vivek Nambiar
@nike.com] > > > > > -Original Message----- > > > Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache taking (exactly) 30 > > seconds to serve > > > static images > > > > Just a wild guess, but is it possible Apache is configured to resolve > > Hostnames and rDNS is not

RE: [users@httpd] Apache taking (exactly) 30 seconds to serve static images

2012-07-16 Thread David Hubbard
From: Garrison, Jim (ETW) [mailto:jim.garri...@nike.com] > > > -Original Message- > > Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache taking (exactly) 30 > seconds to serve > > static images > > Just a wild guess, but is it possible Apache is configured to resolve >

RE: [users@httpd] Apache taking (exactly) 30 seconds to serve static images

2012-07-16 Thread ohaya
"Garrison wrote: > > -Original Message- > > Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache taking (exactly) 30 seconds to serve > > static images > > Just a wild guess, but is it possible Apache is configured to resolve > Hostnames and rDNS is not set up corr

RE: [users@httpd] Apache taking (exactly) 30 seconds to serve static images

2012-07-16 Thread Garrison, Jim (ETW)
> -Original Message- > Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache taking (exactly) 30 seconds to serve > static images Just a wild guess, but is it possible Apache is configured to resolve Hostnames and rDNS is not set up

Re: [users@httpd] Apache taking (exactly) 30 seconds to serve static images

2012-07-16 Thread ohaya
Nick Kew wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:47:54 -0400 > wrote: > > > Has anyone encountered something like this. What timeouts might be set to > > 30 seconds in Apache that might be causing this kind of behavior? > > Check your keepalive. > > If your browser, or some agent on the netwo

Re: [users@httpd] Apache taking (exactly) 30 seconds to serve static images

2012-07-16 Thread Nick Kew
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:47:54 -0400 wrote: > Has anyone encountered something like this. What timeouts might be set to 30 > seconds in Apache that might be causing this kind of behavior? Check your keepalive. If your browser, or some agent on the network, is getting its knickers in a twist abo