chuck,
* Peter Schober [2009-11-17 23:54]:
> * chuck.pa...@travelchannel.com [2009-11-17
> 17:42]:
> > Because we are running productions, as stated on the Apache site in
> > BOLD letters, mod_ajp is not for production use. We see our jboss
> > down with it.
>
> I see a few references to mod_a
chuck,
* chuck.pa...@travelchannel.com [2009-11-17
17:42]:
> Because we are running productions, as stated on the Apache site in
> BOLD letters, mod_ajp is not for production use. We see our jboss
> down with it.
I see a few references to mod_ajp from 2004 (e.g. in this thread[1])
but I guess y
Mark Watts [m.wa...@eris.qinetiq.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 10:30 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Question about mod_ajp and mod_jk
ProxyPassReverse
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 10:21 -0500, chuck.pa...@travelchannel.com wrote:
> Guys,
>
> We are switching out mod
...@eris.qinetiq.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 10:30 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Question about mod_ajp and mod_jk ProxyPassReverse
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 10:21 -0500, chuck.pa...@travelchannel.com wrote:
> Guys,
>
> We are switching out mod_ajp for mod_jk and have r
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:21 PM, wrote:
> Guys,
>
> We are switching out mod_ajp for mod_jk and have ran into a wall with
> ProxyPass and ProxyPassReverse.
>
> With mod_ajp we have this setting
>
>
>
> BalancerMember ajp://tomcat05:8009 smax=20 min=0 max=10 loadfactor=1
> flushpackets=on rout
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 10:21 -0500, chuck.pa...@travelchannel.com wrote:
> Guys,
>
> We are switching out mod_ajp for mod_jk and have ran into a wall with
> ProxyPass and ProxyPassReverse.
Most people ditch mod_jk for mod_proxy_ajp.
Care to elaborate as to why mod_proxy_ajp isn't working for you
