On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 05:10:06PM +0100, Sylvain Thénault wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 05:07:18PM +0100, Sylvain Thénault wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 03:39:22PM +, Nick Kew wrote:
> > > On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:31:18 +0100
> > > Sylvain Thénault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 05:07:18PM +0100, Sylvain Thénault wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 03:39:22PM +, Nick Kew wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:31:18 +0100
> > Sylvain Thénault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Any hint on how can I acheive this ?
> >
> > Upgrade to 2.2.8 and read th
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 03:39:22PM +, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:31:18 +0100
> Sylvain Thénault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Any hint on how can I acheive this ?
>
> Upgrade to 2.2.8 and read the CHANGES file. Then you'll
> know what to look for in the docs (either -B or n
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 04:37:38PM +0100, Chirouze Olivier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What exactly do you mean by "keeps seeing"? Did you try to play with the URI
> (logs, RewriteCond, etc) to make absolutely sure that it's the INPUT URI that
> is decoded, or could it be the "output" URI (the rewriten one
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:31:18 +0100
Sylvain Thénault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any hint on how can I acheive this ?
Upgrade to 2.2.8 and read the CHANGES file. Then you'll
know what to look for in the docs (either -B or nocanon,
depending on how you're configuring it).
--
Nick Kew
Applicat
Hi,
What exactly do you mean by "keeps seeing"? Did you try to play with the URI
(logs, RewriteCond, etc) to make absolutely sure that it's the INPUT URI that
is decoded, or could it be the "output" URI (the rewriten one) that is decoded?
Olivier
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PRO
