[ mod_headers cannot modify existing headers ]
In case anyone comes across the same problem, I have not found a solution.
I have run the simple tests below on a xampp-dsl virtual machine, and they work
exactly as I expect they should, leading me to believe that there is something
fundamentaly wr
On 8/10/07, Jeff Murch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Joshua. I found that it is nod_proxy_html v2 that is causing the
> character set problem. Version 2 only outputs UTF-8. This was corrected in 3
> to allow you to specify a character set. So, I have downloaded the source
> for 3 and compile
EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Slive
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 12:04 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_headers mapping problem
On 8/10/07, Jeff Murch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would you please show me an example of how I would unconditionally rewrite
&
On 8/10/07, Jeff Murch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would you please show me an example of how I would unconditionally rewrite
> the character-type header from utf-8?
>
> I am trying, and I know the syntax is more like pseudocode:
>
> RewriteEngine On
> rewriterule ^C"Content-Type: text/html;charse
-8859-1"
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Slive
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 11:37 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_headers mapping problem
On 8/10/07, Jeff Murch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
On 8/10/07, Jeff Murch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wouldn't using RewriteCond be able to do that?
No. RewriteCond can act on request headers but not response headers
(since mod_rewrite must do rewriting before the response is written).
Joshua.
---
Wouldn't using RewriteCond be able to do that?
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Slive
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 11:14 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_headers mapping problem
On 8/
On 8/10/07, Jeff Murch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> More info:
>
> It seems that none of the headers will unset...
Standard protocol-required headers like Content-Type, Connection, etc,
can't generally be manipulated with mod_headers.
mod_rewrite can manipulate content-type, but I don't think
Wrong again. SOME of the headers won't unset. Content-Type won't,
Connection won't, but Server will
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Murch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 11:07 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECT
More info:
It seems that none of the headers will unset...
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Murch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 11:06 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_headers mapping problem
I changed the syntax in the
10, 2007 10:44 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_headers mapping problem
Jeff Murch wrote:
>I am trying to map the following in my httpd.conf (for a reverse proxy):
>
>header unset "Content-Type: text/html;charset=utf-8"
>header add Content-
Thanks Dragon.
What if I only want it remapped when the Content-Type is UTF-8?
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Dragon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 10:44 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_headers mapping problem
Jeff Murch wrote
Jeff Murch wrote:
I am trying to map the following in my httpd.conf (for a reverse proxy):
header unset "Content-Type: text/html;charset=utf-8"
header add Content-Type "Content-Type: text/html;charset=iso-8859-1"
As you can see I want to change the content type so that some of the
characters r
On 5/23/07, elwyatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm running an admittedly old Apache 1.3.6 server configuration
My guess is that the line above answers your two questions below.
And so, the questions:
1. Shouldn't the header directive still be parsed via mod_headers, and
shouldn't I expec
> On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 09:43 -0500, Joshua Slive wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 09:18 -0500, Joshua Slive wrote:
> > >
> > > > But what you don't want is an HTTP server.
> > >
> > > True, although http would be suitable if I could reduce the
> > unecessary
> > > bandwidth from the headers.
> >
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 15:40 +0100, Frode E. Moe wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 22:31:48 +0800, Dan Nelson wrote:
> > > Luckily, the 2.x version
> > > has been designed to support multiple protocols. See mod_echo (or
> > > mod_pop3 or mod_ftpd) for an example of how to substitute another
> > >
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 09:43 -0500, Joshua Slive wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 09:18 -0500, Joshua Slive wrote:
> >
> > > But what you don't want is an HTTP server.
> >
> > True, although http would be suitable if I could reduce the
> unecessary
> > bandwidth from the headers.
>
> But the header
On 11/23/06, Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 09:18 -0500, Joshua Slive wrote:
> But what you don't want is an HTTP server.
True, although http would be suitable if I could reduce the unecessary
bandwidth from the headers.
But the headers are an inherent part of HTT
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 22:31:48 +0800, Dan Nelson wrote:
> > Luckily, the 2.x version
> > has been designed to support multiple protocols. See mod_echo (or
> > mod_pop3 or mod_ftpd) for an example of how to substitute another
> > protocol module for the http protocol module.
>
> Does that mean
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 09:18 -0500, Joshua Slive wrote:
> But what you don't want is an HTTP server.
True, although http would be suitable if I could reduce the unecessary
bandwidth from the headers.
> Luckily, the 2.x version
> has been designed to support multiple protocols. See mod_echo (or
On 11/23/06, Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 11:32 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> Why do you want to use apache (HTTP server) when you want your application
> send no headers (e.g. no HTTP response)?
Because Apache is robust, efficient, flexible, bulletproof,
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 11:21 +, Nick Kew wrote:
> No headers at all?
I'd like to get rid of as many as I can. But I can't seem to get rid of
any, well, except the ones I create myself.
> You can't do that in response to an HTTP/1.x
> request, because (bugs aside), Apache won't break HTTP a
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 11:32 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> Why do you want to use apache (HTTP server) when you want your application
> send no headers (e.g. no HTTP response)?
Because Apache is robust, efficient, flexible, bulletproof, easy to
interface to virtually any database, easy to
On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:28:51 +0800
Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm running Apache 2.0 on Debian Sarge.
>
> I have a non-standard application for Apache, and don't want to send
> any headers in the response.
No headers at all? You can't do that in response to an HTTP/1.x
request,
On 23.11.06 11:28, Dan Nelson wrote:
> I'm running Apache 2.0 on Debian Sarge.
>
> I have a non-standard application for Apache, and don't want to send any
> headers in the response. I thought I'd be able to do so using
> mod_headers.
Why do you want to use apache (HTTP server) when you want you
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 4:29 AM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_headers
>
>
> I'm running Apache 2.0 on Debian Sarge.
>
> I have a non-standard application for Apache, and don't w
26 matches
Mail list logo
