2.2.4 against a test suite of my own, and it passed all
the tests that failed with 2.0.
-ascs
-Message d'origine-
De : Campbell, Lance [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : mardi 8 janvier 2008 19:32
À : users@httpd.apache.org
Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod
Slive
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 11:27 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_disk_cache
On Jan 7, 2008 12:12 PM, Campbell, Lance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua,
> I don't understand what you are saying. Is there some command
parameter
> you
On Jan 7, 2008 1:31 PM, Campbell, Lance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It works! Thanks!
>
> They really need to add that to the apache documentation.
There's a lot of stuff about mod_cache that is not explicitly
documented. This is because mod_cache is supposed to be a fairly
strict implementation
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua
Slive
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 11:27 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_disk_cache
On Jan 7, 2008 12:12 PM, Campbell, Lance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua,
> I don't understand what you are saying. Is there some
On Jan 7, 2008 12:12 PM, Campbell, Lance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua,
> I don't understand what you are saying. Is there some command parameter
> you can send to htcacheclean or is there a special way of formatting the
> requested cached URL that will cause it to be refreshed?
Just make a
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 10:46 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_disk_cache
On Jan 7, 2008 12:59 AM, Campbell, Lance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> httpd-2.0.59
>
>
>
> Does mod_disk_cache support a mechanism that one can
On Jan 7, 2008 12:59 AM, Campbell, Lance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> httpd-2.0.59
>
>
>
> Does mod_disk_cache support a mechanism that one can request a particular
> URL to have its content refreshed?
Sure, if you send the appropriate Cache-Control headers on your
request, you should forc
: Vincent Bray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : lundi 8 octobre 2007 10:38
À : users@httpd.apache.org
Objet : Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_disk_cache and mod_rewrite
On 08/10/2007, Janne Kario <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem is that mod_rewrite and mod_disk_cache don't a
On 08/10/2007, Janne Kario <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem is that mod_rewrite and mod_disk_cache don't appear to well
> together and mod_disk_cache seems to ignore all that mod_rewrite does.
I've found that to be a problem too. In my case, I used a reverse
proxy on the rewrite rule to se
On 24 May 2007, at 00:56, Joshua Slive wrote:
On 5/23/07, Ion Alexandru Morega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 13 May 2007, at 16:05, Ion Alexandru Morega wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm having trouble using mod_cache/mod_disk_cache and mod_deflate
> at the same time.
There's some patches committed to th
On 5/23/07, Ion Alexandru Morega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 13 May 2007, at 16:05, Ion Alexandru Morega wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm having trouble using mod_cache/mod_disk_cache and mod_deflate
> at the same time.
There's some patches committed to the trunk (development) version of
mod_cache that f
On 13 May 2007, at 16:05, Ion Alexandru Morega wrote:
Hi.
I'm having trouble using mod_cache/mod_disk_cache and mod_deflate
at the same time.
My setup is like this: one Tomcat 5.5 webapp, Apache 2.2.3 + mod_jk
1.2.18. The intent is to cache pages generated by the webapp; as
long as the p
On 10/31/06, KevinK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am using Apache 2.0.55 with mod_disk_cache and mod_deflate. When a user
who supports HTTP compression gets the same URL twice, they get it with HTTP
compression the first time, but without compression on subsequent times when
it gets served from
TED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 5:52 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod_disk_cache| Struggling to configure
I am currently using apache 'httpd-2.0.52'. I can't change the version for some
reasons.
Tried to hit the application from another machin
On 11/29/05, Arindam Bhattacharjee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am currently using apache 'httpd-2.0.52'. I can't change the version
> for some reasons.
I'm not personally interested in trying to debug mod_cache problems
with an old version like that. Too much work has gone into the module
sinc
shua Slive [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 9:19 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod_disk_cache| Struggling to configure
On 11/29/05, Arindam Bhattacharjee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The logs are showing me something like
&
On 11/29/05, Arindam Bhattacharjee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The logs are showing me something like
> [Wed Nov 30 09:04:30 2005] [debug] mod_cache.c(506): cache:
> /images/map/Transport_icon_Air.gif not cached. Reason: HTTP Status 304
> Not Modified
>
> Not sure what it means and what is the rem
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Slive [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 8:15 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod_disk_cache| Struggling to configure
On 11/29/05, Arindam Bhattacharjee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am new to configu
On 11/29/05, Arindam Bhattacharjee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am new to configuring disk cache. Here are the directives I am using.
>
>
>
> #LoadModule disk_cache_module modules/mod_disk_cache.so
>
>
>
> CacheEnable disk /
>
> CacheRoot "/var/ap
> Sounds like a small bug. But it also sounds like it could be fixed
> simply by reversing the order of the two directives in the config
> file.
>
How about this config
CacheDirLevels 11
CacheDirLength 1
Though nobody wouldn't config like that.
> Incidentally, why do you want to fool around
On 11/3/05, Xuekun Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I looked at the source code and unstood why this error was happened
> because when first setting CacheDirLength value, CacheDirLevels wasn't
> be set, and used the default value 3. So 7*3 is higher than 20.
>
> Now in my instance, the DirLength has
21 matches
Mail list logo
