Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV wrote:
That's exactly what I was suggesting.
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Mark McCulligh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 4:08 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SSL Logs and AWStats
Joshua Slive
That's exactly what I was suggesting.
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Mark McCulligh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 4:08 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SSL Logs and AWStats
Joshua Slive wrote:
>On 1/18/06, Mark M
Joshua Slive wrote:
On 1/18/06, Mark McCulligh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was wondering what is the different between TransferLog and
CustomLog. The only difference I can see is that with the TransferLog
you cannot give it a log format or give it any other parameters. If
this is true why
On 1/18/06, Mark McCulligh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was wondering what is the different between TransferLog and
> CustomLog. The only difference I can see is that with the TransferLog
> you cannot give it a log format or give it any other parameters. If
> this is true why use the TransferLo
I was wondering what is the different between TransferLog and
CustomLog. The only difference I can see is that with the TransferLog
you cannot give it a log format or give it any other parameters. If
this is true why use the TransferLog when the CustomLog does the same
thing and has move feat
Your non-SSL virtual host logs to access_log using the "combined" log format
which AWStats parses correctly.
Your SSL virtual host logs to access_log using the "common" format (by default).
Since the "combined" format is parsed correctly, I suggest that you replace the
TransferLog directive in
