Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2.2.3 and load balancing

Sander Temme wrote: On Jun 1, 2008, at 1:05 AM, Eric Bowman wrote: I'm in a situation (RHEL 5.1) where the only "supported" version of Apache is 2.2.3. We are wishing to avail of the session affinity load balancing features in mod_proxy_balancer, and I'm wondering what the general consensus

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2.2.3 and load balancing

On Jun 1, 2008, at 1:05 AM, Eric Bowman wrote: I'm in a situation (RHEL 5.1) where the only "supported" version of Apache is 2.2.3. We are wishing to avail of the session affinity load balancing features in mod_proxy_balancer, and I'm wondering what the general consensus is on how suitabl

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2.2.3 and load balancing

We have been running 2.2.6 in a production environment doing session balancing. It has been working great. Eric Bowman wrote: Hi, I'm in a situation (RHEL 5.1) where the only "supported" version of Apache is 2.2.3. We are wishing to avail of the session affinity load balancing features in

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 - Delayed response

On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 5:01 AM, Clayton Dillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For clarification, it takes about 2 seconds after seeing the connection in > tcpdump before I see the server writing to the access_log. For requests taking 2 seconds that is to be expected. Writing the log entry is the l

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 - Delayed response

Issac, You are right, I should have talked about that in my original post. The server has plenty of hardware resources. He usually runs with 600MB of free memory and he's got two CPU cores. The VM server is also underutilized. Issac Goldstand wrote: > > > Clayton Dillard wrote: >> All, >>

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 - Delayed response

Clayton Dillard wrote: All, Thank you for taking the time to review my question. After a fresh boot (or a reboot) our Apache server returns pages very quickly to the client browser. We are running SugarCRM and the response time is usually around .29 seconds. This high performance lasts

[EMAIL PROTECTED] RE : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 with mod_authn_dbd and pgsql

Hi Dustin, --- Dustin Schuemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > Im trying to use mod_authn_dbd with pgsql my table > structure is 3 > columns username,password,group. When I try to login > into the > protected directory I get a 500 error. My apache > conf is below. My > logs are [Sun Sep 09

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 with mod_authn_dbd and pgsql

On 10/09/2007, Dustin Schuemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Im trying to use mod_authn_dbd with pgsql my table structure is 3 > columns username,password,group. When I try to login into the > protected directory I get a 500 error. My apache conf is below. My > logs are [Sun Sep 09 20:04:05 2007] [

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3: "You don't have permission to access the requested directory" for public_html directories w/o index.html

have fiailed before? Again, thanks, in advance, for your guidance. Charles -Original Message- From: Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 7:36 pm Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3: "You don't have permission to access th

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3: "You don't have permission to access the requested directory" for public_html directories w/o index.html

On 7/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am upgrading Apache from 1.2.6 to 2.2.3. Everything appears to be working except for users' public_html directories without an index.html file. Instead of displaying the files in the directory, the browser displays the following error:

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3: "You don't have permission to access the requested directory" for public_html directories w/o index.html

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 4:26 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3: "You don't have permission to access the requested directory" for public_html directories w/o index.html I am upgrad

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3: "You don't have permission to access the requested directory" for public_html directories w/o index.html

Greetings http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_autoindex.html Have fun. Hamilton Vera int Administrator (char Network[],char ComputationalSystems[]); http://antispam.br/ "Google is my shepherd, no want shall I know" On Fri, 6 Jul 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am upgrading Apache from

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

g on. > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua > Slive > Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 3:24 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 > > On 6/8/07, Kong, Alan wrote: >&g

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

Hi all, I need your help again on error log formatting. My error_log is logging the occurring time on every single line of error message(one error with many lines of error message), below are the sample lines I cut from the error_log. [Tue Jun 12 16:49:00 2007] [error] [client 10.50.166.5] fro

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

On 6/11/07, Kong, Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Joshua, It is working!!! I never pay attention on those commented out items in the conf file. I un-commented them out and rebooted the apache, then it works. Thank you very much. Also thanks for those who are trying to help, appreciated. Gla

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Slive Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 12:16 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 On 6/11/07, Kong, Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Graeme, > > These are the URL that I used: > http://cuflink7

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

On 6/11/07, Kong, Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Graeme, These are the URL that I used: http://cuflink7 http://cuflink7/index.html Cuflink7 is one of the internal server inside the company firewall, the relationship between my workstation and this server is on the same LAN, so I can ping it wi

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

Josh, Fair point. I just wanted to see it for the sake of clarity with the issue. Alan: [1] Is it all images, or just the .gif you cannot access? [2] Do you have the XBit hack switched on? [3] What browser are you using, is it in all browsers that this error occurs? [4] Have you tried manaually

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

Alan -Original Message- From: Graeme Fowler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 11:57 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 11:52 -0400, Kong, Alan wrote: > Here is the error message: > > The page y

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

On 6/11/07, Kong, Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Joshua, Here is the error message: The page you are looking for is currently unavailable. The Web site might be experiencing technical difficulties, or you may need to adjust your browser settings. Ls -la: -rw-r--r-- 1 cuflinkusers

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 11:52 -0400, Kong, Alan wrote: > Here is the error message: > > The page you are looking for is currently unavailable. The Web site > might be experiencing technical difficulties, or you may need to adjust > your browser settings. What *exact* URL are you using when you get

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

Joshua Slive Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 11:47 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 On 6/11/07, Tony Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can you show me an "ls -la", and a copy of your relevant config please? I think you are

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

On 6/11/07, Tony Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can you show me an "ls -la", and a copy of your relevant config please? I think you are pointing him wrong here. The config is probably fine, since apache is giving a 200 (success) status code. But he has never really identified EXACTLY wha

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

not working. > > I have apache1.3.33 in my another server which is working fine. > > > Alan > > > -Original Message- > From: Tony Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 11:37 AM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: RE: [EMAIL P

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

d.apache.org Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 I apologise for wading into this quite late on. But if you are getting an error in your browser then you should be getting an error in your errorlog. Is the gif in the root of the htdocs directory? It's not in /images is it? Can you sho

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

TECTED] > Sent: Mon 6/11/2007 7:50 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Kong, Alan wrote: > > >> Unfortunately, there is no error message. Error

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

Yes, all files are under the DocumentRoot directory. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 10:38 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 Hi, Did you checked whether all the files are

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

-Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua > Slive > Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 3:24 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 > > On 6/8/07, Kong, Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Slive Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 3:24 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 On 6/8/07, Kong, Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi group, I installed apache 2.2.3 in HPUX11.11 and I will be able to access the

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

shua Slive Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 3:24 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 On 6/8/07, Kong, Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi group, > > I installed apache 2.2.3 in HPUX11.11 and I will be able to access the > test index.html(I

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

On 6/8/07, Kong, Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi group, I installed apache 2.2.3 in HPUX11.11 and I will be able to access the test index.html(It works!!!). However, when I try to access the test gif in the same directory, it gives me an error saying that it is not available. I am new for

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

- From: Hiep Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 2:45 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 check/change permission of gif file is one way. On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Kong, Alan wrote: > > Hi group, > > I installed apa

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3

check/change permission of gif file is one way. On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Kong, Alan wrote: Hi group, I installed apache 2.2.3 in HPUX11.11 and I will be able to access the test index.html(It works!!!). However, when I try to access the test gif in the same directory, it gives me an error saying

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 + Logging partial requests

Quoting Joshua Slive ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > See: > http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/Logs/Response_Size Nice. Thanks. % apache2 -l | grep logio mod_logio.c Will work on that then, thanks alot! Regards, Sander. -- | Those who get too big for their britches will be exposed in the end. | 1024D/08CE

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 + Logging partial requests

On 5/29/07, Sander Smeenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello! I'm a happy Apache 2.2.3 user, everything is working just fine, except for this oddity which i'd like to see explained if possible ;-) I recently hosted a large patch to a popular MMORPG on my blog, and as expected, i got tons of hits

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 prefork mpm mod_proxy_ajp

Can anyone tell me which error code would show up when an like the one mentioned in this thread occurs? Would it be 502, or 504? Or something different? Thanks, Chris. Chris Huisman wrote: So has nobody else experienced the same problem? Is this a bug? Should I provide more information?

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 prefork mpm mod_proxy_ajp

So has nobody else experienced the same problem? Is this a bug? Should I provide more information? Where can I find the error codes for proxy ajp? Chris. Chris Huisman wrote: Hello, I'm having a problem with mod_proxy_ajp, I am receiving the following error messages: [Fri Mar 16 11:37:3

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache/2.2.3 on windows not shutting down

Try adding the trailing slash for TortoiseSVN? I'm not familiar with it myself as I use command-line svn client. Sam Carleton wrote: > On 2/1/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> As nobody uses httpd as an application except in brief testing, it has >> relatively little testi

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache/2.2.3 on windows not shutting down

On 2/1/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As nobody uses httpd as an application except in brief testing, it has relatively little testing and review. You can always look at the test framework available via svn from; http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/test/trunk/perl-framew

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache/2.2.3 on windows not shutting down

I have also encountered this problem, but when running Apache as a normal installed web server (as a service). I have tried: net stop apache2.2 It tried stopping the service for some time, but without success. I have also tried httpd -k stop But it doesn't want to shut it down. I have also tr

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache/2.2.3 on windows not shutting down

Sam Carleton wrote: > > httpd -k shutdown > > This should be preferred over pressing Control-C because this lets > Apache end any current operations and clean up gracefully. > > > But it does not work. Does anyone know why? I know it is better to > run it as a service,

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 installation not as root

On 12/29/06, Shweta Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: After building and installing when I try to test: /home/sp/proj/bin/apachectl start I get error: Syntax error on line 117 of /etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl.conf: apachectl might be the culprit here. A couple of things you can do: Go thru the /home

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 installation not as root

Shweta, On Dec 29, 2006, at 7:35 AM, Shweta Patel wrote: ./configure --prefix=/home/sp/proj/ --exec-prefix=/home/sp/proj/ -- with-port=8080 --enable-so --disable-ssl After building and installing when I try to test: /home/sp/proj/bin/ apachectl start I get error: Syntax error on line 117 o

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 installation not as root

There might be no reference to any ssl.conf in the httpd.conf, it may be that the whole conf.d directory is included with something like Include /path/to/conf.d/*.conf Serge Dubrouski wrote: Look into your httpd.conf file. 1. You can have Include ssl.conf or conf/extra/httpd_ssl.conf or some

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 installation not as root

Look into your httpd.conf file. 1. You can have Include ssl.conf or conf/extra/httpd_ssl.conf or some other name (some Linux distros repackage config file) 2. Nothing prevent an admin from putting SSL config into httpd.conf directly in any case READ YOUR HTTPD.CONF file. apachectl is just a si

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 installation not as root

That because in 2.2.3 it's extra/httpd_ssl.conf 1. In that case why is the server even looking into the file /etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl.conf ? 2. When or where in the Server code does it look for ssl.conf ? Basically I'm looking for the initial steps that occur once we call apachectl start Thanks a

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 installation not as root

That because in 2.2.3 it's extra/httpd_ssl.conf On 12/29/06, Shweta Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I do not have the permissions to do so and hence was looking for alternatives. I greped the source for httpd.2.2.3 but could not find an explicit reference to the path "/etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl.con

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 installation not as root

I do not have the permissions to do so and hence was looking for alternatives. I greped the source for httpd.2.2.3 but could not find an explicit reference to the path "/etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl.conf" and was wondering how the server picks up this path since I'm not starting it with ssl support and h

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 installation not as root

Shweta Patel wrote: Syntax error on line 117 of /etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl.conf: SSLCertificateFile: file '/etc/httpd/conf/ssl.crt/server.crt' does not exist or is empty Is there a way for me to solve the problem without switching to as root user? Sure, edit the httpd.conf file and remove the "i

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 as proxy

On 12/21/06, Sriharsha M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have set up Apache HTTP Server 2.2.3 with mod_proxy as a forward proxy on RHEL 4.0 and I am planning to build a filter. In Apache 2.2.3, when I use 'mod_case_filter_in.c' from the experimental modules, I always get r->unparsed_uri, r->uri

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 + Active Directory

> If the initial bind is working then it's probably your LDAP search > criteria which depends on how your AD is layed out. > > This is what I use (I use the AD global catalog (GC)): > > > AuthLDAPURL > "ldap://ad.nos.com:3268/OU=Accounts,DC=nos,DC=com?sAMAccountName?sub?(ob jectClass=*)" > > Yo

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 + Active Directory

On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Dan Nawrocki wrote: > > SSLOptions +StdEnvVars > Options FollowSymLinks > AllowOverride None > > AuthType Basic > AuthBasicProvider ldap > AuthName "auth me!" > AuthLDAPBindDN "bind_username" > AuthLDAPBindPassword bind_password > AuthLDAPURL ldap://host:389

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3: DirectorySlash not allowed here

Tony van der Hoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Yes, but... >> >> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/howto/htaccess.html#what >> > > Thank you for this reference to what an htaccess file is, but, to be honest, > I am at a loss to understand it. Excuse me for the oversimplified answer, as I wrot

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3: DirectorySlash not allowed here

On 16 Dec at 19:18 Ding Deng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Tony van der Hoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm trying to include a DirectorySlash Off in a .htaccess file: > > > > Order allow,deny Allow from all > > > > Options All -ExecCGI #DirectoryIn

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3: DirectorySlash not allowed here

Tony van der Hoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > I'm trying to include a DirectorySlash Off in a .htaccess file: > > Order allow,deny > Allow from all > > Options All -ExecCGI > #DirectoryIndex > DirectorySlash off > > This results in a 500; the entry in the error_log being: > /home/www/htm

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 monitor

I use Zabbix (http://www.zabbix.com) on all my production machines. Hardly any over head and it does a fantastic job (my opinion) of monitoring. It doesn't restore when done (but could) because of the very reasons others have said. If Apache goes down, something is probably not right on the machi

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 monitor

On 12/6/06, Lucuk, Pete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I would like to setup something that would… - test to see is Apache is up or down - if Apache is up, do nothing - if Apache is down, bring it back up ASAP Hi. mon has an http module for check webserver availability:

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 monitor

Apache 2.2.3 monitor- Original Message - From: Lucuk, Pete To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 8:59 AM Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 monitor Hello, I have Apache 2.2.3 with mod_ssl and mod_jk installed and they work like a champ! I am now wrappi

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 monitor

Greetings, On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 08:59 -0500, Lucuk, Pete wrote: > I am now wrapping up my Apache setup with a maintenance in mind. > I would like to setup something that would… > - test to see is Apache is up or down > - if Apache is up, do nothing > - if Apache is down,

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 monitor

Lucuk, Pete wrote: > > I would like to setup something that would… > > - if Apache is down, bring it back up ASAP Uhm - guy I'm not sure you understand how httpd works. Apache has a parent which doesn't ever serve requests. It starts and manages workers. If the workers crash or exit,

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 monitor

> On 12/6/06, Lucuk, Pete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would like to setup something that would… > > > > - test to see is Apache is up or down > > > > - if Apache is up, do nothing > > > > - if Apache is down, bring it back up ASAP There's a monitor hook that runs eve

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 monitor

If application is really critical take a look at http://www.linux-ha.org/ Otherwise a simple cronjon would do. On 12/6/06, Lucuk, Pete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, I have Apache 2.2.3 with mod_ssl and mod_jk installed and they work like a champ! I am now wrapping up my Apache setup w

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 monitor

Hey Pete, Personally, I'd just write and cron a scriptto check to see if the process if running, if not, start it. Scott. Lucuk, Pete wrote: Hello, I have Apache 2.2.3 with mod_ssl and mod_jk installed and they work like a champ! I am now wrapping up my Apache setup with a maintenance i

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 and SUDO

Yvo, I have not been in the habit of using apachectl but starting httpd directly. I will try this how ever and thanks for the idea. Dave. On 11/28/06, Yvo van Doorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You can just edit the apachectl script and add this: LD_LIBRARY_PATH="/path/to/libraries" export

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 and SUDO

You can just edit the apachectl script and add this: LD_LIBRARY_PATH="/path/to/libraries" export LD_LIBRARY_PATH or You can edit /etc/profile and add those two lines. Not sure how compiling apache statically would help (maybe someone else can enlighten me). On 11/28/06, Dave Templeton <[EMAIL P

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 Memory Usage

On 20/11/06, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/20/06, Strader, William A. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well it does seem like mod_perl is a a RAM users... I commented it out and > instead of 120mb RAM it is using 60mb RAM... Any suggestions on what I can > do to make mod_perl not use

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 Memory Usage

@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 Memory Usage On 11/20/06, Strader, William A. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not sure if this is the right place to be asking but I thought I would > try. > > OK I am running Fedora Core 6 with Apache 2.2.3 (installed via yum).

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 Memory Usage

Hey Chris, On Nov 20, 2006, at 7:57 PM, Chris wrote: Hi I use apache 1.3 as well as 2.2.3 so this is off topic since this is for 2.2.3 but I have just noticed my processes use in excess of 100meg per child, I run eaccelerator which I know accounts for some of this 32meg so this would leave arou

Re: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 lots of empty error logs

Hello, I have exactly the same problem... Apache 2.0.58 Windows 2003 Svr PHP 5.0.5 (or 5.1.4) as CGI I have noticed that empty error lines in errorlog are connected with the HTTP result status = 302 Found. I mean every time the script returns the HTTP header with status code 302, new line to

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 and PHP 5.1.6

Thanks, that helped a lot.  I discovered two problems...1.  I'd changed configure, but make install wasn't replacing the old httpd.conf file.  I deleted it, ran make install again and this time noticed a very different httpd.conf file.2.  I went to the LoadModules area and added:LoadModule php5_mod

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 and PHP 5.1.6

Here's what I do (Windows environment)... works fine for me.   LoadModule php5_module "C:\php\php5apache2_2.dll"PHPIniDir "C:/php" AddType application/x-httpd-php .php  AddType application/x-httpd-php-source .phps Bill Angus, MAhttp://www.psychtest.com - Original Message - From:

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 Startup on Suse 10.0??

> > Does ne1 have a recommendation to get Apache 2.2.3 to automatically > > restart on Suse 10.0? > > Why don't you use the /etc/init.d/apache2 file made by SuSe, modify > the various paths and then "insserv -d your_script"? > > >>I apologize for not mentioning it but I compiled Apache. Actuall

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 Startup on Suse 10.0??

Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 Startup on Suse 10.0?? Hi Arthur, > > Does ne1 have a recommendation to get Apache 2.2.3 to automatically > > restart on Suse 10.0? > > Why don't you use the /etc/init.d/apache2 file made by SuSe, modify > the various

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 Startup on Suse 10.0??

Hi Arthur, > Does ne1 have a recommendation to get Apache 2.2.3 to automatically > restart on Suse 10.0? Why don't you use the /etc/init.d/apache2 file made by SuSe, modify the various paths and then "insserv -d your_script"? >>I apologize for not mentioning it but I compiled Apache. Actuall

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 Startup on Suse 10.0??

-Original Message- From: Gaël Lams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 10/24/2006 2:20 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Cc: Subject:Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 Startup on Suse 10.0?? > Does ne1 have a recommendation to get Apache 2.2.3 to automatically > r

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 and 'File Descriptor Limits'

[ Jim Jagielski ] > On Sep 27, 2006, at 9:13 AM, Kenneth Svee wrote: > >> [ Jim Jagielski ] >> >>> Kenneth Svee wrote: I've ported the old config to Apache 2.2, and we're about 11 vhosts over the limit on the new build. The 1.3.37-server works. The 2.2.3-server starts if i comm

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 Startup on Suse 10.0??

Does ne1 have a recommendation to get Apache 2.2.3 to automatically restart on Suse 10.0? Why don't you use the /etc/init.d/apache2 file made by SuSe, modify the various paths and then "insserv -d your_script"? Regards, Gaël

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 lots of empty error logs

I dont think so, because when I use Apache 2.0.52 but keep all of my CGIs the same, this issue disappears. It must be something with apache itself. thanks, stan Steve Swift wrote: One possibility is that one of your CGI's is writing a null line to STDERR. Can you correlate the times in the

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 CGI OS 5 Issue under load

> -Original Message- > From: Stan Kaushanskiy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 6:26 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 CGI OS 5 Issue under load > > Boyle Owen wrote: > >> -O

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 CGI OS 5 Issue under load

Boyle Owen wrote: -Original Message- From: Stan Kaushanskiy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 9:16 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 CGI OS 5 Issue under load Hi All, I am running a cgi program through Apache 2.2.3. Usua

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 CGI OS 5 Issue under load

> -Original Message- > From: Stan Kaushanskiy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 9:16 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 CGI OS 5 Issue under load > > Hi All, > > I am running a cgi program through Apache 2.2.3. Usually

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 lots of empty error logs

One possibility is that one of your CGI's is writing a null line to STDERR.  Can you correlate the times in the error log with the times in the access log to work out the culprit?It might not be your code that is generating the STDERR - I once had a system call that generated a line on stderr even

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 and 'File Descriptor Limits'

The SLACK_LINE stuff was about preserving low-numbered fds for use by stdio because of the Solaris 8-bit fd limit with stdio. It's not in 2.x because 2.x doesn't use stdio for logging. If you're hitting fd limits in 2.2 it is only because of kernel fd limits which need fixing with limit/ulimit

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 and 'File Descriptor Limits'

On Sep 27, 2006, at 9:13 AM, Kenneth Svee wrote: [ Jim Jagielski ] Kenneth Svee wrote: I've ported the old config to Apache 2.2, and we're about 11 vhosts over the limit on the new build. The 1.3.37-server works. The 2.2.3-server starts if i comment out 11 vhosts. With 10 vhosts commented o

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 and 'File Descriptor Limits'

[ Jim Jagielski ] > Kenneth Svee wrote: >> >> I've ported the old config to Apache 2.2, and we're about 11 vhosts >> over the limit on the new build. The 1.3.37-server works. The >> 2.2.3-server starts if i comment out 11 vhosts. With 10 vhosts >> commented out, the server dumps this to the "glob

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 and 'File Descriptor Limits'

Kenneth Svee wrote: > > I've ported the old config to Apache 2.2, and we're about 11 vhosts > over the limit on the new build. The 1.3.37-server works. The > 2.2.3-server starts if i comment out 11 vhosts. With 10 vhosts > commented out, the server dumps this to the "global" error_log, and > dies:

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 on Redhat AS4 instable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello, the following problems I wrote yesterday has been partly resolved now: > I've installed Apache 2.2.3 on a Redhat Advanced Server 4 (with all > updates installed). You can look at the configuration log at > . >

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 and MySQL 5.0.24a

Haha.. Yes. that is what happened with me - a rebuild and weirdness - the thing works. But I'm not happy. I want to know why it works. I am responsible for a set of production servers, and I don't like the 'randomness' - it's far too much like dark magic. I've been trying to get another s

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 and MySQL 5.0.24a

Ben wrote: > Rob, (Nick) Hi Ben, I made all changes to the files as suggested, but... WTF is going on..? I'm not getting any errors anymore...!! DBD-MySQL auth is working! ^$%$# (Which is of course a Good Thing but now I don't know what error I would have had.) I'm stu

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 and MySQL 5.0.24a

Rob, (Nick) I have been looking a little more at the issue of returning meaningful error messages back to apache - i didn't like my previous mail's hijacking of apache as a solution - though it should provide an idea of what is going on. So now the implementation looks like. Rob, sorry - t

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 and MySQL 5.0.24a

On Fri, September 8, 2006 15:11, Ben wrote: > Rob, Ganesh > > > I think that Ganesh was confusing perl DBD for apr-DBD. > We don't use Perl on our systems. I guess so.. No hard feelings. :-) > Rob, as you correctly guessed, I didn't do something different from > the first build. However I was pr

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 and MySQL 5.0.24a

Rob, Ganesh I think that Ganesh was confusing perl DBD for apr-DBD. We don't use Perl on our systems. Rob, as you correctly guessed, I didn't do something different from the first build. However I was pretty surprised that it built and worked the second time round - my guess is that there w

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 and MySQL 5.0.24a

ganesh ganesh wrote: > Also check with the following perl module presence: > > DBD::mysql, Bundle::DBD::mysql, Bundle::DBI, DBI, DBI::DBD It worked before without all those Perl modules. Can you explain why I need Perl modules to get Apache, APR-DBD and MySQL working n

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 and MySQL 5.0.24a

Also check with the following perl module presence:DBD::mysql, Bundle::DBD::mysql, Bundle::DBI, DBI, DBI::DBDOn 9/8/06, ganesh ganesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi,    Some of this may sound basic.. but check and post back if the problem still persists...1. Does the mysql.sock present as you h

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 and MySQL 5.0.24a

Hi,    Some of this may sound basic.. but check and post back if the problem still persists...1. Does the mysql.sock present as you have porivided in my.cnf?2. Do you have the following Perl Modules:  DBD::MaxDB & Apache::DBI 3. Do you have configured your php with the --with-mysql if you use m

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 and MySQL 5.0.24a

I include a step-by-step install of A223/Mysql 5024 with DBD in the articles called: "A NetHack-esque Journey of the dark arts for DBD(mysql) under httpd-2.2.3" - posted 20 August on this maillist - it may be relevant or interesting to you. ---

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 - Virtual Host

On 8/31/06, Evaggelos Balaskas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi to all, i want only for a specific virtual host to give the authority to one user - group . in apache 1.3.x was User - Group Directive [0] in apache 2.0.x wan't support User-Group in VH [1] and was (is) the AssignUserId [2] Is there

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 for Windows compile - DLL search order - help needed

Nick Kew wrote: > On Sunday 13 August 2006 17:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Can sombody help me to set up Apache to load dlls of Oracle? > > Apache will need ORACLE_BASE in its environment. On *X we just set that in > apachectl. I don't know what a windoze equivalent looks like. Similar; you

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 for Windows compile - DLL search order - help needed

On Sunday 13 August 2006 17:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, Please fix your mailer! > Can sombody help me to set up Apache to load dlls of Oracle? Apache will need ORACLE_BASE in its environment. On *X we just set that in apachectl. I don't know what a windoze equivalent looks like. -- Ni

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 for Windows compile - DLL search order - help needed

TED]> 08/12/2006 22:08 AST Please respond to users@httpd.apache.org To   users@httpd.apache.org cc   bcc   Subject   Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 for Windows compile On 8/12/06, Robert Ionescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> hunter wrote:> > I will provide details

  1   2   >