AW: AW: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Too many open files ...
>
>
> It was thus said that the Great Oliver Kirchel once stated:
> >
> > Hi Sean,
> > I have good news and bad news.
> > First, the good news - it works now.
> > The bad news are that I get now in my error.log t
It was thus said that the Great Oliver Kirchel once stated:
>
> Hi Sean,
> I have good news and bad news.
> First, the good news - it works now.
> The bad news are that I get now in my error.log this message:
>
> [Wed Aug 3 02:50:03 2005] [warn] send body: filedescriptor (1031)
> larger than FD_
FD_SETSIZE
As I can see it is a warning. Do I have to worry about it ?
Olli
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Oliver Kirchel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Montag, 1. August 2005 10:40
> An: users@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: AW: AW: AW: AW: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Too
eff: Re: AW: AW: AW: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Too many open files ...
>
>
> It was thus said that the Great Oliver Kirchel once stated:
> >
> > Hi Sean,
> > I put it into /etc/init.d/apache2.
> > How can I control if the ulimit is now 2048.
> > If I do "
It was thus said that the Great Oliver Kirchel once stated:
>
> Hi Sean,
> I put it into /etc/init.d/apache2.
> How can I control if the ulimit is now 2048.
> If I do "ulimit -n" after restarting the apache it still shows 1024.
Yes, that's expected, but I'm not sure if I can explain why in less
uli 2005 19:18
> An: users@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Too many open files ...
>
>
> It was thus said that the Great Oliver Kirchel once stated:
> >
> > Hi,
> > how can I raise the files per process. If I do "umilit -n" it sho
It was thus said that the Great Oliver Kirchel once stated:
>
> Hi,
> how can I raise the files per process. If I do "umilit -n" it shows
> 1024. Maybe its to less.
You give "ulimit -n" a value, like "ulimit -n 2048". What I did was I
found the startup script (usually something like "/etc/init
; Betreff: Re: AW: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Too many open files ...
>
>
> It was thus said that the Great Oliver Kirchel once stated:
> >
> > Hi,
> > if I do this "more /proc/sys/fs/file-max" I get the value
> 104857. With
> > the command /proc/sys/fs/file-nr
It was thus said that the Great Oliver Kirchel once stated:
>
> Hi,
> if I do this "more /proc/sys/fs/file-max" I get the value 104857. With
> the command /proc/sys/fs/file-nr I get these values: 3744 1184 104857
> I checked these values the last twelve hours. The file numbers never
> reach the ma
Hi,
if I do this "more /proc/sys/fs/file-max" I get the value 104857. With
the command /proc/sys/fs/file-nr I get these values: 3744 1184 104857
I checked these values the last twelve hours. The file numbers never
reach the maximum.
Olli
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Boyle Owen [mail
10 matches
Mail list logo
