On 16 August 2017 at 13:54, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 8:50 AM, mike _ wrote:
>
>> Could it be that ocsp.usertrust.com pre-produced a response for my
>> certificate at "Aug 16 00:58:00 2017 GMT" and is handing that out to
>> my instance of httpd?
>
> That's what I suspect. You
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 8:50 AM, mike _ wrote:
> Could it be that ocsp.usertrust.com pre-produced a response for my
> certificate at "Aug 16 00:58:00 2017 GMT" and is handing that out to
> my instance of httpd?
That's what I suspect. You could put a packet capture between Apache
and the OCSP ser
On 15 August 2017 at 17:56, Eric Covener wrote:
>> When a configuration value is set to shmcb:/path/to/datafile should
>> datafile exist in the filesystem?
>
> This module always tries to use anonymous shared memory first, and
> only uses the provided path if anonymous doesn't work.
Ah, OK. Thank
> When a configuration value is set to shmcb:/path/to/datafile should
> datafile exist in the filesystem?
This module always tries to use anonymous shared memory first, and
only uses the provided path if anonymous doesn't work.
-
I've enabled OCSP Stapling and it seems to be working, but I'm puzzled
that the file specified in SSLStaplingCache directive doesn't exist. I
see that the file specified for SSLSessionCache, which I didn't set,
doesn't exist either.
When a configuration value is set to shmcb:/path/to/datafile shou
