Re: [users@httpd] mod_proxy nofailover parameter.

2016-07-16 Thread dE
I'll come back to this later. On 07/15/16 22:25, Daniel wrote: Failover is what you described, nofailover is for the opposite El 15 jul. 2016 3:27 p. m., "dE" > escribió: Hi, What I understand of nofailover is that in case a client is fetching fr

Re: [users@httpd] mod_proxy nofailover parameter.

2016-07-15 Thread Daniel
Failover is what you described, nofailover is for the opposite El 15 jul. 2016 3:27 p. m., "dE" escribió: > Hi, > > What I understand of nofailover is that in case a client is fetching > from this proxy and the origin server goes to an error or disabled state, a > reset packet won't be sent t

[users@httpd] mod_proxy nofailover parameter.

2016-07-15 Thread dE
Hi, What I understand of nofailover is that in case a client is fetching from this proxy and the origin server goes to an error or disabled state, a reset packet won't be sent to the client, instead the backend will be changed and the client will continue the operation uninterrupted. Bu