Re: [users@httpd] concerns about requirements for Apache 2.4.6 release

2013-07-30 Thread Rainer Jung
On 30.07.2013 16:13, Dennis Clarke wrote: > Not to be a completely obsessive compulsive nit pick, but being OCD > helps greatly when writing software. Any chance we could fix the > typo? > > - Higher performant shm-based cache implementation > > Probably should be "performance" there. > > dc

Re: [users@httpd] concerns about requirements for Apache 2.4.6 release

2013-07-30 Thread Dennis Clarke
On 30/07/13 07:46 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: On 30.07.2013 10:27, Rainer Jung wrote: On 30.07.2013 05:08, Dennis Clarke wrote: I'm a bit confused about the requirements for Apache 2.4.6. This page seems very clear : http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.4.html There is states that

Re: [users@httpd] concerns about requirements for Apache 2.4.6 release

2013-07-30 Thread Rainer Jung
On 30.07.2013 10:27, Rainer Jung wrote: > On 30.07.2013 05:08, Dennis Clarke wrote: >> >> I'm a bit confused about the requirements for Apache 2.4.6. This page >> seems >> very clear : >> >> http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.4.html >> >> There is states that "This release requires

Re: [users@httpd] concerns about requirements for Apache 2.4.6 release

2013-07-30 Thread Rainer Jung
On 30.07.2013 05:08, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > I'm a bit confused about the requirements for Apache 2.4.6. This page > seems > very clear : > > http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.4.html > > There is states that "This release requires the Apache Portable Runtime > (APR) > version

[users@httpd] concerns about requirements for Apache 2.4.6 release

2013-07-29 Thread Dennis Clarke
I'm a bit confused about the requirements for Apache 2.4.6. This page seems very clear : http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.4.html There is states that "This release requires the Apache Portable Runtime (APR) version 1.4.x and APR-Util version 1.4.x" The page for the Apache