Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.4 includes vi .swp files

2017-05-11 Thread Luca Toscano
2017-05-09 11:40 GMT+02:00 Nick Kew : > > > But i wonder if apache should basically tries to include a file > > "beginning with dot"/"ending with swp" which generelly indicates a > > temporary/hidden file. > > Once you start excluding files by convention (which may be > entirely different and inap

Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.4 includes vi .swp files

2017-05-09 Thread Nick Kew
On Tue, 9 May 2017 10:19:06 +0200 Hajo Locke wrote: > Include /etc/apache2/conf.d/ Is this usage suggested or documented anywhere? If it is then I would be inclined to agree, that's a gotcha that should be noted in the docs. > A quick fix could be to include only *.conf files: > > Include /e

[users@httpd] apache 2.4 includes vi .swp files

2017-05-09 Thread Hajo Locke
Hello, found an interesting difference between include behaviour of apache 2.2 and 2.4 Have an include in apache2.conf: Include /etc/apache2/conf.d/ When editing a conf file in this folder by vi, vi creates a new swp file. lets say i edit a file logging.conf, so vi creates a file .logging.co