I did, and it worked. I just don't know if it will server the other
domain yet. Waiting for DNS catch-up.
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 11:02:13 -0600, you wrote:
>What happens if you omit the NameVirtualHost directive?
>
>On 11/06/2014 10:56 AM, Steve Matzura wrote:
>> On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 10:30:32 -0600,
What happens if you omit the NameVirtualHost directive?
On 11/06/2014 10:56 AM, Steve Matzura wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 10:30:32 -0600, you wrote:
>
>> Try giving NameVirtualHost 0.0.0.0:80 or the actual ip:80. Not sure if
>> it will change anything, but its worth the 10 seconds it will take t
I got to thinking, if I have a mismatch, what if I remove the
NameVirtualHost line? I did, and the error went away. Now I have to
test it to see that the second domain will be server by name.
On Thu, 6 Nov 2014 11:33:42 -0500, you wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Steve Matzura wrote:
>>>
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 10:30:32 -0600, you wrote:
>Try giving NameVirtualHost 0.0.0.0:80 or the actual ip:80. Not sure if
>it will change anything, but its worth the 10 seconds it will take to
>implement.
Sorry, same error, just substituting * with either 0.0.0.0 or the
actual address.
---
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 11:22:00 -0500, you wrote:
>On Thu, 6 Nov 2014 11:06:06 -0500, you wrote:
>
>>On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Steve Matzura wrote:
>>> NameVirtualHost *:80
>>
>>
>>You probably have two or more of these, you only want 1.
>
>How does that jibe with the article saying I need a
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Steve Matzura wrote:
>>You probably have two or more of these, you only want 1.
>
> How does that jibe with the article saying I need a block for each
> domain?
It's a 1:n relationship betwen NameVirtualHost X and .
---
Try giving NameVirtualHost 0.0.0.0:80 or the actual ip:80. Not sure if
it will change anything, but its worth the 10 seconds it will take to
implement.
On 11/06/2014 10:21 AM, Steve Matzura wrote:
> Once again, domains and addresses are obfuscated. 'xxx' refers to the
> actual node name of the sy
Once again, domains and addresses are obfuscated. 'xxx' refers to the
actual node name of the system about which we're talking. Here you go:
[Thu Nov 06 16:11:08 2014] [warn] NameVirtualHost *:80 has no
VirtualHosts
VirtualHost configuration:
[2001:4b98:dc0:41:216:3eff:fe18:db3b]:80 domain1.com
(/
On Thu, 6 Nov 2014 11:06:06 -0500, you wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Steve Matzura wrote:
>> NameVirtualHost *:80
>
>
>You probably have two or more of these, you only want 1.
How does that jibe with the article saying I need a block for each
domain?
-
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Steve Matzura wrote:
> NameVirtualHost *:80
You probably have two or more of these, you only want 1.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
try this to test your virtual host config.
#apache2ctl -S
On 11/06/2014 09:43 AM, Steve Matzura wrote:
> When restarting the server with 'apache2ctl restart', or when using
> the -t option to check the syntax of files, I get the following after
> the current date-and-time stamp:
>
> [warn] NameVi
When restarting the server with 'apache2ctl restart', or when using
the -t option to check the syntax of files, I get the following after
the current date-and-time stamp:
[warn] NameVirtualHost *:80 has no VirtualHosts
Before I added anything to httpd.conf, it was empty--a 0-length
file--which I
12 matches
Mail list logo
