RE: [users@httpd] Missing User-Agent:

2005-06-17 Thread Michael D. Berger
Thanks for your suggestion. I caught the packets with tethereal and found the problem: I was addressed by IP address rather than URL. I reject these, especially since I use dynamic dns. In addition, the messages are buffer oferflow attacks. I address another issue with these in a message I jus

RE: [users@httpd] Missing User-Agent:

2005-06-11 Thread herauthon
compare yours with mine - and tell me if the fixed version would work. At 04:11 8-6-2005, you wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Joshua Slive [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2005 9:52 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Missing User-Agent

Re: [users@httpd] Missing User-Agent:

2005-06-08 Thread Joshua Slive
On 6/7/05, Michael D. Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am using the configuration supplied with RH-E-W-3, with a few changes, > inclusing a virtual host and blocking of directory listing. As you can > see from the log lines below, the block of directory listing is involved. > It is as if w

RE: [users@httpd] Missing User-Agent:

2005-06-07 Thread Michael D. Berger
> -Original Message- > From: Joshua Slive [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2005 9:52 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Missing User-Agent: > > > On 6/5/05, Michael D. Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 6/4/05, Michael D. Berger <[E

Re: [users@httpd] Missing User-Agent:

2005-06-05 Thread Joshua Slive
On 6/5/05, Michael D. Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 6/4/05, Michael D. Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I notice that Apache 2.0 rejects, with a 403, > > > a GET that does not have a User-Agent header, > > > and I to get some of these. > > > > > > Why do I get them? > > > Why are

RE: [users@httpd] Missing User-Agent:

2005-06-05 Thread Michael D. Berger
> -Original Message- > From: Joshua Slive [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2005 12:03 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Missing User-Agent: > > > On 6/4/05, Michael D. Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I notice that Apache 2.0 rejects,

Re: [users@httpd] Missing User-Agent:

2005-06-05 Thread Joshua Slive
On 6/4/05, Michael D. Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I notice that Apache 2.0 rejects, with a 403, > a GET that does not have a User-Agent header, > and I to get some of these. > > Why do I get them? > Why are they rejected? Apache 2 certainly does not do this by default. There must be some

[users@httpd] Missing User-Agent:

2005-06-04 Thread Michael D. Berger
I notice that Apache 2.0 rejects, with a 403, a GET that does not have a User-Agent header, and I to get some of these. Why do I get them? Why are they rejected? Thanks, Mike -- Michael D. Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The offic