Re: [users@httpd] High availabilty through Apache httpd

2012-02-06 Thread Igor Cicimov
ke a look at the SRV record for DNS ( >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SRV_record) and pray for the browser to >> support it. >> >> ** ** >> >> ** ** >> >> ** ** >> >> *From:* Harsimranjit singh Kler [mailto:simran...@gmail.c

Re: [users@httpd] High availabilty through Apache httpd

2012-02-06 Thread Harsimranjit singh Kler
gt; You can also take a look at the SRV record for DNS ( > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SRV_record) and pray for the browser to > support it. > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* Harsimranjit singh Kler [mailto:simran...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Monday 6 Fe

RE: [users@httpd] High availabilty through Apache httpd

2012-02-06 Thread DENIS Laurent
link: http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/rhel-centos-fedora-keepalived-lvs-cluster-c onfiguration/ From: Harsimranjit singh Kler [mailto:simran...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday 6 February 2012 10:53 To: DENIS Laurent Cc: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [users@httpd] High availabilt

Re: [users@httpd] High availabilty through Apache httpd

2012-02-06 Thread Eric Covener
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 5:46 AM, Harsimranjit singh Kler wrote: > Thanks for details. > > One last question > > Why Apache not Support failover support which is basic for any load balancer > setup ? > It's a webserver. If you want a load balancer, put a load balancer in front of it.

Re: [users@httpd] High availabilty through Apache httpd

2012-02-06 Thread Harsimranjit singh Kler
mran...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Monday 6 February 2012 10:53 > *To:* DENIS Laurent > *Cc:* users@httpd.apache.org > > *Subject:* Re: [users@httpd] High availabilty through Apache httpd > > ** ** > > Intially i want failover setup only with two node > > > &

RE: [users@httpd] High availabilty through Apache httpd

2012-02-06 Thread DENIS Laurent
clustering. From: Jaco Kroon [mailto:j...@uls.co.za] Sent: Monday 6 February 2012 10:24 To: users@httpd.apache.org Cc: Harsimranjit singh Kler Subject: Re: [users@httpd] High availabilty through Apache httpd Not that I'm aware of but someone else on the list may very well know somethi

Re: [users@httpd] High availabilty through Apache httpd

2012-02-06 Thread Harsimranjit singh Kler
m if > you don’t use tomcat clustering. > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* Jaco Kroon [mailto:j...@uls.co.za] > *Sent:* Monday 6 February 2012 10:24 > *To:* users@httpd.apache.org > *Cc:* Harsimranjit singh Kler > *Subject:* Re: [users@httpd] High availabilty thro

RE: [users@httpd] High availabilty through Apache httpd

2012-02-06 Thread DENIS Laurent
don't use tomcat clustering. From: Jaco Kroon [mailto:j...@uls.co.za] Sent: Monday 6 February 2012 10:24 To: users@httpd.apache.org Cc: Harsimranjit singh Kler Subject: Re: [users@httpd] High availabilty through Apache httpd Not that I'm aware of but someone else on the lis

Re: [users@httpd] High availabilty through Apache httpd

2012-02-06 Thread Jaco Kroon
Not that I'm aware of but someone else on the list may very well know something I don't. May I inquire as to why not? Kind Regards, Jaco On 06/02/12 11:17, Harsimranjit singh Kler wrote: Its is not possible for me to use "haproxy" in my setup. Is there alternate to use with Apache only?

Re: [users@httpd] High availabilty through Apache httpd

2012-02-06 Thread Harsimranjit singh Kler
Its is not possible for me to use "haproxy" in my setup. Is there alternate to use with Apache only? On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Jaco Kroon wrote: > Hi, > > Perhaps look at "haproxy" instead of apache. Run it on two or more > machines with multiple IPs and have then distribute the load to

Re: [users@httpd] High availabilty through Apache httpd

2012-02-06 Thread Jaco Kroon
Hi, Perhaps look at "haproxy" instead of apache. Run it on two or more machines with multiple IPs and have then distribute the load to your Tomcat worker nodes. Kind Regards, Jaco On 06/02/12 11:09, Harsimranjit singh Kler wrote: Hi How i can make apache httpd High Available(HA)?.If i want