Re: [users@httpd] Configuration help - addhandler <> mod_proxy_fcgi

2018-08-17 Thread Hajo Locke
Hello, Am 08.03.2018 um 08:54 schrieb Hajo Locke: Hello, Am 11.09.2017 um 14:58 schrieb Eric Covener: On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 4:28 AM, Hajo Locke wrote: Hello List, currently i use classic mod_fastcgi (fastcgiexternalserver) with php-fpm, which is quite reliable. A disadvantage of this set

Re: [users@httpd] Configuration help - addhandler <> mod_proxy_fcgi

2018-03-07 Thread Hajo Locke
Hello, Am 11.09.2017 um 14:58 schrieb Eric Covener: On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 4:28 AM, Hajo Locke wrote: Hello List, currently i use classic mod_fastcgi (fastcgiexternalserver) with php-fpm, which is quite reliable. A disadvantage of this setup is, that not every response-header set by .htacces

Re: [users@httpd] Configuration help - addhandler <> mod_proxy_fcgi

2017-09-11 Thread Hajo Locke
Hello, Am 11.09.2017 um 14:58 schrieb Eric Covener: On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 4:28 AM, Hajo Locke wrote: Hello List, currently i use classic mod_fastcgi (fastcgiexternalserver) with php-fpm, which is quite reliable. A disadvantage of this setup is, that not every response-header set by .htacces

Re: [users@httpd] Configuration help - addhandler <> mod_proxy_fcgi

2017-09-11 Thread Eric Covener
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 4:28 AM, Hajo Locke wrote: > Hello List, > > currently i use classic mod_fastcgi (fastcgiexternalserver) with php-fpm, > which is quite reliable. > A disadvantage of this setup is, that not every response-header set by > .htaccess will really send to client. > Something lik

[users@httpd] Configuration help - addhandler <> mod_proxy_fcgi

2017-09-11 Thread Hajo Locke
Hello List, currently i use classic mod_fastcgi (fastcgiexternalserver) with php-fpm, which is quite reliable. A disadvantage of this setup is, that not every response-header set by .htaccess will really send to client. Something like this is the current setup:     AddHandler myphp-cgi .php