Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.4.1 third party dependencies

2012-03-05 Thread Andy Wang
On 03/03/2012 06:51 PM, Sander Temme wrote: > On Mar 2, 2012, at 2:28 PM, Andy Wang wrote: > >> 've been following the various changes with Apache 2.4.x (and 2.3.x during >> development regarding the removal of apr/apr-util and pcre from the Apache >> source bundle and noted that: >> http://httpd

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.4.1 third party dependencies

2012-03-03 Thread Sander Temme
On Mar 2, 2012, at 2:28 PM, Andy Wang wrote: > 've been following the various changes with Apache 2.4.x (and 2.3.x during > development regarding the removal of apr/apr-util and pcre from the Apache > source bundle and noted that: > http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/install.html > > says nothin

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.4.1 third party dependencies

2012-03-03 Thread Rainer Jung
On 02.03.2012 23:28, Andy Wang wrote: I've been following the various changes with Apache 2.4.x (and 2.3.x during development regarding the removal of apr/apr-util and pcre from the Apache source bundle and noted that: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/install.html says nothing about PCRE as a re

[users@httpd] Apache 2.4.1 third party dependencies

2012-03-02 Thread Andy Wang
I've been following the various changes with Apache 2.4.x (and 2.3.x during development regarding the removal of apr/apr-util and pcre from the Apache source bundle and noted that: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/install.html says nothing about PCRE as a requirement, but the default configure opt