Thanks for the replies.
Yes, I decided to go with mod_jk rather than mod_proxy because there
is more experience with mod_jk at our company. I've now got the system
nearly fully configured for ssh, failover, etc.
Thanks for the notes on jkmanager. I've also got that working as well.
Very happy wit
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> On 8/31/2012 6:08 PM, Ed Young wrote:
>
> I now need to get the urls for the /admin/jkmanager or
> /balancer-manager working. Currently they are yielding 404.
>
>
> I didn't see this in your configuration, but you have to enable the
> balan
On 8/31/2012 6:08 PM, Ed Young wrote:
> I now need to get the urls for the /admin/jkmanager or
> /balancer-manager working. Currently they are yielding 404.
I didn't see this in your configuration, but you have to enable the
balancer manager explicitly:
SetHandler balancer-manager
On Aug 31, 2012, at 11:37 AM, Ed Young wrote:
>
> My understanding is that mod_proxy replaces mod_jk, but i haven't had
> any success getting mod_proxy to work in a failover scenario, so I may
> be stuck for now.
>
mod_proxy's failover works fine... what problems are you seeing?
What version
Yes, I realized I put the jk_module descriptor in the wrong file
seconds after I sent this off.
I've now gotten failover working the way I need it to so thanks for the help.
I now need to get the urls for the /admin/jkmanager or
/balancer-manager working. Currently they are yielding 404.
Thanks
On Sep 1, 2012 2:23 AM, "Ed Young" wrote:
>
> Thanks again for the reply. I believe the cluster descriptor in
> httpd.conf describes the tomcat cluster, no? See below.
>
> I was able to install httpd-devel by hand and build and install
> mod_jk, so I'm ready to take a shot at configuring cluster f
Thanks again for the reply. I believe the cluster descriptor in
httpd.conf describes the tomcat cluster, no? See below.
I was able to install httpd-devel by hand and build and install
mod_jk, so I'm ready to take a shot at configuring cluster failover
using mod_jk.
I've added the jk_module descri
On Sep 1, 2012 1:38 AM, "Ed Young" wrote:
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Igor Cicimov wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Ed Young wrote:
> >>
> >> I've set up a load balancing configuration based on an Apache server
> >> and two tomcats Tomcat6A, and To
Thanks for the reply.
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Igor Cicimov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Ed Young wrote:
>>
>> I've set up a load balancing configuration based on an Apache server
>> and two tomcats Tomcat6A, and Tomcat6B. I'm trying to set it up so
>> that Tomcat6B is a f
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Ed Young wrote:
> I've set up a load balancing configuration based on an Apache server
> and two tomcats Tomcat6A, and Tomcat6B. I'm trying to set it up so
> that Tomcat6B is a failover server, so if Tomcat6A goes down, Tomcat6B
> will handle all subsequent reque
: Ed Young [mailto:e...@summitbid.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 9:14 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [users@httpd] Apache + 2 tomcat appserver failover configuration
I've set up a load balancing configuration based on an Apache server
and two tomcats Tomcat6A, and Tomcat6B. I
On Aug 31, 2012 11:14 AM, "Ed Young" wrote:
>
> I've set up a load balancing configuration based on an Apache server
> and two tomcats Tomcat6A, and Tomcat6B. I'm trying to set it up so
> that Tomcat6B is a failover server, so if Tomcat6A goes down, Tomcat6B
> will handle all subsequent requests.
I've set up a load balancing configuration based on an Apache server
and two tomcats Tomcat6A, and Tomcat6B. I'm trying to set it up so
that Tomcat6B is a failover server, so if Tomcat6A goes down, Tomcat6B
will handle all subsequent requests.
I have two questions:
1. Does mod_proxy use the worker
13 matches
Mail list logo
