On 2/21/2010 12:07 PM, Paul McFerrin wrote:
> I gave up on Xampp as a web server. Too many problems with not having
> symbolic links. Went and got Apache version 2.0.63 and I'm trying to
> port it to Cygwin.
That's a really foolish idea, since the httpd security model depends upon
a case sensiti
On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 13:07 -0500, Paul McFerrin wrote:
> I gave up on Xampp as a web server. Too many problems with not having
> symbolic links. Went and got Apache version 2.0.63 and I'm trying to
> port it to Cygwin. The code compiles cleanly but it just don't want to
> start up. The only
I gave up on Xampp as a web server. Too many problems with not having
symbolic links. Went and got Apache version 2.0.63 and I'm trying to
port it to Cygwin. The code compiles cleanly but it just don't want to
start up. The only thing in the error_log file is a complaint about the
PID file
You do realize Xampp is a test and development package and not designed for a
"production" environment correct?
Thanks,
Brent Davidson
This particular version of Apache is part of the XAMPP Package which is
a COMPLETE Package containing: Apache, MySQL, Filezilla, Mercury, PHP, &
Tomcat; all in
On 19 Feb 2010, at 06:07, Paul McFerrin wrote
> htttp://genealogy.mcferrin.org == Page display's normally
> http://genealogy.mcferrin.org/barrows.htm == Page displays "Object not found"
> message, but is there!!
> http://genealogy.mcferrin.org/McFerrin_CD == Directory containing
> "index.html",
This particular version of Apache is part of the XAMPP Package which is
a COMPLETE Package containing: Apache, MySQL, Filezilla, Mercury, PHP, &
Tomcat; all in one package for the PC. I have a lot to lose if I can't
get Apache working to my liking. Something is missing in the httpd.conf
file
