On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 11:23 PM, J. Greenlees
wrote:
> Eric Covener wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 9:50 AM, King Holger (CI/AFP2)
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Apache2 group,
>>>
>>> is there a possibility to use JUST one VirtualHost for accessing it via HTTP
>>> and HTTPS.
>>
>> No.
>>
> not even if it i
Eric Covener wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 9:50 AM, King Holger (CI/AFP2)
> wrote:
>> Hi Apache2 group,
>>
>> is there a possibility to use JUST one VirtualHost for accessing it via HTTP
>> and HTTPS.
>
> No.
>
not even if it is ipbased vhost rather than name based?
ipbase vhost being the bet
Le Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:50:31 +0100,
"King Holger (CI/AFP2)" a écrit :
> Hi Apache2 group,
>
> is there a possibility to use JUST one VirtualHost for accessing it via HTTP
> and HTTPS.
> To my understanding, this is not possible because "SSLEngine on" just forces
> the HTTP-
> access to work ju
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 9:50 AM, King Holger (CI/AFP2)
wrote:
> Hi Apache2 group,
>
> is there a possibility to use JUST one VirtualHost for accessing it via HTTP
> and HTTPS.
No.
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com
-
The offici
Hi Apache2 group,
is there a possibility to use JUST one VirtualHost for accessing it via HTTP
and HTTPS.
To my understanding, this is not possible because "SSLEngine on" just forces
the HTTP-
access to work just with HTTPS:
NameVirtualHost *:80
NameVirtualHost *:443
...
SSLEngine on