Re: [us...@httpd] Apache module that enables ActiveX

2010-04-23 Thread Mauri
many thanks jonas for your suggest. This is a part of my conf. Is it correct? [...] KeepAlive On ProxyRequests off ProxyPass / http://10.173.90.171/ ProxyHTMLURLMap http://10.173.90.171 / ProxyPassReverse http://10.173.90.171/ ProxyHTMLEnable On ProxyHTMLURLMap / /

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache module that enables ActiveX

2010-04-22 Thread Jonas Eckerman
On 2010-04-22 16:56, Mauri wrote: [quote]Do you want the connection between the proxy and the server to be kept alive rather than closed after each reqest?[quote] yes. just this? KeepAlive Off in the No. That turns off keepalive between the browser and the proxy. In order to turn on keepaliv

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache module that enables ActiveX

2010-04-22 Thread Mauri
[quote]Do you want the connection between the proxy and the server to be kept alive rather than closed after each reqest?[quote] yes. just this? KeepAlive Off in the thanks for the suggest. cheers, Mauri 2010/4/22 Jonas Eckerman > On 2010-04-21 15:28, Mauri wrote: > > a question about my pr

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache module that enables ActiveX

2010-04-22 Thread Jonas Eckerman
On 2010-04-21 15:28, Mauri wrote: a question about my previous problem. What previous problem? And what on earth does this have to do with enabling ActiveX? Scenario A) All request from my i.e. to web server go troughput this 2 sessions. I don't see any other connection. Scenario B) All

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache module that enables ActiveX

2010-04-22 Thread Hendrik Schmieder
Mauri schrieb: Eric, I'm very sorry for the new thread but I'm no able to reply to original thread. As per the previous mail, I have this error, always! (by 2 days): "Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provid

[us...@httpd] Apache module that enables ActiveX

2010-04-22 Thread Mauri
Eric, I'm very sorry for the new thread but I'm no able to reply to original thread. As per the previous mail, I have this error, always! (by 2 days): "Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further inf

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache module that enables ActiveX

2010-04-22 Thread Eric Covener
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Mauri wrote: > Hi Eric. I mean this. > > in the Scenario A I have the TCP connection as per image: persistent.png > in the Scenario B I have the TCP connection as per image:persistent2.png Still no clue what you're trying to express. I just see 2 connections in on

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache module that enables ActiveX

2010-04-22 Thread Eric Covener
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Mauri wrote: > Hi Eric. I mean this. > > in the Scenario A I have the TCP connection as per image: persistent.png > in the Scenario B I have the TCP connection as per image:persistent2.png Please don't create thread after thread, and don't subject everyone on the

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache module that enables ActiveX

2010-04-21 Thread Eric Covener
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Mauri wrote: > when I login to web server , i'm reading 2 stable TCP connection in > connection. > All the request from my i.e. to web server close one session and generate a > new session. What do you mean by session? -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com ---

[us...@httpd] Apache module that enables ActiveX

2010-04-21 Thread Mauri
Hi experts, a question about my previous problem. Scenario A) client I.E. -> web server IIS (80) when I login to web server , i'm reading 2 stable TCP connection in connection. All request from my i.e. to web server go troughput this 2 sessions. I don't see any other connection. Scenario B) c

[us...@httpd] Apache module that enables ActiveX

2010-04-15 Thread Mauri
Hi, I have a proxy with SSL that forward any request to a backend platform. In this moment I have a problem if I'm trying to execute an activex on the backend platform. I'm reading that the mod_proxy blocks any activex request because it don't trust for the system. How I can do? I'm reading about m