>> RewriteEngine on
>> RewriteRule bob.html alice.html
>
> If this is in the main config, then this will never get matched, since the
> main config will use full pathnames (i.e. /bob.html if the URL is
> http://localhost/bob.html).
it would still match since it's not anchored, but it would normall
Thanks Joost
I had it working before reading you reply minor change to the rule and
removing some stuff from conf - Options All seemed to help
cakephp & wordpress are also now rewriting
I will be reading up on rewritelog and rewriteloglevel
its useful to have friendly tools to assist when things
On 11/11/2010 05:48 PM, Sam Sherlock wrote:
I have set up php, mysql and apache 2.2
but I can't seem to get mod_rewrites to work
would greatly appreciate any ideas to resolve this
RewriteLog and RewriteLogLevel are your friends.
> RewriteEngine on
> RewriteRule bob.html alice.html
If this
I have set up php, mysql and apache 2.2
but I can't seem to get mod_rewrites to work
things that worked fine on xp and also linux just don't work on windows 7
wordpress and cakephp rewrites
but have also tried a simple test as follows
RewriteEngine on
RewriteRule bob.html alice.html
I have a s
I have Apache 2.2.14 with mod_status running as a proxy for an
application server. Ultimately I would like to measure the actual
number of requests successfully served by Apache (successful meaning
an entry in the access log is written, be it 404, 200, 500, etc). One
way to do this is to count th
Openssl & Apache (all modules) has been recompiled.
Thanks.
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Craig Huffstetler <
craig.huffstet...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Attached is the error log.
>
> Have you recompiled mod_ssl and updated OpenSSL?
>
> Craig
>
> Attached is the error log.
Have you recompiled mod_ssl and updated OpenSSL?
Craig
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsub
Attached is the error log.
Thanks.
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Craig Huffstetler <
craig.huffstet...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Do anybody has any clue on this ?
>
> Can you show us an error log and/or the exceptions given? Also, what
> are the "different setups?" I would start to guess at proble
> Do anybody has any clue on this ?
Can you show us an error log and/or the exceptions given? Also, what
are the "different setups?" I would start to guess at problems given
your configuration, but would love to see what errors are actually
being produced.
Thanks,
Craig
Hi All,
Observed that Apache 2.2.6 (& .15) throws exception inconsistently, at
different places, when the setup (Windows 2003 x86, with 4-12 GB RAM) is
configured with many Virtual IPs. This behavior differs on different setups.
On some setup, it fails even with 10-15 VIPs, but on the other, it fa
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Cameron Altenhof-Long
wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion. I checked config files for HostnameLookups but
> didn't find anything.
>
> To further validate my observations, I set up a new Windows 2003 instance on
> Amazon, loaded WAMP (Apache 2.2.11), enabled IIS and
Thanks for the suggestion. I checked config files for HostnameLookups
but didn't find anything.
To further validate my observations, I set up a new Windows 2003
instance on Amazon, loaded WAMP (Apache 2.2.11), enabled IIS and also
loaded the Abyss Web Server. Apache was significantly slower th
Have you verified that you don't have the dns resolution turned on?
Check config files for HostnameLookups, it should be off (it is by
default but better to check)
Hope you find the solution soon
Best,
Antonio Vidal
El 13/05/2010 19:41, Cameron Altenhof-Long escribió:
> We're having a perform
We're having a performance problem with Apache running on Windows
Server 2003 and have not been able to resolve it using any of the
previously mentioned suggestions.
The server runs Windows Server 2003 SP2 and Apache 2.2.13. We have
also tested Apache 2.2.15 on Windows Server 2008 through an A
It looks like the Content-Disposition header is set to attachment for your
.php and .html files and I don't know why. You can try putting following in
your apache config file:
ForceType text/html
and see if it works.
Igor
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Duane A. Garner wrote:
>
> I ins
I installed Apache 2.2 and PHP 5, I got it all working and all of a sudden I
try to open WordPress index.php and it wants to download the file instead of
display it, then Apache crashes. I restarted, still doing so, then I
uninstalled and even restored PC and it still wants to download the
index.h
> +1. Isn't that documented? I'm surprised!
Suppose so, as a n00b though, I thought maybe cutting the default time of 15
in half would do it. It didn't. With many people on fast Internet
connections now, even 1 or 2 second KeepAliveTimeout's seem to work good.
> Interesting! Do you have any
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Geoff Millikan wrote:
>> Fair enough, but if your testing was of ~30 requests, and we
>> are believing that
>> the typical browser is making 6 simultaneous connections,
>> then it sounds like
>> the real magic was 6 * fudge factor of 5 ;-P
>
> LOL, yes, I totally a
> Fair enough, but if your testing was of ~30 requests, and we
> are believing that
> the typical browser is making 6 simultaneous connections,
> then it sounds like
> the real magic was 6 * fudge factor of 5 ;-P
LOL, yes, I totally agree and I kept thinking that no optimization guide has
MinSpa
On 22 Mar 2010, at 08:34, Geoff Millikan wrote:
> Here's three things I wish I had read about Apache optimization that are not
> commonly discussed (we found out by years of trial and error).
Thanks for sharing!
> 1. Set your KeepAliveTimeout to 3 seconds or less.
+1. Isn't that documented?
On 3/22/2010 5:08 AM, Geoff Millikan wrote:
>> if your server averages 300 simulatious connections, you need
>> to start with 300 servers, and you never want it to drop
>> below that number.
>
> Your experience might show otherwise however based on our experience - if we
> averaged 300 new custome
> if your server averages 300 simulatious connections, you need
> to start with 300 servers, and you never want it to drop
> below that number.
Your experience might show otherwise however based on our experience - if we
averaged 300 new customers/min at once (not 300 requests/sec) a
MinSpareServe
On 3/22/2010 3:34 AM, Geoff Millikan wrote:
> Here's three things I wish I had read about Apache optimization that are not
> commonly discussed (we found out by years of trial and error).
Agreed, agreed, and *huh*?
> 3. Increase your StartServers to the number of maximum requests on your
> bigges
thanks for your tips.
Best regards,
Sharl.Jimh.Tsin
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...
Here's three things I wish I had read about Apache optimization that are not
commonly discussed (we found out by years of trial and error). These three
settings are worth more than all the other optimization we've done (e.g.
SendBufferSize, AcceptFilter http data, EnableMMAP On, EnableSendfile On,
On 02/25/2010 11:29 AM, Brandon Stout wrote:
> I have this on my new server...
>
I've found a hack I guess I'll live with. I commented out the
ErrorDocument line here:
# cat /etc/httpd/conf.d/welcome.conf
#
# This configuration file enables the default "Welcome"
# page if there is no default
I have this on my new server:
SuexecUserGroupbrasto brasto
ServerName flfn.org
ServerAliaswww.flfn.org
ServerAdminad...@flfn.org
DocumentRoot /home/brasto/www/flfn
Options Indexes FollowSymLinks
AllowOverride All
CustomLog /
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 21:39, inas inassen wrote:
> Hi
>
> these are my config files
>
> in httpd.conf add
>
[...]
Thank you!
Following these instructions, reading here and there and putting it
all together, I managed to get it to work.
--
Francis Galiegue
ONE2TEAM
Ingénieur système
Mob : +3
that's it
From: mezgh...@hotmail.com
To: users@httpd.apache.org; f...@one2team.com
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 03:40:21 +
Subject: RE: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2: mod_proxy_balancer does not work as
documented?
English message follows
Salut Francis
Le mod_proxy fonctionne t
ot work without this parameter.
Now, I am at home, when I'll get to the office tomorrow I'll send to you my
config.
Inas
> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:28:37 +0100
> From: f...@one2team.com
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2: mod_proxy_balancer
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 09:42, Francis GALIEGUE wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 09:34, Devraj Mukherjee wrote:
>> Hi Francis,
>>
>> I use mod_proxy_ajp to proxy Pentaho, also a Tomcat application. I
>> think what you are looking for is ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain so the
>> cookies are set for t
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 09:33, Philip Wigg wrote:
>
> ProxySet is only available in Apache 2.2 and later. Are you sure
> you're running the 'httpd -S' from the right version of Apache?
>
Yes, this is Apache 2.2. 2.2.3 to be precise (the one bundled with rhel5).
--
Francis Galiegue
ONE2TEAM
Ing
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 09:34, Devraj Mukherjee wrote:
> Hi Francis,
>
> I use mod_proxy_ajp to proxy Pentaho, also a Tomcat application. I
> think what you are looking for is ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain so the
> cookies are set for the right domain.
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_p
Hi Francis,
I use mod_proxy_ajp to proxy Pentaho, also a Tomcat application. I
think what you are looking for is ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain so the
cookies are set for the right domain.
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_proxy.html#proxypassreversecookiedomain
Let me know if you want me t
2010/1/14 Francis GALIEGUE :
> Hello everyone,
>
> For a production platform, we have plans to migrate to Apache 2.2,
> using mod_proxy_ajp and mod_proxy_balancer instead of mod_jk.
>
> Unfortunately, while the "single Tomcat below" case works with no
> problem, the balancer does not work at all...
Hello everyone,
For a production platform, we have plans to migrate to Apache 2.2,
using mod_proxy_ajp and mod_proxy_balancer instead of mod_jk.
Unfortunately, while the "single Tomcat below" case works with no
problem, the balancer does not work at all...
Here is the relevant part of the config
can you elaborate on the solution you alluded to in the bugzilla? I
am guessing LDAPConnectionTimeout should be configuring a different
option keyword?
What did you change, and where did you change it?
-
The official User-To-Use
Hi Eric
Below comes in apache debug logs when primary ldap1 is unreachable or down.
[Sat Jan 09 20:05:58 2010] [debug] proxy_util.c(1806): proxy: grabbed
scoreboard slot 0 in child 22152 for worker proxy:reverse
[Sat Jan 09 20:05:58 2010] [debug] proxy_util.c(1825): proxy: worker
proxy:reverse al
HI Eric
I can close browser and access url again but this time no error comes in
error log file in debugging mode, but my request url is currently still in
processing and apache is trying to seek ldap1.
Muzi
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 1:13 AM, Muzammel Asghar
wrote:
> Hi Eric
>
> Below comes in ap
Right thanks, i check late this email, i have started the apache in debug
mode but no logs comes in error and access logs, let me verify again and
then update you.
so much thanks, i will update you.
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Muzammel
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Muzammel Asghar
wrote:
> Hi Eric and other Guys
>
> I just want to clarify one more.
>
> Fail over cases
>
> Case 1) If ldap1 server is unreachable (in case of ISP down or internet link
>
> down)
>
> Case 2) If ldap1 server is up and accessible and running but ldap
Hi Eric and other Guys
I just want to clarify one more.
Fail over cases
Case 1) If ldap1 server is unreachable (in case of ISP down or internet link
down)
Case 2) If ldap1 server is up and accessible and running but ldap service is
not running only.
I can check thoroughly, Apache failover work
Guys if any one successfully implement ldap fail over auth with apache then
please give suggestions, as i think its the right mailling list from where i
can put questions and need feedbacks.
Thanks
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 12:44 AM, Muzammel Asghar
wrote:
> Hi Eric
>
> Kindly send ur sample apache
Hi Eric
Kindly send ur sample apache conf for ldap fail over auth so i can compare
my values with it. or please suggest how to make it effective.
Thanks
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Muzammel Asghar
wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thanks Eric, currently ldap is running fine, i can use ssh and ftp auth
> wit
Hi
Thanks Eric, currently ldap is running fine, i can use ssh and ftp auth with
ldap also, its working f9 and also with ldap fail over auth.
Now in apache case, its also working f9 with ldap1 but when ldap1 goes down,
its not forward request to ldap2, this problem is for apache only, other
ldap c
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Muzammel Asghar
wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thanks Erics, now i mention the conf section which i configure for ldap fail
> over auth, you can please check and tell its ok or not, becuase its not
> currently working with ldap fail over.
That is all handled by the LDAP library,
Hi
Thanks Erics, now i mention the conf section which i configure for ldap fail
over auth, you can please check and tell its ok or not, becuase its not
currently working with ldap fail over.
I can setup this file in my --> /etc/httpd/conf.d/ldaptest.config
I define only here below the ldap relat
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Muzammel Asghar
wrote:
> Hi All
>
> Any more discussion and suggestions regarding this thread
>
> can some one use two ldap hosts and successfully test the ldap fail over
> auth with apache ?
Works for me. I couldn't understand any of your attempts to answer
the
Hi All
Any more discussion and suggestions regarding this thread
can some one use two ldap hosts and successfully test the ldap fail over
auth with apache ?
My apache conf which i mentioned is ok or not ?
Please suggest.
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 12:23 AM, Muzammel Asghar
wrote:
> Hi Eric
>
> LD
Hi Eric
LDAP Client = apache try to linked with ldap2 if ldap1 fails i submited the
conf in which i use ldap auth for apache
LDAPTrustedMode TLS
LDAPConnectionTimeout 4
AuthName "Testing Ldap fail over"
AuthType Basic
# The LDAP server(s)
AuthLDAPURL "ldap://ldap1.mydomain.com
ldap2.mydomain
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Muzammel Asghar
wrote:
> So please kindly give suggestions , what i need extra to make ldap fail over
> effective.
What LDAP client is Apache linked with, and how does an ldapsearch
client behave linked to the same one?
What's the LogLevel debug output during the
hi Guys
I am using apache version Apache/2.2.13 (Unix) on Fedora -11 , and using
ldap as url authentications. I setup my conf in -->
/etc/httpd/conf.d/mydomain.conf with below values
I define only here below the ldap related entries only.
LDAPTrustedMode TLS
LDAPConnectionTimeout 7
AuthName
Rich Bowen wrote:
Being logged on as root makes no difference, because this is a HTTP
request to the server.
What does the error log say? You're probably lacking an "allow from"
directive somewhere. See:
http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/ClientDeniedByServerConfiguration and
Just found out (readin
Just migrated to apache-2.2.13 and already ran into this problem:
myserver# apachectl fullstatus
Forbidden - You don't have permission to access /server-status on this
server.
Even getting the same error when logged on as 'root'
Can you tell me what is causing this? Thanks.
Jos
Check th
On Dec 5, 2009, at 08:18 , Jos Chrispijn wrote:
Just migrated to apache-2.2.13 and already ran into this problem:
myserver# apachectl fullstatus
Forbidden - You don't have permission to access /server-status on
this server.
Even getting the same error when logged on as 'root'
Can you tel
Just migrated to apache-2.2.13 and already ran into this problem:
myserver# apachectl fullstatus
Forbidden - You don't have permission to access /server-status on this
server.
Even getting the same error when logged on as 'root'
Can you tell me what is causing this? Thanks.
Jos
William A. Rowe Jr. schrieb:
Peter Schober wrote:
* Hendrik Schmieder [2009-11-19 12:53]:
Is mod_fcgid stable enough for production usage ?
"Yes"
agreed [1]
[1] there is an issue handling large POST bodies in 2.3.4, you may wish to stay
with 2.3.1 (not recommended though), or grab from su
Peter Schober wrote:
> * Hendrik Schmieder [2009-11-19 12:53]:
>> Is mod_fcgid stable enough for production usage ?
>
> "Yes"
agreed [1]
[1] there is an issue handling large POST bodies in 2.3.4, you may wish to stay
with 2.3.1 (not recommended though), or grab from subversion, or hold for 2.3.
Hendrik Schmieder wrote:
> Hello,
>
> can somebody tell why mod_fcgid is not part of the apache distribution ?
Mostly because it is evolving faster/out of sync with the httpd distribution,
and applies to all of the 2.0, 2.2 and trunk distributions.
Will it become part of the core once it is 'bak
* Hendrik Schmieder [2009-11-19 12:53]:
> Is mod_fcgid stable enough for production usage ?
"Yes"
-peter
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> f
Eric Covener schrieb:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Hendrik Schmieder
wrote:
Hello,
can somebody tell why mod_fcgid is not part of the apache distribution ?
mod_fcgid was maintained by a third party until relatively recently,
and just recently being worked on inside of Apache as a sub-pro
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Hendrik Schmieder
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> can somebody tell why mod_fcgid is not part of the apache distribution ?
mod_fcgid was maintained by a third party until relatively recently,
and just recently being worked on inside of Apache as a sub-project of
the HTTP Serv
Hello,
can somebody tell why mod_fcgid is not part of the apache distribution ?
tia
Hendrik
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more
Hello!
I have a weird problem. I am running two sites under mod_perl under
Apache 2.2
under windows 2003.
The same setup on FreeBSD works fine, but under windows after some time
(an hour or less)
i start to get connection drops when trying to open a site.
I strart firefox, type in the url,
Hi,
I compiled subversion with apache 2.2 on solaris but when I hit the server with
an svn request, it produces a core dump. Running a pstack on the core file
produces:
# /bin/pstack /bb/cores/core.httpd.5718.1257279721
core '/bb/cores/core.httpd.5718.1257279721' of 5718:
/bb/web/apache_2_2
On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 05:55 -0700, Luis Clemente wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>Someone knows how I can setting the apache 2.2. server to authenticated in
> a Ldap server? Here is my httpd.conf Ldap configuration:
>
>
> AuthBasicProvider ldap
> AuthType basic
> AuthLDAPURL "ldap://ldapser
Hi all,
Someone knows how I can setting the apache 2.2. server to authenticated in a
Ldap server? Here is my httpd.conf Ldap configuration:
AuthBasicProvider ldap
AuthType basic
AuthLDAPURL "ldap://ldapserver.com:389/o=domain.com?mail";
AuthzLDAPAuthoritative on
AuthName
Hello list users.
I'm struggling with mod_proxy parameters related to amount of open connections
to backend etc. Here is an excerpt of my configuration:
ProxyPass /exchange/ https://exchange.company.com/exchange/ min=10 max=32
acquire=1 keepalive=on retry=5 timeout=15
ProxyPassReverse /exc
I have done what you suggested and was able to get what I thought Apache
needed but that didn't seem to work once put into Apache.
I do think you are right, this is the wrong group to ask.
Peter Schober wrote:
* Jeff Shearer [2009-06-02 16:32]:
Over the last 3 days I have played with a number
* Jeff Shearer [2009-06-02 16:32]:
> Over the last 3 days I have played with a number of configurations and
> executed numerous varieties of searchs. But to no good. If you look
> down to the caption "My Best Result," It seems OpenLDAP has made it to
> the point where it is searching the 2 c
Thanks Peter for all of your suggestions. I have followed them all with
the exception of your security recommendations. I have avoided this
matter in an attempt to minimize the complexity of the problem so my
small mind can see what is happening.
As you suggested Peter, I have read logs, rfc
* Peter Schober [2009-05-27 12:33]:
> > I have tried a number of configurations for group authenticaiton, all
> > without success. Following is the current iteration of my apache
> > configuration for the superteam.docs directory:
> >
> >
> >AuthType basic
> >AuthName "Super Team Memb
* Jeff Shearer [2009-05-27 08:43]:
> dn: cn=SuperTeam,ou=groups,dc=my,dc=mydomain,dc=com
> ou: groups
> description: People who are employees of Super Team
> uniqueMember: uid=jeffshearer,dc=my,dc=mydomain,dc=com
> uniqueMember: uid=maeshearer,dc=my,dc=mydomain,dc=com
> objectClass: groupOfUniqueN
I have been trying to implement group-based authentication using LDAP.
But have yet to find the secret. I have been able to implement
individual authentication using the “require ldap-user [username]”
directive successfully.
Some background information: I am using FreeBSD 7.2, Apache 2.2, an
Ok, so I just confirmed that the autoindex_module is loaded statically, so that
is not the issue.
From: McGarr, J. Michael [mailto:mike.mcg...@excella.com]
Sent: Tue 5/19/2009 4:56 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [us...@httpd] [Apache 2.2] Issues with
I am new to Apache installations and administration and I have a new Apache
httpd instance setup and I would like to setup autoindexing on a certain
directory. I only get 404 errors from the directory. I checked to see if
mod_autoindex is being loaded and I didn't see it in the httpd.conf Load
r...@menkisys.net wrote:
MaxKeepAliveRequests is 60
KeepAliveTimeout is 3
I don't know fastcgi at all, so I have no idea if something at that
level explains your symptoms.
But why don't you try to reduce MaxKeepAliveRequests to, for example,
MaxKeepAliveRequests 5
or whatever number
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:14 PM, wrote:
>> hello
>> i have debian lenny 64bit lenny server with intel quadcore cpu and 4gb
>> ram (fastcgi 2.4.6). i have about 1.4 tb traffic month on this server. my
>> problem is the speed of fastcgi application. when i want the visit one
>> website on my serve
hello
i have debian lenny 64bit lenny server with intel quadcore cpu and 4gb ram
(fastcgi 2.4.6). i have about 1.4 tb traffic month on this server. my problem
is the speed of fastcgi application. when i want the visit one website on my
server somethimes i must wait about 4 seconds the view
From: Prasanna Ram Venkatachalam Sent: April 6, 2009 17:00
>
> As far as i remember there is no such thing as "standard" for
> putting certificates though i suggest not to put certificates
> anywhere in DocumentRoot(s) (just to avoid extrernal access). Apart
> from that any localsystem location sh
As far as i remember there is no such thing as "standard" for putting
certificates though i suggest not to put certificates anywhere in
DocumentRoot(s) (just to avoid extrernal access). Apart from that any
localsystem location should be fine. For finer understanding/convenience u
can put it under c
Hi All:
I am in the process of upgrading our systems from RHEL3 to RMEL5 and
this includes upgrading our web server from Apache 2.0.46 to 2.2.3.
In review the my previous installation notes and the current docs it
appears that the /etc/http/conf/ssl.crt and ssl.key directories are
no long used. Fr
El Martes, 30 de Diciembre de 2008 17:53:42 krist.vanbes...@gmail.com escribió:
> On 12/30/08, Miguel Angel Tormo Alfaro wrote:
>
> > I thought it could be a browser issue, however the same config in apache 2.0
> > doesn't behave this way. On the other hand I'm able to reproduce the problem
> > w
On 12/30/08, Miguel Angel Tormo Alfaro wrote:
> I thought it could be a browser issue, however the same config in apache 2.0
> doesn't behave this way. On the other hand I'm able to reproduce the problem
> with firefox 2, 3, seamonkey 1.1.7 and konqueror. I don't see anything
> related to this in
Hi all,
I recently installed an apache web server using version 2.2.9, and I'm having
strange issues with the SSL behaviour. I don't need client certificate
validation so I didn't use the directive SSLVerifyClient. However, as apache
asked for a client certificate, I changed the SSLVerifyClient
85 matches
Mail list logo
